Author Topic: The Matt Williams Effect  (Read 36396 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47627
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #200 on: April 25, 2014, 08:12:57 am »
In everyones opinion what is the single worst mistake Williams has made so far as manager. Pick just one....his most major screw up thus far.

 leaving Clippard in against Ibanez is the biggest one so far IMHO.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45825
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #201 on: April 25, 2014, 08:58:42 am »
honestly, at this point, I don't know whether you can tell much about how well this offense is going to do over the year.  To some extent, the Miami and Mets series probably jack up the overall stats, while the run of great pitchers / tough match ups they've faced distorts it down. 

For what it is worth, the team is outscoring Atlanta by a half a run a game (4.26 v. 3.76), and is scoring a higher percentage of baserunners (12% v. 11%).
http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/MLB/2014-situational-batting.shtml

The 2014 offense is slightly above MLB average in runs per game (4.26 v. 4.20).   That 12% in scoring baserunners is below MLB average (14% is average), but is the same as St Louis and just below Boston (13%).  Last year, all teams ended up within 1% of average (14%) except St. Louis (17%) and 4 very poor offenses - ChC, MIA, MN, SEA (12%). 

Cashing in is important, and the best offenses at cashing in runners seem to be the higher scoring ones.  none of the teams that were below average in base runner scoring % were above average in runs scored in 2013, while all 8 of the teams that were 15% or higher scored more than MLB average in runs per game.  I would not like to see that 12% continue in 2014, even if our overall run scoring is for now above average.  I expect we will be around 13- 15% by the end of the year, because that is where most teams end up.


Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66836
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #202 on: April 25, 2014, 09:16:41 am »
honestly, at this point, I don't know whether you can tell much about how well this offense is going to do over the year.  To some extent, the Miami and Mets series probably jack up the overall stats, while the run of great pitchers / tough match ups they've faced distorts it down. 

For what it is worth, the team is outscoring Atlanta by a half a run a game (4.26 v. 3.76), and is scoring a higher percentage of baserunners (12% v. 11%).
http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/MLB/2014-situational-batting.shtml

The 2014 offense is slightly above MLB average in runs per game (4.26 v. 4.20).   That 12% in scoring baserunners is below MLB average (14% is average), but is the same as St Louis and just below Boston (13%).  Last year, all teams ended up within 1% of average (14%) except St. Louis (17%) and 4 very poor offenses - ChC, MIA, MN, SEA (12%). 

Cashing in is important, and the best offenses at cashing in runners seem to be the higher scoring ones.  none of the teams that were below average in base runner scoring % were above average in runs scored in 2013, while all 8 of the teams that were 15% or higher scored more than MLB average in runs per game.  I would not like to see that 12% continue in 2014, even if our overall run scoring is for now above average.  I expect we will be around 13- 15% by the end of the year, because that is where most teams end up.


A lot of that is offset by some blowouts against the Marlins and Mets.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #203 on: April 25, 2014, 09:27:10 am »
In everyones opinion what is the single worst mistake Williams has made so far as manager. Pick just one....his most major screw up thus far.
His public rant against Harper.   benching him was fine. He should have ranted in a closed door meeting.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17948
  • babble on
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #204 on: April 25, 2014, 09:39:51 am »
Yep.  Of course it would leak out anyways...
His public rant against Harper.   benching him was fine. He should have ranted in a closed door meeting.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #205 on: April 25, 2014, 09:53:01 am »
Yep.  Of course it would leak out anyways...

I think that I would have had plenty of respect for Williams hearing a leaked report that he let his feeling be known in a closed door meeting. I lost some respect  hearing it directly from him.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17948
  • babble on
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #206 on: April 25, 2014, 09:54:24 am »
Yes, exactly.  Ditto with Oates and Halak in that other source of Washington sports angst.
I think that I would have had plenty of respect for Williams hearing a leaked report that he let his feeling be known in a closed door meeting. I lost some respect  hearing it directly from him.

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 19504
  • Believe!!!
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #207 on: April 25, 2014, 10:04:49 am »
I hated him benching Harper.  HATED IT. I know some people were all "oh yea that'll teach him" well it hasn't done a darned thing and I thought it made Williams look like a petty little man, and then the public dressing down afterward was just over the top nonsense. 

Offline vicki4471

  • Posts: 757
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #208 on: April 25, 2014, 10:10:07 am »
I hated him benching Harper.  HATED IT. I know some people were all "oh yea that'll teach him" well it hasn't done a darned thing and I thought it made Williams look like a petty little man, and then the public dressing down afterward was just over the top nonsense.

Completely agree.    Oh and for the record, I forget who it was, I'm thinking Lobaton maybe... but last night someone was clearly out running to second and completely stopped before reaching second base. Is lack of hustle acceptable in people not named Harper? I mean no one said a word about it, it was just something I noticed.. Like I said, dont remember who it was just know for sure I remembered seeing someone not run the play completely out.

Offline Dschmiel

  • Posts: 111
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #209 on: April 25, 2014, 10:13:32 am »
Not that it isn't true, but I think it's a misguided way of thinking. First of all no team should be banking on having a healthy lineup, it's a pitiful excuse. Second of all, if we're banking on Ramos and Zimmerman being completely healthy the whole season that's just poor planning.



