Author Topic: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1  (Read 23874 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mmzznnxx

  • Posts: 11912
  • lol Nats
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #625 on: June 23, 2014, 11:37:47 pm »


Luckily we won't win 120 because then I wouldn't remember crap.

Offline stealyerbase

  • Posts: 5398
  • YUMMY! Good for you too!
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #626 on: June 23, 2014, 11:38:13 pm »
New millennium, new league, new tradition. I like that.
I made T-shirts with that slogan before the 2012 playoffs, wore one at the playoffs while sitting in the Presidents Club. The only people who noticed it? The Lerners! They loved it!

Online imref

  • Posts: 47430
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #627 on: June 23, 2014, 11:43:36 pm »
Luckily we won't win 120 because then I wouldn't remember crap.

:rofl:

Offline welch

  • Posts: 18058
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #628 on: June 24, 2014, 12:16:46 am »
I watched through 5...didn't believe Gio could make ALR's 3-run homer last out to a win. Conclusion: never predict that Gio is down and out. Never. The Nats can field and the bullpen is great.

Woohoo!!!!!!!!

If you young'uns will forget 2007, 08, 09 etc, I'll forget 1955 - 1968 (minus 1960, which was special).

These Nats are a whole different class of Washington team. Glory! And for the folks who remember 1971, and 1961, and 1957: isn't this fun? Some like the Nats teams my Dad grew up with in the late '20s and early '30s. Shirley Povich once wrote that the "First in war, first in peace, last in etc" was a stale vaudeville joke that make no sense after Clark Griffith, "The Old Fox", was hired to manage the team about 1912 or 1913.

For Clark, and Walter Johnson, and Sam Rice, and Goose Goslin, and Joe Judge. And George case, Mickey Vernon, Cecil Travis, Buddy Lewis, Walt Masterson, the kid Early Wynn (my fingers don't want to type that, because I remember Wynn  pitching for the White Sox when he was 40 years old.)

Old Griff ran out of money about the time that MLB adopted farm teams. He couldn't compete, just like Connie Mack.  But from about 1913 to about 1941, the Nats were nothing to sneer at.

Neither is this team.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47430
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #629 on: June 24, 2014, 12:49:02 am »
FP had the line of the night - "if Gio returns to form, then what?"

strap yourselves in, this could be a fun ride.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #630 on: June 24, 2014, 08:01:53 am »
I really like ray knight. Good ol' boy from Georgia.

BiL is really a self loathing (understandable) undercover braves fan.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45563
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #631 on: June 24, 2014, 08:30:55 am »
WTF. Braun is Jewish, FYI.
Just half.  the half with the needlemarks we're leaving for you guys.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #632 on: June 24, 2014, 08:42:28 am »
Just half.  the half with the needlemarks we're leaving for you guys.

The other half was too cheap to spring for the juice.  :stir:

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45563
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #633 on: June 24, 2014, 08:44:20 am »
The other half was too cheap to spring for the juice.  :stir:
Well, when you think about it, it was a lab in South Florida.  I think they were targetting.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47430
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #634 on: June 24, 2014, 08:52:28 am »
New millennium, new league, new tradition. I like that.   

i'm guessing the Nats have been one of the winningest teams in baseball this decade (starting with 2011).

Offline captkirk42

  • Posts: 1627
    • Curly W Cards
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #635 on: June 24, 2014, 09:47:56 am »
i'm guessing the Nats have been one of the winningest teams in baseball this decade (starting with 2011).

If they are the rest of the League's fans don't know it. They just think about the Nats losing to St. Louis in the '12 playoffs. They probably also think that Philly is still a hot team. Gee where did their boy Werth go to?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #636 on: June 24, 2014, 11:54:35 am »
i'm guessing the Nats have been one of the winningest teams in baseball this decade (starting with 2011).

This decade starts in 2010.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30893
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #637 on: June 24, 2014, 12:02:55 pm »
This decade starts in 2010.

No...the century / millennium began on 1/1/01 and the decade on 1/1/11.


Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45563
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #638 on: June 24, 2014, 04:24:49 pm »
need the comparison to prior seasons

Online imref

  • Posts: 47430
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #639 on: June 24, 2014, 04:27:16 pm »
This decade starts in 2010.

no, it started in 2011 (there's no year "0" so calendars start with 1 as the first year.   The first decade was years 1-10, and so on...

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #640 on: June 24, 2014, 04:29:07 pm »
So, was the year zero BC or AD?

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45563
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 1
« Reply #641 on: June 24, 2014, 04:34:49 pm »
So, was the year zero BC or AD?
There is no year zero.  I'm not sure if the Romans had the concept of zero.