Author Topic: Tex and the Nats...  (Read 170620 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #400 on: November 20, 2008, 01:13:44 pm »
Cult?  I stated a fact.  Dunno how that makes me a cult member.

dude, take a joke. I was just commenting on the fact that other Dunn-fans showed up.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #401 on: November 20, 2008, 01:14:59 pm »
He has a career .214 BA with 2 outs and RISP spanning 429 ABs.

He has a career .225 BA with RISP spanning 969 ABs.

Walks don't drive in runs, hits do.

UNLESS THE BASES ARE LOADED, OR THE NEXT GUY WALKS OR GETS A HIT TOO :bang: OUTS DONT SCORE RUNS, UNLESS THEY ARE DP'S WITH THE BASES LOADED, ERRORS ARE COMMITTED, OR SACRIFICES :bang:

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #402 on: November 20, 2008, 01:15:55 pm »
He has a career .214 BA with 2 outs and RISP spanning 429 ABs.

He has a career .225 BA with RISP spanning 969 ABs.

Walks don't drive in runs, hits do.
Walks don't drive in runs in most situations, but they keep rallies going, at the very least.

But you're ignoring slugging percentage, which is very important here.  Dunn has 26 home runs in those ~420 at bats, as well as 20 doubles.  He doesn't get so many hits, but when he does, he really makes them count.  That's why he consistently has RBI totals that hit 90+.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #403 on: November 20, 2008, 01:17:08 pm »
wtf is a "craisin"?

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #404 on: November 20, 2008, 01:17:26 pm »
UNLESS THE BASES ARE LOADED, OR THE NEXT GUY WALKS OR GETS A HIT TOO :bang: OUTS DONT SCORE RUNS, UNLESS THEY ARE DP'S WITH THE BASES LOADED, ERRORS ARE COMMITTED, OR SACRIFICES :bang:
:rofl: It's not worth it getting mad about this.  There are too many with this "walks don't do anything when you have runners on" mentality.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21929
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #405 on: November 20, 2008, 01:19:38 pm »
UNLESS THE BASES ARE LOADED, OR THE NEXT GUY WALKS OR GETS A HIT TOO :bang: OUTS DONT SCORE RUNS, UNLESS THEY ARE DP'S WITH THE BASES LOADED, ERRORS ARE COMMITTED, OR SACRIFICES :bang:

not to mention forcing the pitcher to throw at least four more pitchers without recording an out.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #406 on: November 20, 2008, 01:19:51 pm »
wtf is a "craisin"?
:rofl: They're a dried cranberry snack.  They're like raisins, but they're cranberries, hence the name.



houston-nat used that term in a sentence at one point and it was so inane that I had to put it in my sig.

Also, I didn't mean to sound defensive earlier.  There are some here who like to accuse people of being "cult members" for stating facts.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #407 on: November 20, 2008, 01:25:02 pm »

I cannot believe Hammonds "I have Lerners are Cheap tattooed on my forehead" Nats thinks there is a separate budget for draft picks. Everything reported about mid market teams, even the Diamondbacks who blews tons of money on Johnson, says that multiple 1st round picks have to be taken into account in the overall budget.

In that case they can always feed us the bullcrap that our draft picks are our big FA signings.  :?

ok, I just have to ask.

what is so god damn special about Adam Dunn?



The disparity between his AVG and OBP give people something to point to and flex their superior baseball acumen when they praise the almighty walk.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #408 on: November 20, 2008, 01:27:35 pm »
Ok fine - then you have "a force at every base" - or a setup for a grand slam - but hits put the ball in play and risk potential outs.



That's freaking laughable. But to offset the potential of runners being thrown out in attempting to get an extra base on a hit there is also the potential of errors by the defense that could lead to more runs and advancement.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #409 on: November 20, 2008, 01:27:57 pm »
The Nats have seperate budgets for draft picks and for signing free agents/improving MLB roster.  I hope everyone knows that.

I do not know that.  Convince me.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #410 on: November 20, 2008, 01:31:09 pm »
In that case they can always feed us the bullcrap that our draft picks are our big FA signings.  :?
Where have you been?  They've been doing that.  Their excuse for not spending more this year and last was that they were "improving the farm system."  Forget the fact that you can have a credible mid-budget ML roster AND improve your farm system if you aren't a cheap SOB. :?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #411 on: November 20, 2008, 01:33:43 pm »


That's freaking laughable. But to offset the potential of runners being thrown out in attempting to get an extra base on a hit there is also the potential of errors by the defense that could lead to more runs and advancement.

