Author Topic: Fielder  (Read 286837 times)

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2175 on: January 11, 2012, 04:40:38 pm »
and btw, i was completely wrong.  said he'd be a nat by monday/tuesday.

now i truly believe it's going to come down to the 18th darvish deadline. 

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2176 on: January 11, 2012, 04:43:47 pm »
I think Knorr and whoever else has been saying that the signing will keep until after the 18th have been right on the money. I still don't know if we're getting Fielder or not. The Lerners are hoping Fielder gets discontinued or that the expiration date on the label passes so they can get a cheap bargain.   :popcorn:

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2177 on: January 11, 2012, 04:46:00 pm »
January 18th; the day that z_d_k may or may not become a Rangers fan. :D

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2178 on: January 11, 2012, 04:47:28 pm »
The Nats aren't interested in Fielder. Ladsund is an idiot but the reasons he gave on why they won't sign him are legit. He doesn't fit what Rizzo is looking for, not at all. We aren't getting him.

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2179 on: January 11, 2012, 04:57:32 pm »
LOL he wants a similar deal to Pujols, what a flop. Can actually say we are smart for once in not signing him.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2180 on: January 11, 2012, 04:58:34 pm »
LOL he wants a similar deal to Pujols, what a flop. Can actually say we are smart for once in not signing him.

Boras probably wants a Pujols deal.

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2181 on: January 11, 2012, 05:00:09 pm »
True. Who is going to offer that kind of money though? That's what I want to know.

Offline HTT

  • Posts: 212
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2182 on: January 11, 2012, 05:00:44 pm »
Lorb was on with Bowden and Casey Stern on Inside Pitch between 4:15 and 4:30.  Before he came on, Bowden said that if Ladson prints it, it came from a Lerner, Rizzo or some other high placed Nats source.  He would know, right?   Ladson basically came on and reiterated the article.  If the price doesn't come time, the Nats are unlikely to sign Fielder.  If the price/years come down, different story. 

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2183 on: January 11, 2012, 05:01:00 pm »
LOL he wants a similar deal to Pujols, what a flop. Can actually say we are smart for once in not signing him.

This is supply and demand. If some team is stupid enough to sign him to a deal like that, let them have him.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31839
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2184 on: January 11, 2012, 05:03:33 pm »
so as usual we are going to end up listening to them brag about making the second best offer

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2185 on: January 11, 2012, 05:03:44 pm »
Lorb was on with Bowden and Casey Stern on Inside Pitch between 4:15 and 4:30.  Before he came on, Bowden said that if Ladson prints it, it came from a Lerner, Rizzo or some other high placed Nats source.  He would know, right?   Ladson basically came on and reiterated the article.  If the price doesn't come time, the Nats are unlikely to sign Fielder.  If the price/years come down, different story. 

This is pretty much what the consensus has been so far, so this article really adds no value. Another week+ of this is going to drive me insane.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2186 on: January 11, 2012, 05:11:59 pm »
People are calling into XM and saying the Nats shouldn't sign Fielder cause it makes them like the Skins and Caps.

Unreal.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2187 on: January 11, 2012, 05:13:34 pm »
so as usual we are going to end up listening to them brag about making the second best offer

Yeah.

People are calling into XM and saying the Nats shouldn't sign Fielder cause it makes them like the Skins and Caps.

Unreal.

Different sports people! damn.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2188 on: January 11, 2012, 05:19:49 pm »
shows screen calls. Their looking for callers that will cause controversy.
People are calling into XM and saying the Nats shouldn't sign Fielder cause it makes them like the Skins and Caps.

Unreal.


Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2189 on: January 11, 2012, 05:27:17 pm »
Called in. Yelled at morons. Feel better.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2190 on: January 11, 2012, 05:29:10 pm »
Called in. Yelled at morons. Feel better.

really? What did you say? I want to listen to the podcast what name did you give??

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2191 on: January 11, 2012, 05:29:50 pm »
David in Richmond

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2192 on: January 11, 2012, 05:29:53 pm »
Since no one is going to give him that, 10 years isn't really a realistic argument as to why we shouldn't sign him.

Absolutely. There's no indication that that's still (assuming it ever was) his asking price.  Reread that Ladson column.  He "skillfully" neglects to say or even speculate about an asking price, only what the Nationals (and everybody else) won't pay.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2193 on: January 11, 2012, 05:31:17 pm »
David in Richmond

LOL

I'm going to listen

What did you say?

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2194 on: January 11, 2012, 05:31:20 pm »
JimBo is trying to convert O's fans into Nats fans.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2195 on: January 11, 2012, 05:32:21 pm »
2 years away are you kidding? Sign Fielder was the basic gist.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8146
  • The one true ace
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2196 on: January 11, 2012, 05:32:46 pm »
January 18th; the day that z_d_k may or may not become a Rangers fan. :D

  :D  im hoping that he doesn't sign and we get him next year

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2197 on: January 11, 2012, 05:33:00 pm »
David in Richmond

high five. That's cool that you called in and ranted.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8146
  • The one true ace
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2198 on: January 11, 2012, 05:33:05 pm »
JimBo is trying to convert O's fans into Nats fans.

good man

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2936
  • Too Stressed to care.
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #2199 on: January 11, 2012, 05:39:42 pm »
really? What did you say? I want to listen to the podcast what name did you give??

MLB/XM is on a podcast, too?