Author Topic: PB69 presents "Fire Dave Martinez" (2018)  (Read 56084 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2775 on: August 30, 2018, 06:45:50 am »
Rosenthal reported that Martinez was only making $850,000.

For the 3 years that the Nats are obligated to pay Martinez. They will owe him a total of 2.55 million dollars. Dusty was going to ask for more than that per year since he basically said in the media that he had been working at a discount (which is one of the things that pissed off the Lerners.)

Dusty was not in the top 25%

Note; This is the first listing of all the manager salaries I have even seen. It looks like it was released by USA Today 2 days ago.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/sports/mlb/2018/08/27/mlb-managers-salary-rankings-how-much-paid-2018-baseball-season/1111776002/

1. Mike Scioscia, Los Angeles Angels: $6 million
1. Joe Maddon, Chicago Cubs, $6 million
1. Bruce Bochy, San Francisco Giants: $6 million
4. Terry Francona, Cleveland Indians: $4 million
4. Buck Showalter, Baltimore Orioles: $4 million
6. Ned Yost, Kansas City Royals: $3.7 million
7. Clint Hurdle, Pittsburgh Pirates: $3 million
7. #John Farrell, Boston Red Sox: $3 million
9. Bob Melvin, Oakland A’s: $2.5 million
10. Don Mattingly, Miami Marlins: $2.4 million
11. #Mike Matheny, St. Louis Cardinals: $1.9 million
12. John Gibbons, Toronto Blue Jays: $1.7 million
13. Ron Gardenhire, Detroit Tigers: $1.5 million
13. Craig Counsell, Milwaukee Brewers: $1.5 million
13. Paul Molitor, Minnesota Twins: $1.5 million
13. Bud Black, Colorado Rockies: $1.5 million
17. #Bryan Price, Cincinnati Reds: $1.4 million
18. A.J. Hinch, Houston Astros: $1.2 million
18. Rick Renteria, Chicago White Sox: $1.2 million
20. Aaron Boone, New York Yankees: $1.15 million
21. Kevin Cash, Tampa Bay Rays: $1 million
21. Dave Roberts, Los Angeles Dodgers: $1 million
21. Andy Green, San Diego Padres: $1 million
24. Jeff Bannister, Texas Rangers: $950,000
25. Torey Lovullo, Arizona Diamondbacks: $900,000
26. Davey Martinez, Washington Nationals: $850,000
26. Mickey Callaway, New York Mets: $850,000
28. Gabe Kapler, Philadelphia Phillies: $803,000
29. Alex Cora, Boston Red Sox: $800,000
29. Scott Servais, Seattle Mariners: $800,000
29. Brian Snitker, Atlanta Braves: $800,000
32. @Jim Riggleman, Cincinnati Reds: $700,000 (prorated)
32. @Mike Shildt, St. Louis Cardinals: $700,00 (prorated)

Well damn, wish I had posted that pissy reply about managers salaries being unknown 72 hours earlier. I still think that I've seen different reports over the past three years of what Baker was making, all in the same range, but from about 1.5 to a little over 2.

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2776 on: August 30, 2018, 06:46:14 am »
Quote
I like Gio in that spot. I really did. I didn’t think he was going to give up a grand slam, but hey. I’ve said it before. When we get good starting pitcher, we have a chance to win the ballgame. We were ahead and just couldn’t keep the lead.

We’re playing really, really well, we really are. The boys are playing hard. Playing with a lot of intensity. A lot of energy. I came in, I told them all, I said, ‘Hey, have a good day off. You guys are playing really good. We’ll come back Friday and we’ll do it again.’

Offline rileyn

  • Posts: 4254
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2777 on: August 30, 2018, 06:52:59 am »
I'm not even going to comment on leaving Gio and Cordero in - both moves backfired but it happens.  What bothers me is why we didn't sac bunt in the 8th with runners on 1st and 2nd, and no outs, and down by a run.  That is absolutely the play there.  Let Roark or Max get the bunt down if you don't trust Reynolds to do it.  Even more confusing, he had Taylor bunt in the 6th with a runner on 2nd and no outs.  I would love to hear what he and Chip Hale discuss during game situations.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66853
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2778 on: August 30, 2018, 07:19:40 am »
I'm not even going to comment on leaving Gio and Cordero in - both moves backfired but it happens.  What bothers me is why we didn't sac bunt in the 8th with runners on 1st and 2nd, and no outs, and down by a run.  That is absolutely the play there.  Let Roark or Max get the bunt down if you don't trust Reynolds to do it.  Even more confusing, he had Taylor bunt in the 6th with a runner on 2nd and no outs.  I would love to hear what he and Chip Hale discuss during game situations.

Far bigger issue. Should have kept Reynolds there and gotten a pitcher to bunt. Eaton makes contact so good chance to bring a run in.

The other stuff .... eh whatever

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2779 on: August 30, 2018, 07:41:00 am »
Apparently Davey wanted to “see what Cordero’s got.”  “Stretch him out a bit.” That sounds like something you do in spring training. Not when your season is on life support.

Apparently Davey also thinks the boys are playing well. He’s made a habit of saying this recently.

NEWSFLASH: THE BOYS AREN’T PLAYING WELL. THEY HAVEN’T PLAYED WELL SINCE MAY.