But see you understand subtlety. I was trying to explain that there are multiple outcomes to a walk, a hit, and an out to sportsfan.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #412 on: November 20, 2008, 01:36:02 pm »
Where have you been?  They've been doing that.  Their excuse for not spending more this year and last was that they were "improving the farm system."  Forget the fact that you can have a credible mid-budget ML roster AND improve your farm system if you aren't a cheap SOB. :?


Exactly. The Lerners are probably waiting for other teams to make offers like 10/220 so they can show how "WILLING" they are to spend big and make a 10/200 offer that has no shot of being accepted. Some have already said here that all they care about is that they make a good offer and show willingness to spend.   :?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #413 on: November 20, 2008, 01:37:34 pm »
But see you understand subtlety. I was trying to explain that there are multiple outcomes to a walk, a hit, and an out to sportsfan.

You don't have to explain any of this stuff to me. I don't have a problem with walks. I just have an issue with those that talk as if the walk is the consummate achievement of hitting.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #414 on: November 20, 2008, 01:38:42 pm »

Exactly. The Lerners are probably waiting for other teams to make offers like 10/220 so they can show how "WILLING" they are to spend big and make a 10/200 offer that has no shot of being accepted. Some have already said here that all they care about is that they make a good offer and show willingness to spend.   :?

I think that if they are just BSing about Teixiera, then they need to just go ahead and make an offer to Dunn and get it over with.

but nothing is going to happen until December 2nd at any rate on any front. it's all just talk until draft picks are no longer in the equation.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #415 on: November 20, 2008, 01:42:06 pm »
I'm not talking about happy attitudes I'm talking about learning how to win freaking baseball games which we as a team do not know how to do yet. We need a player who is used to winning and will not accept losing (see: Derek Lowe, etc.).

It sounds silly but it is NOT. This team needs to learn how to WIN.

Hey Chief, Joe Morgan has hacked sportsfan's account and is posting crazy stuff.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #416 on: November 20, 2008, 01:45:39 pm »
You don't have to explain any of this stuff to me. I don't have a problem with walks. I just have an issue with those that talk as if the walk is the consummate achievement of hitting.

Walks plus hitting and not hitting into DP's makes for a fearsome hitter. Strikeouts are among the least damaging outs you can have (you can even steal 1st!!!)

Online The Chief

  • Posts: 31841
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #417 on: November 20, 2008, 01:46:04 pm »
Hey Chief, Joe Morgan has hacked sportsfan's account and is posting crazy stuff.

:rofl:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #418 on: November 20, 2008, 01:51:03 pm »
Walks plus hitting and not hitting into DP's makes for a fearsome hitter. Strikeouts are among the least damaging outs you can have (you can even steal 1st!!!)

You're reaching dude.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #419 on: November 20, 2008, 01:53:39 pm »
You're reaching dude.

Explain how a strikeout is as bad as a DP or a fielder's choice or a caught stealing. I'm waiting.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #420 on: November 20, 2008, 01:58:30 pm »
I think we'll see offers for 8/160ish for starters. 

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #421 on: November 20, 2008, 01:58:32 pm »
Explain how a strikeout is as bad as a DP or a fielder's choice or a caught stealing. I'm waiting.

it seems to me, you are valuing a player more for what the might NOT do, rather than what they CAN and WILL do.

that's a bad way of going about this.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21929
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #422 on: November 20, 2008, 02:00:25 pm »
it seems to me, you are valuing a player more for what the might NOT do, rather than what they CAN and WILL do.

that's a bad way of going about this.

He can hit home runs, he will get on base- is that better?


MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #423 on: November 20, 2008, 02:03:11 pm »
He can hit home runs, he will get on base- is that better?



yes.

but Dunn doesn't exactly have the market cornered on this, now does he?

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #424 on: November 20, 2008, 02:05:15 pm »
so, going back to a point I made the did not get responded to..

how does signing Tex for say, 8-10 years, with an out clause at 5 cripple the team "for years"? 

I don't see any circumstance where you'd take Dunn over Tex(if you can get him), other than simply taking the cheaper option.