Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)  (Read 60744 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #375 on: May 08, 2010, 09:28:39 pm »
Joel Hanrahan just struck out Albert Pujols! :shock:

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #376 on: May 08, 2010, 10:25:16 pm »
Ramon Ortiz is "relieving" Charlie Haeger after Haeger gives up four runs, retiring zero batters, in the first inning, Jason Marquis-style.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #377 on: May 08, 2010, 10:26:08 pm »
How long do the Dodgers stick with Haeger?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #378 on: May 08, 2010, 10:26:30 pm »
How long do the Dodgers stick with Haeger?

Four runs, five batters.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #379 on: May 08, 2010, 10:27:24 pm »
Ramon Ortiz gives up a 2-run homer, 6-0, Milwaukee, still nobody out.   :D

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #380 on: May 08, 2010, 10:28:12 pm »
Another single. still nobody out.

EDIT - Ruled a Matt Kemp error.  :|

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #381 on: May 08, 2010, 10:28:41 pm »
Four runs, five batters.
No, I mean, how long do they keep him at the big league level.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #382 on: May 08, 2010, 10:30:00 pm »
No, I mean, how long do they keep him at the big league level.

These four runs, five batters should be his last.  He walked the last four batters he faced, Brian Bruney-style.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #383 on: May 08, 2010, 10:33:19 pm »
And it's Colorado, not Milwaukee.  Milwaukee is pummeling the Diamondbacks, not the Dodgers.

Offline bklynnats

  • Posts: 471
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #384 on: May 12, 2010, 09:52:42 pm »
Per YES up here in NY, Tim Redding was just signed to a minor league deal by the Yankees.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #385 on: May 12, 2010, 11:39:21 pm »
Good to see Ryan Langerhans get called up by the Mariners (Josh Wilson, Jesus Colome also on the club).  I took having Langerhans on this team for granted ... decent player with some pop, blue collar hard walker and good clubhouse type.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #386 on: May 13, 2010, 12:49:37 am »
Good to see Ryan Langerhans get called up by the Mariners (Josh Wilson, Jesus Colome also on the club).  I took having Langerhans on this team for granted ... decent player with some pop, blue collar hard walker and good clubhouse type.

Yea he was a solid defensive OF who could draw some walks for us. He was a good guy to have on the team.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #387 on: May 13, 2010, 03:13:50 pm »
former Nat Corey Patterson had a good game for the O's today.  Hit a solo homer but just saved the game for the Orioles on a pretty good throw home (great play by Wieters).  And no I'm not saying I wish we'd still have him, b/c he was awful for the Nats.  But good for Patterson to have two good games after being recalled from AAA.  Love hearing about stories like that (and Bernadina yesterday). 

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #388 on: May 15, 2010, 03:05:26 pm »
Quote
Yankees designated hitter Nick Johnson is unlikely to return to action before the first week of June, and in fact may not play again before August.

According to GM Brian Cashman, Johnson's sore right wrist may require surgery to remove inflamed tissue, which would keep him out of action another four to six weeks on top of the month he already is expected to miss.

Cashman said Johnson got a cortisone shot in the wrist last weekend in Boston, but it will not be known for another couple of weeks if that course of treatment was effective.

If not, then Johnson is headed under the knife for at least the third time in his injury-plagued career.

Unfortunately, who didn't see this coming?  :?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #389 on: May 15, 2010, 04:36:03 pm »
hopefully we'll be talking about brian bruney in this space here ...

Offline bklynnats

  • Posts: 471
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #390 on: May 15, 2010, 05:07:18 pm »
Unfortunately, who didn't see this coming?  :?

Poor guy. It's amazing how unlucky he is with injuries.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #391 on: May 15, 2010, 09:36:16 pm »
AUSTIN KEARNS IS MY HERO!!!!!!!

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #392 on: May 16, 2010, 12:41:07 am »
AUSTIN KEARNS IS MY HERO!!!!!!!

.333/.408/.533

3 HR, 20 RBI, 9 2B, 2 SB

Guy's off to a great start, hope he keeps it up!. 8)

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #393 on: May 16, 2010, 01:02:07 pm »
The guy has 20 RBI on the season. Last year, he had only 2 RBI after May 18

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #394 on: May 16, 2010, 01:18:45 pm »
So at what point do we say he was dogging it last year like his buddy Felipe? :|

Apparently the Reds are the ones who really did the shafting in that trade.  They traded us two guys who can't play worth a damn near sea level :roll:

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #395 on: May 16, 2010, 02:40:53 pm »
So at what point do we say he was dogging it last year like his buddy Felipe? :|


man, the past two year's teams have just been the absolute worst in every conceivable way. incompetent FO, passive manager, players who didn't give a crap.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #396 on: May 16, 2010, 02:48:43 pm »
So at what point do we say he was dogging it last year like his buddy Felipe? :|

I don't think he was.  He seemed genuinely frustrated by his failures.  Felipe didn't look like he could give two craps.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #397 on: May 16, 2010, 02:53:14 pm »
I don't think he was.  He seemed genuinely frustrated by his failures.  Felipe didn't look like he could give two craps.

Yeah I wasn't being serious, it's just kind of a "funny" coincidence.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #398 on: May 17, 2010, 03:24:51 pm »
Nick Johnson out until July after wrist surgery.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #399 on: May 17, 2010, 03:38:11 pm »
I don't think he was.  He seemed genuinely frustrated by his failures.  Felipe didn't look like he could give two craps.

Yea I don't think Austin showed any signs of not caring while he was here.

He's my boy, I hope he can keep up this pace.