42 HR/140 RBI combined in '13
48 HR/135 RBI combined in '13

The first line: Justin Upton and Evan Gattis
The second line: Wilson Ramos and Ryan Zimmerman

Take away JUp and Gattis from the Braves right now and they are probably around a .500 team. 

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #210 on: April 25, 2014, 10:17:08 am »
42 HR/140 RBI combined in '13
48 HR/135 RBI combined in '13

The first line: Justin Upton and Evan Gattis
The second line: Wilson Ramos and Ryan Zimmerman

Take away JUp and Gattis from the Braves right now and they are probably around a .500 team. 

:shrug:
113
25
78
1

Ramos' games played 2011-2014 - counting on him to play full time is at best wishful thinking

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #211 on: April 25, 2014, 10:21:38 am »
42 HR/140 RBI combined in '13
48 HR/135 RBI combined in '13

The first line: Justin Upton and Evan Gattis
The second line: Wilson Ramos and Ryan Zimmerman

Take away JUp and Gattis from the Braves right now and they are probably around a .500 team. 

Take away Strasburg and Zimmerman (Beachy and Medlen) from the Nats and we're still behind the Barves even without Gattis and Upton.    Add Werth, LaRoche, Espi, Harper, Rendon to the Barves and they're undefeated.   If "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Chirstmas.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #212 on: April 25, 2014, 10:32:06 am »
I hated him benching Harper.  HATED IT. I know some people were all "oh yea that'll teach him" well it hasn't done a darned thing and I thought it made Williams look like a petty little man, and then the public dressing down afterward was just over the top nonsense. 

Well we don't really know, but I don't think you can disconnect the benching from the dressing down.  The two combined didn't achieve the desired results, but if it had been just a benching (with a closed door meeting) the results may have been different.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #213 on: April 25, 2014, 11:12:18 am »
Take away Strasburg and Zimmerman (Beachy and Medlen) from the Nats and we're still behind the Barves even without Gattis and Upton.    Add Werth, LaRoche, Espi, Harper, Rendon to the Barves and they're undefeated.   If "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Chirstmas.

:clap:  The standings only reflect reality not bullcrap scenarios.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47627
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #214 on: May 05, 2014, 03:31:44 pm »
Quote
Matt Williams just crushed a homer over the 'natitude' sign in LF at #Nats Park. #stillgotit

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66836
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #215 on: May 05, 2014, 03:56:16 pm »

Good. Maybe we can activate him to hit leadoff.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 12286
  • Sunshine Squad 2025
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #216 on: May 06, 2014, 10:53:05 am »
:clap:  The standings only reflect reality not bullcrap scenarios.
                        W    L  PCT   GB

Washington      18  14 .563  -
 
Atlanta             17 14 .548  0.5

Miami               17 15 .531  1.0

NY Mets            16 15 .516  1.5
 
Philadelphia      15 15 .500  2.0

 :clap:

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #217 on: May 06, 2014, 12:01:45 pm »
                        W    L  PCT   GB

Washington      18  14 .563  -
 
Atlanta             17 14 .548  0.5

Miami               17 15 .531  1.0

NY Mets            16 15 .516  1.5
 
Philadelphia      15 15 .500  2.0

 :clap:

Been waitin' a long time to post this, eh?     :)

Offline stealyerbase

  • Posts: 5398
  • YUMMY! Good for you too!
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #218 on: May 06, 2014, 12:45:44 pm »
Been waitin' a long time to post this, eh?     :)
Looks good! When I get tomorrow's paper with the updated statistics out here in the country I'll probably spread out the sports page on the floor open to the standings and roll around on it for awhile. I am an enthusiastic fanatic!

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #219 on: May 06, 2014, 12:49:54 pm »
Been waitin' a long time to post this, eh?     :)

Long memories, one of the things that make WNFF great.    :P

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 19504
  • Believe!!!
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #220 on: May 06, 2014, 01:08:51 pm »
Long memories, one of the things that make WNFF great.    :P

So true lol!
Oh but since I'm quick to bash him I'll be the first to say I thought Williams did a perfect job with the pitchers last night, from what I recall anyway  :lol:

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #221 on: May 06, 2014, 01:12:27 pm »
Anything (stupid) you say can, should, and will be used against you in the court of WNFF opinion.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #222 on: May 06, 2014, 02:01:19 pm »
Been waitin' a long time to post this, eh?     :)

But what I said was completely true. It's unbelievable that some people think some of us really want the Nats to fail. I guess too much of anything can impair judgment.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #223 on: May 06, 2014, 02:16:29 pm »
Quote
Adam Kilgore ‏@AdamKilgoreWP  2m
Ross Detwiler, a pretty decent left-handed starter, ranks 95th out of 98 relievers in average leverage index. http://wapo.st/RoIntz

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #224 on: May 06, 2014, 02:52:48 pm »
But what I said was completely true. It's unbelievable that some people think some of us really want the Nats to fail. I guess too much of anything can impair judgment.

I hear ya.    Some folks think any personal opinions that question the goings on are LOD'ers or want the Nats to fail.    There may be a few of those people runnin' around but for the most part, this is Natsylvania.    :P    My comment was tongue in cheek  ...   My intent was to imply that some have been waiting over a year to pull out a standing that shows the Nats in first (not Smithian particularly).    Don't remember seeing the standings posted last year.