Author Topic: Time for Guzman to go  (Read 6962 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #50 on: July 26, 2009, 01:00:12 pm »
This from Nick Cafardo this morning:

"Bill Smith, GM, Twins - Smith may address two needs before the trade deadline - middle infield and reliever. He needs both for the Twins to make a second-half run. There’s been talk of Orlando Cabrera, Freddy Sanchez, and perhaps Cristian Guzman for second base. With Target Field opening next season the Twins might be able to stretch their normal payroll."

Add in Beimel, and we might be able to address a couple of needs.  What is reasonable to ask back, I don't know.  I'm not familiar enough with their system, otehr than they have soem depth at catcher that we don't need. 

Guzman for Jose Mijares and Steven Tolleson would work for me.

Offline wisefan11

  • Posts: 1240
  • This is Nat Country
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #51 on: July 26, 2009, 02:22:50 pm »
Guzman for salary relief would be fine with me. Ship him off now and free up over $10 million you can offer O-Hud in the offseason (Yes, he's a second baseman. So is Guzman at this point). Meanwhile, call up Ian Desmond and make him the starter at short for the rest of the season.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #52 on: July 29, 2009, 10:37:58 pm »
bump. what a bum

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #53 on: July 29, 2009, 10:41:30 pm »
WTF RIZZO, TRADE THIS BUM ALREADY

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #54 on: July 29, 2009, 10:59:10 pm »
WTF RIZZO, TRADE THIS BUM ALREADY

again for who and who becomes the regular shortstop?  gonzalez has been pathetically terrible since the all-star break. 

i would love for them to bring up desmond and insert him as the everyday shortstop and 7-hole hitter, but we won't do that, seeing how we just promoted him to AAA.

i don't know how many suitors are looking @ guz right now.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #55 on: July 29, 2009, 11:07:48 pm »
Desmond has been bad defensively in Cuse but his BA and OBP are through the roof.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #56 on: July 29, 2009, 11:10:59 pm »
Desmond has been bad defensively in Cuse but his BA and OBP are through the roof.

He has strong arm, but he's pretty bad fielder on the overall. If he makes it to the majors, he probably won't be a SS.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #57 on: July 29, 2009, 11:14:49 pm »
He has strong arm, but he's pretty bad fielder on the overall. If he makes it to the majors, he probably won't be a SS.
yep. I think we could see him in the Majors next month since he is on the 40-man. I wish they moved him to 2B but they haven't so obviously they think he can still make it at SS. He has been playing there all year.

He played CF for like a few innings in a blowout like a week ago.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17945
  • babble on
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #58 on: July 29, 2009, 11:22:09 pm »
Morgan certainly deserved better service than that after effectively sneaking to third on a bunt. 

bump. what a bum

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #59 on: July 29, 2009, 11:23:48 pm »
Morgan certainly deserved better service than that after effectively sneaking to third on a bunt. 

absolutely. After all of that Guz goes up and hacks at the very next pitch. no plan

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #60 on: July 29, 2009, 11:28:22 pm »
again for who and who becomes the regular shortstop?
Who gives a freaking crap?  This season stopped being relevant for this organization eons ago.  We're punting on this season.  It's time to unload any dead weight and get rid of anyone we can and get whatever we can get in the meantime.

We could play Austin Kearns at SS for all I care, but there's no sense in keeping a somewhat tradeable player whose decline has started and is set to get steeper.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #61 on: July 29, 2009, 11:30:36 pm »
Who gives a freaking crap?  This season stopped being relevant for this organization eons ago.  We're punting on this season.  It's time to unload any dead weight and get rid of anyone we can and get whatever we can get in the meantime.

We could play Austin Kearns at SS for all I care, but there's no sense in keeping a somewhat tradeable player whose decline has started and is set to get steeper.
the Nats should eat his entire salary to make him more enticing.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #62 on: July 29, 2009, 11:32:41 pm »
Who gives a freaking crap?  This season stopped being relevant for this organization eons ago.  We're punting on this season.  It's time to unload any dead weight and get rid of anyone we can and get whatever we can get in the meantime.

We could play Austin Kearns at SS for all I care, but there's no sense in keeping a somewhat tradeable player whose decline has started and is set to get steeper.

who is going to play short?

and who wants guzman at this point.

just a lot of yelling from you and SF, no logical answers.  oh well.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45656
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #63 on: July 30, 2009, 10:04:52 am »
Hopefully, someone will look at Felipe Lopez and what he did when he left Washington, look at Guz and our record, and say "he's just lost his focus a bit because he plays for a lousy team, but if he comes to a pennant race, we'll get the all star back."  It's a hope.  That, and paying a Lugo / Wilson premium, and maybe you can get something.  Perhaps a bigger problem is finding a team.  I like the thought of him to Minnesota. They have Punto who can be the defensive replacement. they could even maybe try him at 3d if Crede can't take the field.

