Author Topic: Nationals vs Padres, Game 1 (Read 16179 times)

Sharp · « **Reply #300 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:14:04 pm »

Quote from: Terpfan76 on May 27, 2011, 10:12:06 pm

His defense has been OK, not great, but acceptable all things considered.

In terms of errors, yeah, but his UZR/150 is legendarily bad in LF. We'd be making the same mistake we did keeping Dunn there for so long.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #301 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:14:08 pm »

Why doesnt gameday have the damn homer up!!

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #302 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:14:33 pm »

Quote from: cmdterps44 on May 27, 2011, 10:14:08 pm

Why doesnt gameday have the damn homer up!!

nvm its up

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/gameday/index.jsp?gid=2011_05_27_sdnmlb_wasmlb_1&mode=gameday

tomterp · « **Reply #303 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:14:53 pm »

Quote from: Terpfan76 on May 27, 2011, 10:12:06 pm

His defense has been OK, not great, but acceptable all things considered.

He's been perfectly acceptable at first. Great stretch play for one out. No, he's not close to LaRoche, but he's better than Dunn and we need him now, and we need him there.

tomterp · « **Reply #304 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:15:42 pm »

Quote from: Sharp on May 27, 2011, 10:14:04 pm

In terms of errors, yeah, but

UZR/150 is legendarily bad in LF. We'd be making the same mistake we did keeping Dunn there for so long.

He's our first baseman now.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #305 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:17:17 pm »

The sub horn is beyond awful.

Sharp · « **Reply #306 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:18:47 pm »

Quote from: tomterp on May 27, 2011, 10:15:42 pm

He's our first baseman now.

I realize that, but you and I both know that when LaRoche comes back up Morse is going back into the outfield.

RL04 · « **Reply #307 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:19:02 pm »

Riggs used an adverb! I don't believe it.

PC · « **Reply #308 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:19:51 pm »

Quote from: Sharp on May 27, 2011, 10:18:47 pm

I realize that, but you and I both know that when LaRoche comes back up Morse is going back into the outfield.

LaRoche is likely done for the season.

Terpfan76 · « **Reply #309 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:20:07 pm »

Quote from: Sharp on May 27, 2011, 10:18:47 pm

I realize that, but you and I both know that when LaRoche comes back up Morse is going back into the outfield.

Yeah, but there's really no telling when LaRoche will be back, so there's no real reason to worry about that at the moment.

tomterp · « **Reply #310 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:25:45 pm »

Quote from: Sharp on May 27, 2011, 10:18:47 pm

I realize that, but you and I both know that when LaRoche comes back up Morse is going back into the outfield.

2012

PANatsFan · « **Reply #311 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:25:59 pm »

Quote from: RL04 on May 27, 2011, 10:19:02 pm

Riggs used an adverb! I don't believe it.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #312 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:27:36 pm »

Quote from: tomterp on May 27, 2011, 10:25:45 pm

2012

Pujols 2012. [Don't] Expect it.

spidernat · « **Reply #313 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:27:39 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on May 27, 2011, 10:08:11 pm

This was a winning team's game, period, end of story.

idiot

RL04 · « **Reply #314 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:42:07 pm »

Quote from: cmdterps44 on May 27, 2011, 10:27:36 pm

Pujols 2012. [Don't] Expect it.

Whew. I thought you were serious.

Terpfan76 · « **Reply #315 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:42:07 pm »

Quote from: spidernat on May 27, 2011, 10:27:39 pm

idiot

I don't think he was saying that we are a winning team as much as saying that this is the kind of win that winning teams make. Normally we'd be the Padres in this game.

Sharp · « **Reply #316 on:** May 27, 2011, 10:43:09 pm »

Quote from: Terpfan76 on May 27, 2011, 10:42:07 pm

I don't think he was saying that we are a winning team as much as saying that this is the kind of win that winning teams make. Normally we'd be the Padres in this game.

Winning teams rarely have to win on walkoff homers because they are usually ahead by multiple runs by the time the ninth inning rolls around.

imref · « **Reply #317 on:** May 27, 2011, 11:27:27 pm »

Fun game and a great crowd. Loved the abe as randy savage win in the president's race.

ernie0326 · « **Reply #318 on:** May 27, 2011, 11:32:33 pm »

Quote from: Sharp on May 27, 2011, 10:43:09 pm

Winning teams rarely have to win on walkoff homers because they are usually ahead by multiple runs by the time the ninth inning rolls around.

Perhaps. BUT it is in their DNA that they can pull off games like this when the blowout doesn't happen.

imref · « **Reply #319 on:** May 27, 2011, 11:41:25 pm »

Quote from: ernie0326 on May 27, 2011, 11:32:33 pm

Perhaps. BUT it is in their DNA that they can pull off games like this when the blowout doesn't happen.

winning teams beat the teams they are supposed to beat - we're supposed to beat the Padres. Look, I know we barely beat something between a AAA and an independent league team tonight, but hey, it was a fun night at the park.

imref · « **Reply #320 on:** May 28, 2011, 12:06:58 am »

ESPN on Lannan:

Quote

How Nationals starter John Lannan put the Nationals in position to win against the Padres: - Found his curveball. Entering Friday, Lannan had thrown just 45 curveballs all season. He threw 21 hooks Friday and the Padres were 0-4 with two strikeouts in at-bats ending with the pitch. Hitters are now 0-9 on the season against Lannan's curve. - Effective slider use. Lannan threw only nine sliders but four ended at-bats (0-4), including a strikeout. For the season, foes are hitting .171 in at-bats ending on Lannan's slider. - Control and efficiency. Of the 27 batters he faced, only one saw a 2-0 count. Of the Padres' 27 plate appearances, 15 were three pitches or fewer. In addition, Lannan retired all eight hitters who led off innings.

Kevrock · « **Reply #321 on:** May 28, 2011, 12:08:16 am »

That's an awesome analysis.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #322 on:** May 28, 2011, 05:56:49 am »

I also noticed that before the rain delay he had a very fast pace. He received the ball from the catcher and quickly threw another pitch. It seemed like it worked too. After the rain delay, he still had the same success but I noticed he slowed down a bit. Maybe it was just me though. He did throw his curve a lot today, which is something he has been needing to do.

OldChelsea · « **Reply #323 on:** May 28, 2011, 07:23:52 am »

Comparative dates on which the Nats notched their 22nd win, each season:

2005 - 18th May (40th match)
2010 - 22nd May (44th match)
2008 - 25th May (51st match)
2011 - 27th May (50th match)
2006 - 31st May (54th match)
2007 - 31st May (54th match)
2009 - 25th June (71st match)

PANatsFan · « **Reply #324 on:** May 28, 2011, 08:08:45 am »

Quote from: cmdterps44 on May 28, 2011, 05:56:49 am

I also noticed that before the rain delay he had a very fast pace. He received the ball from the catcher and quickly threw another pitch. It seemed like it worked too. After the rain delay, he still had the same success but I noticed he slowed down a bit. Maybe it was just me though. He did throw his curve a lot today, which is something he has been needing to do.

Factoring in the rain delay, I'll say this is maybe Lannan's best game.