At the end of May they were 33-23. Since then, they’ve gone 34-44.

the season is over - what's left might as well be an extended spring training. 

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2780 on: August 30, 2018, 07:48:40 am »
Let Roark or Max get the bunt down if you don't trust Reynolds to do it. 

Would have extended his short bench.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66853
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2781 on: August 30, 2018, 07:49:33 am »
the season is over - what's left might as well be an extended spring training. 
Agree with this. I might have gotten Cordero a little sooner, but no problem trying to stretch him out a bit, particularly before an off day.

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2782 on: August 30, 2018, 08:17:52 am »
the season is over - what's left might as well be an extended spring training. 

Lerner and Rizzo may have given up but bigger come backs have happened, chances are low but Martínez should still be in win mode. Even if the Nats don't beat the odds we should have been playing to knock the Phillies out.

Offline aspenbubba

  • Posts: 6110
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2783 on: August 30, 2018, 08:26:11 am »
Lerner and Rizzo may have given up but bigger come backs have happened, chances are low but Martínez should still be in win mode. Even if the Nats don't beat the odds we should have been playing to knock the Phillies out.
Yes. Didn't we play the spoiler in '13 or '15?

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2784 on: August 30, 2018, 08:52:28 am »
  Even more confusing, he had Taylor bunt in the 6th with a runner on 2nd and no outs.
I'm sure Taylor bunted on his own.  No way Martinez is that stupid.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28020
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2785 on: August 30, 2018, 09:11:46 am »
Yes. Didn't we play the spoiler in '13 or '15?
Spoiled what?

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18604
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2786 on: August 30, 2018, 09:28:16 am »
Spoiled what?


We managed to knock out the Nationals both years. that's gotta count for something.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17950
  • babble on
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2787 on: August 30, 2018, 09:30:51 am »
Cheating at solitaire...

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2788 on: August 30, 2018, 09:55:13 am »
Cheating at solitaire...

If you're not cheating, you're not trying hard enough to win.

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2789 on: August 30, 2018, 09:57:45 am »
Cheating at solitaire...

How does that work? Is there a cheat code you enter?

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2790 on: August 30, 2018, 05:30:16 pm »

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2791 on: August 30, 2018, 05:56:29 pm »
Finally, a photo of a chart that means something.

Offline aspenbubba

  • Posts: 6110
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2792 on: August 30, 2018, 06:09:54 pm »
Finally, a photo of a chart that means something.
Managers salaries without an attribution. Let’s say it is fairly accurate. The two worst teams in MLB are paying their managers the 5 & 7 th highest salaries. No correlation between paying managers and success.

Offline Elvir Ovcina

  • Posts: 5830
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2793 on: August 30, 2018, 06:37:39 pm »
Managers salaries without an attribution. Let’s say it is fairly accurate. The two worst teams in MLB are paying their managers the 5 & 7 th highest salaries. No correlation between paying managers and success.

I think what you'd see with that chart is that there is a very high correlation between managerial experience and salary.  Managerial experience is indirectly correlated with success, but mostly in a long-term sense: successful managers get jobs over the long term, Manny Acta doesn't.  So the real question is correlation between managerial experience and success on a single-season basis.  That's fairly easily testable for someone with the data in a usable format. 

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2794 on: August 30, 2018, 06:45:20 pm »
Managers salaries without an attribution. Let’s say it is fairly accurate. The two worst teams in MLB are paying their managers the 5 & 7 th highest salaries. No correlation between paying managers and success.

Source is Blue Streak's post. I added together the salaries for the three teams paying two managers.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2795 on: August 30, 2018, 11:44:13 pm »
PowerTroller fails again.  :lmao:

Barves and Philthies at the bottom of the chart, below the Nats, completing contradicting whatever point he was trying to make.  (And teams like the Angels, Orioles, Royals, and Bucs in the top 10.)

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66853
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2796 on: August 31, 2018, 07:07:06 am »
PowerTroller fails again.  :lmao:

Barves and Philthies at the bottom of the chart, below the Nats, completing contradicting whatever point he was trying to make.  (And teams like the Angels, Orioles, Royals, and Bucs in the top 10.)

And the Mariners, who have 75 wins despite having a -42 run differential

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2797 on: August 31, 2018, 07:46:00 am »

Barves and Philthies at the bottom of the chart, below the Nats, completing contradicting whatever point he was trying to make.  (And teams like the Angels, Orioles, Royals, and Bucs in the top 10.)

You give me too much credit, I added up the #s for the three teams with two managers to get the average salary per team but saw nothing new or notable in the results. I had no point to make which is why I posted the pic with no comment. The salary reveal only confirms what everyone already knew, that experienced and successful managers make more than new managers, that past success does not guarantee future success, and that Lerner took his 97 win/CBT paying team and went cheap with the manager hire.


Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #2799 on: August 31, 2018, 12:21:11 pm »
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/take-a-good-look-at-these-nationals-you-wont-be-seeing-a-lot-of-them-next-season/2018/08/30/7d32cf66-ac83-11e8-b1da-ff7faa680710_story.html?utm_term=.2d22df3c7a50

another article bemoaning the firing of Dusty

I didn't read any bemoaning.  What I got from the article is a strong case not to sign Harper, when that money can otherwise  be put to such good use given the crop of free agents available.