Author Topic: Burnett signed through 2012 (Read 2917 times)

Minty Fresh · « **Reply #50 on:** December 23, 2010, 01:12:32 pm »

Quote from: blue911 on December 23, 2010, 12:53:01 pm

I believe NOTLD and Sean Burnett are the same person.

For a while I thought Chief and Potomac Cannons were one in the same. My conspiracy theory was that Chief created an overtly hostile account so he could tell us what he really felt about us.

The Chief · « **Reply #51 on:** December 23, 2010, 01:13:36 pm »

hammondsnats · « **Reply #52 on:** December 23, 2010, 01:16:52 pm »

Quote from: Minty Fresh on December 23, 2010, 01:12:32 pm

For a while I though Chief and Potomac Cannons were one in the same. My conspiracy theory was that Chief created an overtly hostile account so he could tell us what he really felt about us.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #53 on:** December 23, 2010, 01:27:51 pm »

Quote from: Minty Fresh on December 23, 2010, 01:12:32 pm

For a while I though Chief and Potomac Cannons were one in the same. My conspiracy theory was that Chief created an overtly hostile account so he could tell us what he really felt about us.

I knew Chief wasn't PCan... because Chief thought PCan was someone else... that is... unless Chief wanted to throw me off his trail.

Minty Fresh · « **Reply #54 on:** December 23, 2010, 01:36:40 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on December 23, 2010, 01:27:51 pm

I knew Chief wasn't PCan... because Chief thought PCan was someone else... that is... unless Chief wanted to throw me off his trail.

This conspiracy is like an onion with all of these layers!

blue911 · « **Reply #55 on:** December 23, 2010, 01:45:35 pm »

Quote from: Minty Fresh on December 23, 2010, 01:36:40 pm

This conspiracy is like an onion with all of these layers!

Hammonds is really Mark Lerner, he wants to see people defend him

hammondsnats · « **Reply #56 on:** December 23, 2010, 01:47:24 pm »

Quote from: blue911 on December 23, 2010, 01:45:35 pm

Hammonds is really Mark Lerner, he wants to see people defend him

haha now that would be funny

spidernat · « **Reply #57 on:** December 23, 2010, 01:55:27 pm »

I initially thought PotCan was DCFan.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #58 on:** December 23, 2010, 01:56:59 pm »

Dcfan wasn't thatt wild though.

Evolution33 · « **Reply #59 on:** December 23, 2010, 02:04:23 pm »

Quote from: cmdterps44 on December 23, 2010, 01:56:59 pm

Dcfan wasn't thatt wild though.

He wasn't that positive either unless I am thinking of someone else. I thought DC fan was one of those people that only showed up during losing streaks or when the Nationals missed out on a free agent to rub people's faces in it.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #60 on:** December 23, 2010, 02:09:58 pm »

Quote from: Evolution33 on December 23, 2010, 02:04:23 pm

He wasn't that positive either unless I am thinking of someone else. I thought DC fan was one of those people that only showed up during losing streaks or when the Nationals missed out on a free agent to rub people's faces in it.

hey I was never DCFan

The Chief · « **Reply #61 on:** December 23, 2010, 02:19:48 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on December 23, 2010, 01:27:51 pm

I knew Chief wasn't PCan... because Chief thought PCan was someone else... that is... unless Chief wanted to throw me off his trail.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #62 on:** December 23, 2010, 04:19:28 pm »

Silly Hat induced 53% groundballs last year. The rest were strikeouts

TheCerebral1 · « **Reply #63 on:** December 25, 2010, 11:18:32 am »

Was a nice resigning. He's been fairly productive for the Nationals. As one of their best options with Storen, and maybe Clippard it was nice to see him stay. I wish we could have gotten Capps back.

tomterp · « **Reply #64 on:** December 25, 2010, 08:41:33 pm »

Quote from: TheCerebral1 on December 25, 2010, 11:18:32 am

I wish we could have gotten Capps back.

Maybe we pick up Soriano for 1/$5m?

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #65 on:** December 25, 2010, 11:20:29 pm »

Quote from: tomterp on December 25, 2010, 08:41:33 pm

Maybe we pick up Soriano for 1/$5m?

Benoit, his setup man last year, jut got 3/16.5. No way he'd take 1/5.

PC · « **Reply #66 on:** December 25, 2010, 11:22:43 pm »

Improving the bullpen would improve pitching...and there's actually someone available to do that.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #67 on:** December 25, 2010, 11:24:28 pm »

But not at 1/5, he isn't.

Vega · « **Reply #68 on:** December 25, 2010, 11:54:04 pm »

What's up with the Silly Hat nickname?

PANatsFan · « **Reply #69 on:** December 25, 2010, 11:56:12 pm »

Silly Hat

Vega · « **Reply #70 on:** December 26, 2010, 12:03:53 am »

If anyone should be called Silly Hat, it's Nyjer. He wears his hat almost sideways.

daveb32 · « **Reply #71 on:** December 26, 2010, 03:01:19 am »

No thanks to Soriano. I don't see the need to give up two draft picks for a reliever when we have a surplus of capable ones.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #72 on:** December 26, 2010, 09:02:28 am »

Quote from: Vega on December 26, 2010, 12:03:53 am

If anyone should be called Silly Hat, it's Nyjer. He wears his hat almost sideways.

Sorry, he's Mr. Shotput.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #73 on:** December 26, 2010, 09:03:16 am »

Quote from: daveb32 on December 26, 2010, 03:01:19 am

No thanks to Soriano. I don't see the need to give up two draft picks for a reliever when we have a surplus of capable ones.

It's just a 3rd rounder, and he'd be a valuable trade chip or could garner a 1st rounder if he's on a 1 year deal. Overpaying on a 1 year deal is a smart move.

PatsNats28 · « **Reply #74 on:** December 26, 2010, 10:40:17 am »

Quote from: PANatsFan on December 26, 2010, 09:03:16 am

It's just a 3rd rounder, and he'd be a valuable trade chip or could garner a 1st rounder if he's on a 1 year deal. Overpaying on a 1 year deal is a smart move.

Agreed, it's like trading a 3rd this year for a first next year. And you get Soriano for a year as well.