Author Topic: PB69 presents "Fire Dave Martinez" (2018) (Read 55928 times)

NatsAllThe Way · « **Reply #3175 on:** October 23, 2018, 05:33:42 pm »

On the bright side, I'm really going to keep you guys entertained with my over-the-top negativity for another 162.

Ray D · « **Reply #3176 on:** October 23, 2018, 05:42:49 pm »

Quote from: aspenbubba on October 23, 2018, 01:35:16 pm

I agree that some of the lower management people may log on occasionally to take a pulse but upper management could give a rats' ass what we think.

I don't expect them to care what we think nor to consult fans on decisions like who should be the manager. I DO expect them to make rational decisions. This decision essentially tanks the 2019 season. That's not rational.

PowerBoater69 · « **Reply #3177 on:** October 23, 2018, 07:38:52 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on October 23, 2018, 05:42:49 pm

I don't expect them to care what we think nor to consult fans on decisions like who should be the manager. I DO expect them to make rational decisions. This decision essentially tanks the 2019 season. That's not rational.

Depends on the goal of the decision, if the intent is to win more games in 2019 bringing Martinez back is not a choice that anyone would make. So what is the true motivation? Based on this decision, along with the news from last week that Janes reported that the Nats plan to not even come close to the salary cap the team appears to be heading into a rebuild.

Ray D · « **Reply #3178 on:** October 24, 2018, 08:47:27 am »

Quote from: PowerBoater69 on October 23, 2018, 07:38:52 pm

Depends on the goal of the decision, if the intent is to win more games in 2019 bringing Martinez back is not a choice that anyone would make. So what is the true motivation? Based on this decision, along with the news from last week that Janes reported that the Nats plan to not even come close to the salary cap the team appears to be heading into a rebuild.

Like I said, "rational". That isn't rational thinking. Yes, if there's going to be a rebuild then keeping the cheap manager in place is rational. A rebuild at this stage is completely irrational and I don't believe that's the plan. On the other hand, if the plan is to win, then keeping the cheap manager, because he's cheap, is irrational thinking. So I can't figure out what's going on.

Slateman · « **Reply #3179 on:** October 24, 2018, 08:51:14 am »

The playoffs are showing exactly why Dusty was let go. He doesn't survive in this environment.

Ray D · « **Reply #3180 on:** October 24, 2018, 02:59:42 pm »

Quote from: Slateman on October 24, 2018, 08:51:14 am

The playoffs are showing exactly why Dusty was let go. He doesn't survive in this environment.

Dusty is ancient history, the discussion isn't about him, it's about whether Martinez is fit to manage. But since you mention it, if Dusty was let go because he couldn't get past the the first round of the playoffs, why is Martinez retained when he cannot even get to the playoffs? It's not a new question, I know, but nobody has answered it.

UMDNats · « **Reply #3181 on:** October 24, 2018, 03:00:14 pm »

Clearly we should just rotate managers on a yearly basis depending on how far they go. It can be like our own game of Survivor!

Natsinpwc · « **Reply #3182 on:** October 24, 2018, 03:16:09 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on October 24, 2018, 02:59:42 pm

Dusty is ancient history, the discussion isn't about him, it's about whether Martinez is fit to manage. But since you mention it, if Dusty was let go because he couldn't get past the the first round of the playoffs, why is Martinez retained when he cannot even get to the playoffs? It's not a new question, I know, but nobody has answered it.

Because they aren’t going to admit a mistake after one year. A slow start and he is gone.

bluestreak · « **Reply #3183 on:** October 24, 2018, 03:27:24 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on October 24, 2018, 02:59:42 pm

Dusty is ancient history, the discussion isn't about him, it's about whether Martinez is fit to manage. But since you mention it, if Dusty was let go because he couldn't get past the the first round of the playoffs, why is Martinez retained when he cannot even get to the playoffs? It's not a new question, I know, but nobody has answered it.

Because there is no answer, other than the fact that they won't get anyone good because it's a certified crapshow and if they screwed up this hire so badly, I have no reason to expect they won't screw up another. At least Martinez has some experience now which is probably more than you can say for whoever is going to be brought in. If he sucks in 2019 I imagine he will be canned in short order followed by Rizzo.

Ray D · « **Reply #3184 on:** October 24, 2018, 03:33:30 pm »

Quote from: Natsinpwc on October 24, 2018, 03:16:09 pm

A slow start and he is gone.

A slow start is too late. They will have wasted all of spring training.

Natsinpwc · « **Reply #3185 on:** October 24, 2018, 04:02:14 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on October 24, 2018, 03:33:30 pm

A slow start is too late. They will have wasted all of spring training.

It’s still early.

Slateman · « **Reply #3186 on:** October 24, 2018, 04:21:04 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on October 24, 2018, 02:59:42 pm

Dusty is ancient history, the discussion isn't about him, it's about whether Martinez is fit to manage. But since you mention it, if Dusty was let go because he couldn't get past the the first round of the playoffs, why is Martinez retained when he cannot even get to the playoffs? It's not a new question, I know, but nobody has answered it.

