Author Topic: Mitchell Report to Name Names  (Read 2378 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7172
Re: Mitchell Report to Name Names
« Reply #25 on: October 16, 2007, 07:50:02 pm »
Just found on WJLA website:

Union, Mitchell at Odds Over Evidence   posted 7:18 pm Tue October 16, 2007 - NEW YORK

A lawyer for baseball players says George Mitchell never told the union before last week that he was willing to show its members evidence of doping allegations against them. Mitchell, who has spent 1 1/2 years investigating the use of performance-enhancing drugs in baseball, said Friday that he asked players to meet with him "for the purpose of directly providing them with the evidence about the allegations and to give them a chance to respond." 
           
 
related stories:
Source: Mitchell Gets Radomski Documents
Mitchell May Name Names in Steroids Case

Union general counsel Michael Weiner said Tuesday that Mitchell only informed players of that stance during a meeting last week and in a letter Friday. Weiner wrote to the former Senate Majority leader on Tuesday asking him to clarify his position and to provide his timeframe for completing the investigation.

"He certainly had not suggested prior to last week that the purpose of asking these players to come in was to provide them with evidence, provide them with anything," Weiner said.

 Until now, Mitchell has provided players only with general notice that they have been accused, giving them the year of the alleged conduct and the team they were playing for at the time. He has not told them of the substances they are accused of using.

Active players generally have refused to meet with Mitchell, who is a director of the Boston Red Sox. The only active player known to have met with him was the New York Yankees' Jason Giambi, who did so only after commissioner Bud Selig threatened discipline for remarks in a newspaper interview.

"In our view, the senator's current statement of his position can't be squared with substantial correspondence between the senator and the association over the course of the investigation nor can it be squared with communication and conduct directly with individuals who have been interviewed," Weiner said.

"What we're asking him to do is clarify exactly what his position is, and then we'll figure out what to do going forward. I don't think what he said is accurate. It certainly is not accurate if what he's saying, 'It's been my position since March 1, 2007.'"

Mitchell did not respond to requests for comment.

Thomas Carlucci, a lawyer on a firm representing baseball, told teams last week that the report likely will be issued in November or December. He also told them to be prepared for Mitchell's report to contain names of players alleged to have used performance-enhancing substances.

On Monday, a person familiar with the probe said Mitchell has received an extensive paper trail documenting performance-enhancing drugs sent to players by former New York Mets clubhouse attendant Kirk Radomski.

Written By RONALD BLUM

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7970
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Mitchell Report to Name Names
« Reply #26 on: October 16, 2007, 08:57:34 pm »
Mitchell, who has spent 1 1/2 years investigating the use of performance-enhancing drugs in baseball,

The only active player known to have met with him was the New York Yankees' Jason Giambi, who did so only after commissioner Bud Selig threatened discipline for remarks in a newspaper interview.

Pretty telling quotes.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Mitchell Report to Name Names
« Reply #27 on: October 17, 2007, 08:09:33 am »
But he is an interested party from the ownership perspective - and probably has some sweet seats at Fenway. The bottomline is that as a person with a stake in one of the most popular franchises in baseball, and part of the establishment of baseball's ownership cabal, he has a conflict of interest.

QFT