Author Topic: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3  (Read 27990 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #250: September 25, 2014, 09:47:03 PM »
My guess is Soriano...

I'm afraid so  ...    :panic:

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #251: September 25, 2014, 09:47:15 PM »
are we going to see Soriano or drew in the 9th?

Drew.  He hasn't pitched in a while.

Offline Jordanz Meatballz

  • Posts: 4996
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #252: September 25, 2014, 09:49:01 PM »
Schierholtz is trending up lately :)

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 41667
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #253: September 25, 2014, 09:49:12 PM »
campbell taking dribbling lessons.  Always wanted to be a point guard

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #254: September 25, 2014, 09:49:15 PM »
Schierholtz is trending up lately :)

NEW NATE!

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33855
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #255: September 25, 2014, 09:49:45 PM »
Yeah if you're booting Hairston that's a given.

Unless you're one of the durned fools that wants a prospect in there.

I reserve the right to be a durn fool even if I don't want a prospect in there.   :panic:

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #256: September 25, 2014, 09:50:07 PM »
Keeriste FP, a guy who makes $5,000,000 a year catches that ball.     :stir:

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33855
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #257: September 25, 2014, 09:51:56 PM »
Keeriste FP, a guy who makes $5,000,000 a year catches that ball.     :stir:

I've heard of a Barista, but what the hell is a Keeriste? 


Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #258: September 25, 2014, 09:52:34 PM »
I reserve the right to be a durn fool even if I don't want a prospect in there.   :panic:

I find it funny that this board HATES the bench and then gets giant prospect boners for unproven talent.  It's cute.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #259: September 25, 2014, 09:52:49 PM »
Why would a position player bunt with 2 strikes?

Offline NatsAllThe Way

  • Posts: 14529
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #260: September 25, 2014, 09:52:59 PM »
What?  Why bunt with 2 strikes?  What's happening?

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33855
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #261: September 25, 2014, 09:53:16 PM »
Why the @%$& is Taylor bunting with 2 strikes?  Eat that, bunt lovers.

Offline nfotiu

  • Posts: 5060
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #262: September 25, 2014, 09:53:18 PM »
That was pretty crappy all around.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #263: September 25, 2014, 09:53:28 PM »
Why would a position player bunt with 2 strikes?

Because he was given the signal to.  That one was clearly a direct order.

Offline aussienatsfan

  • Posts: 7094
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #264: September 25, 2014, 09:53:46 PM »
what the hell nobody including pitchers should ever get done for strike 3 bunting i don't care whethere it's matss instructions or not

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #265: September 25, 2014, 09:53:52 PM »
I've heard of a Barista, but what the hell is a Keeriste? 



It's Aramaic.

Offline NatsAllThe Way

  • Posts: 14529
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #266: September 25, 2014, 09:54:05 PM »
Because he was given the signal to.  That one was clearly a direct order.

Not blaming Taylor.  But why would the signal be on?

Offline nfotiu

  • Posts: 5060
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #267: September 25, 2014, 09:54:27 PM »
I've heard of a Barista, but what the hell is a Keeriste? 



The guy they put on a stick.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33855
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #268: September 25, 2014, 09:54:48 PM »
I find it funny that this board HATES the bench and then gets giant prospect boners for unproven talent.  It's cute.

Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton were both elected President. I know you're a Canuck, but the lesson is about human nature.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #269: September 25, 2014, 09:54:50 PM »
Not blaming Taylor.  But why would the signal be on?

I guess they really really wanted to get people moved over so Danny doesn't GIDP and then Face gets to drive them in.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #270: September 25, 2014, 09:56:18 PM »
Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton were both elected President. I know you're a Canuck, but the lesson is about human nature.

...  or Bush   ...  another southern goob'ner  :)

Offline stealyerbase

  • Posts: 5398
  • YUMMY! Good for you too!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #271: September 25, 2014, 09:57:38 PM »
I guess they really really wanted to get people moved over so Danny doesn't GIDP and then Face gets to drive them in.
BINGO!

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #272: September 25, 2014, 09:58:25 PM »
Zimmerman sucks  ...   :P

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #273: September 25, 2014, 09:58:25 PM »
Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton were both elected President. I know you're a Canuck, but the lesson is about human nature.

Clinton was re-elected though!  It's not always about new blood.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33855
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #274: September 25, 2014, 09:58:26 PM »
...  or Bush   ...  another southern goob'ner  :)

Well, Bush did have enough Daddy money to buy a baseball team, so that ought to be worth sumthin.