Because this season's inability to reach the playoffs is because of the injuries and complete lack of performance by the players.

KnorrForYourMoney · « **Reply #3187 on:** October 24, 2018, 06:12:36 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on October 24, 2018, 02:59:42 pm

Dusty is ancient history, the discussion isn't about him, it's about whether Martinez is fit to manage. But since you mention it, if Dusty was let go because he couldn't get past the the first round of the playoffs, why is Martinez retained when he cannot even get to the playoffs? It's not a new question, I know, but nobody has answered it.

I know you're fairly obtuse, but you're comparing one year of failure to two years of playoff failures with the Nats and years upon years of chokes and failures with other teams.

Ray D · « **Reply #3188 on:** October 24, 2018, 06:58:50 pm »

Quote from: KnorrForYourMoney on October 24, 2018, 06:12:36 pm

I know you're fairly obtuse,

I thought you and I had reached an equilibrium where I don't respond to you and you don't respond to me. Can we keep it that way? You're an jerk.

KnorrForYourMoney · « **Reply #3189 on:** October 24, 2018, 11:27:04 pm »

Don't ask stupid questions with obvious answers to them and pretend that you can't get a valid answer, then.

GburgNatsFan · « **Reply #3190 on:** October 25, 2018, 08:49:03 am »

Count Walewski · « **Reply #3191 on:** October 25, 2018, 08:58:14 am »

Facebook memories reminded me that on this day in 2013 the Nationals hired Matt Williams.

blue911 · « **Reply #3192 on:** October 25, 2018, 09:07:11 am »

Quote from: Count Walewski on October 25, 2018, 08:58:14 am

Facebook memories reminded me that on this day in 2013 the Nationals hired Matt Williams.

Another reason Mark Zuckerberg should be in jail.

DCFan · « **Reply #3193 on:** October 25, 2018, 06:49:17 pm »

Quote from: GburgNatsFan on October 25, 2018, 08:49:03 am

Jeebus this thread is beyond tiresome at this point.

rileyn · « **Reply #3194 on:** October 26, 2018, 06:31:44 am »

Quote from: DCFan on October 25, 2018, 06:49:17 pm

Jeebus this thread is beyond tiresome at this point.

True. Bottom line is Martinez was a poor hire, did a poor job, and as fans all we can do is hope that he somehow morphs into a capable manager next year.

sixthree175 · « **Reply #3195 on:** October 26, 2018, 05:27:06 pm »

Quote from: bluestreak on October 24, 2018, 03:27:24 pm

Because there is no answer, other than the fact that they won't get anyone good because it's a certified crapshow and if they screwed up this hire so badly, I have no reason to expect they won't screw up another. At least Martinez has some experience now which is probably more than you can say for whoever is going to be brought in. If he sucks in 2019 I imagine he will be canned in short order followed by Rizzo.

If the roster isn't significantly improved (pitching, catching, 2nd Base) over the current group, Martinez will be set up for failure in 2019. If the luxury tax threshold is the reason again for not making the necessary deals, who gets blamed for that?

HalfSmokes · « **Reply #3196 on:** October 26, 2018, 05:33:23 pm »

Quote from: sixthree175 on October 26, 2018, 05:27:06 pm

If the roster isn't significantly improved (pitching, catching, 2nd Base) over the current group, Martinez will be set up for failure in 2019. If the luxury tax threshold is the reason again for not making the necessary deals, who gets blamed for that?

Martine or the the lerners- Rizzo is always blameless

UMDNats · « **Reply #3197 on:** October 26, 2018, 05:59:14 pm »

I actually think that assuming we make at least some decent moves/basic-level moves this offseason, we're going to be better than 2018 even though on paper we will look worse.

tzinc · « **Reply #3198 on:** October 26, 2018, 07:18:11 pm »

people just keep bashing dusty
every chance they get

the only manager in nats history to win 2 divsions in a row i

yes we don't need a guy like that

the Dodgers kept Roberts despite his playoff failure and guess what they are back again

PowerBoater69 · « **Reply #3199 on:** December 12, 2018, 09:08:18 am »

Our manager has been skipping his Toast Master sessions. Here is the interview from the winter meetings.

https://www.pscp.tv/w/1OyJAyknOdWJb

He's trying to avoid the "little things" crutch, substituting "fundamentals" in its place, up until the end when he went with a burst of little things. Does he know that they went 18-24 in one run games, so winning half of them still would have put them out of the wild card? At least no promises of a World Series victory so far this year, that was a staple of his interviews last off season.

The comment about having a spring training day with no hitting, he's mentioned that at least a couple times. Someone should clue him in that that is just a gimmick, not really that much different from the camels. He's not going to turn this team around with some brilliant trick.

The response that concerned me most was when he said that players avoided him last year. That doesn't make any sense. Guys are competing for playing time, you would think that they'd be wanting to get in the manager's ear. Even if he is the most annoying boss on the planet, he fills out the line up card, he makes the call to the bullpen, and he lobbies Rizzo for guys he wants on the 25 man.