As for who plays SS for us?  I really don't care too much at this point, sorry to say.  I'd prefer a $400K veteran who has a decent glove (I don't care about the bat) if we are unwilling to turn it over to Alberto Anderson, or whatever the name is of the glove guy who we go gaga over because he has 2 months of decent hitting. 

Offline Busta Mimes

  • Posts: 233
  • I'll Ram the hell out of you
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #64 on: August 25, 2009, 12:59:16 am »
The first couple months of the season, this guy drove me crazy.  Is it just me, or is he playing much better defense the past several weeks?  I haven't seen every inning, but I've seen a lot, and I don't remember his last error.

Offline Mathguy

  • Posts: 9162
  • Floyd - Truely Man's best Friend
    • Outer Banks Beach House
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #65 on: August 25, 2009, 07:17:52 am »
Oh for Pete's sake - Lopez didn't run out a play this past weekend and screwed up the inning for the Brewers.  The Nats are much better without Lopez.

Hopefully, someone will look at Felipe Lopez and what he did when he left Washington, look at Guz and our record, and say "he's just lost his focus a bit because he plays for a lousy team, but if he comes to a pennant race, we'll get the all star back."  It's a hope.  That, and paying a Lugo / Wilson premium, and maybe you can get something.  Perhaps a bigger problem is finding a team.  I like the thought of him to Minnesota. They have Punto who can be the defensive replacement. they could even maybe try him at 3d if Crede can't take the field.

As for who plays SS for us?  I really don't care too much at this point, sorry to say.  I'd prefer a $400K veteran who has a decent glove (I don't care about the bat) if we are unwilling to turn it over to Alberto Anderson, or whatever the name is of the glove guy who we go gaga over because he has 2 months of decent hitting. 

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #66 on: August 25, 2009, 08:23:15 am »
Oh for Pete's sake - Lopez didn't run out a play this past weekend and screwed up the inning for the Brewers.  The Nats are much better without Lopez.


I saw Lopez dog it too.   I'm glad he's gone if for no other reason than his attitude.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #67 on: August 25, 2009, 09:32:28 am »
I think we'll look back at this and see failing to move Guzman as Rizzo's worst, and possibly sole, mistake of his first season.

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #68 on: August 25, 2009, 09:44:27 am »
I think we'll look back at this and see failing to move Guzman as Rizzo's worst, and possibly sole, mistake of his first season.

He cleared waivers so we still have six days.

Offline CatsEye

  • Posts: 1655
  • Very weird season -Creepy - What....
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #69 on: August 25, 2009, 09:45:47 am »
I think we'll look back at this and see failing to move Guzman as Rizzo's worst, and possibly sole, mistake of his first season.
                   :doh: :doh: You have got to be kidding me.  :shock: Rizzo's worst mistake...........Gimme a break.  :rant:

  How about Gonzales,Belliard, and Kearns? Like they are going to get us to a championship or League win :doh:

   The Guzman dilemma is only a small part of the equation. There is plenty of clean-up left to do...... :nono:
                                                                               8)                                

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 16722
  • What are you dense?
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #70 on: August 25, 2009, 09:45:57 am »
He cleared waivers so we still have six days.

Which kind of gives you an idea of how much interest there is around baseball for his services.  ;)

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18596
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #71 on: August 25, 2009, 09:54:48 am »
Which kind of gives you an idea of how much interest there is around baseball for his services.  ;)

Exactly.Guzman's age,salary and decreased range make him less than attractive for any team. On the other hand, the Nats don't have anybody that looks like they are ready to push him out of the starting role. 

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45656
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #72 on: August 25, 2009, 10:05:54 am »
Oh for Pete's sake - Lopez didn't run out a play this past weekend and screwed up the inning for the Brewers.  The Nats are much better without Lopez.


Look, I think Felipe's a dog, too, but he played well last year after the he left here and he was good enough for someone to trade for him this year.  How many times have you heard of a guy needing "a change of scenery?"  It's one of the mandatory sports writer cliches whether its true or not.  Back in July, when people were saying Guz is cold and could not be traded, I was saying that someone might think that way.  For Pete's sake.  Also, as far as Felipe dogging it, anyone surprised he's back to a dog when his team is out of contention? 

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #73 on: August 25, 2009, 10:21:51 am »
when alberto gonzalez is the alternative to replace him, you keep guzman.

Offline Natskins

  • Posts: 826
Re: Time for Guzman to go
« Reply #74 on: August 25, 2009, 10:45:17 am »
                    :doh: :doh: You have got to be kidding me.  :shock: Rizzo's worst mistake...........Gimme a break.  :rant:

  How about Gonzales,Belliard, and Kearns? Like they are going to get us to a championship or League win :doh:

How are those guys Rizzo's mistake? they all predated his tenure as GM. What do you mean?