Author Topic: The Matt Williams Effect  (Read 36464 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #150 on: April 22, 2014, 11:51:55 am »
Zuck noted that Williams went and rewatched the pitch to Ibanez before coming out to talk to the press last night, he said it was a good pitch, out of the zone, low and away, and Ibanez just got to it.  It wasn't as if Clippard left a ball hanging over the plate.  Still, hard to understand why he left Clippard in given he was struggling and his history against Ibanez.

When I heard Williams' comment, I remember thinking "Yeah, right  ...  of the whole game, you watched that pitch before coming to the post-game press conference."

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 19504
  • Believe!!!
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #151 on: April 22, 2014, 12:51:17 pm »
I've studied Matt Williams for a month now and he's about to double-down and bat Clippard 2nd.
:lmao:

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #152 on: April 22, 2014, 01:27:54 pm »
I don't really think Clippard was the problem yesterday. Error on Desmond, a soft hit (that's an out with fielders at normal depth with no one on), a pop up and the one good hit. He's been struggling but last night wasn't really his fault.

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 3984
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #153 on: April 22, 2014, 01:50:47 pm »
As much as people are saying that Clip's just not missing bats anymore he's still inducing swinging strikes at his career rate (13% which is well above average) and has struck out 35% of the batters he's faced (Kimbrel struck out 38% last season, yay small sample size).

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #154 on: April 22, 2014, 02:30:26 pm »
I've studied Matt Williams for a month now and he's about to double-down and bat Clippard 2nd.

Ron Rivera style!

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #155 on: April 22, 2014, 04:09:17 pm »
I don't really think Clippard was the problem yesterday. Error on Desmond, a soft hit (that's an out with fielders at normal depth with no one on), a pop up and the one good hit. He's been struggling but last night wasn't really his fault.

He walked the 190 hitter to load the bases and bring up Ibanez who owns him - that's unforgivable - at that point Williams HAS to pull him.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #156 on: April 22, 2014, 04:10:23 pm »
He walked the 190 hitter to load the bases and bring up Ibanez who owns him - that's unforgivable - at that point Williams HAS to pull him.

Shouldn't have came to that. Defense and fluke hits are what did him in.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18599
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #157 on: April 22, 2014, 04:10:34 pm »
He walked the 190 hitter to load the bases and bring up Ibanez who owns him - that's unforgivable - at that point Williams HAS to pull him.

considering there are 3 lefties in the bullpen.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #158 on: April 22, 2014, 04:12:47 pm »
Shouldn't have came to that.

While I agree in concept, that's not relevant because it did come to that. crap happens all the time. You have to man up and get the out. You cannot walk the 190 hitter in that situation - you simply cannot. That's on Clippard, completely.

But there's lots of blame to go around in that inning - Williams, Desmond, Clippard - one big crap bag full of FAIL

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2936
  • Too Stressed to care.
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #159 on: April 22, 2014, 04:27:25 pm »
He walked the 190 hitter to load the bases and bring up Ibanez who owns him - that's unforgivable - at that point Williams HAS to pull him.
The Nats need to come up with a plan for Ibanez. He's always killed us and slashes 287/336/583 at Nats Park lifetime....

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #160 on: April 22, 2014, 08:54:52 pm »
While I agree in concept, that's not relevant because it did come to that. crap happens all the time. You have to man up and get the out. You cannot walk the 190 hitter in that situation - you simply cannot. That's on Clippard, completely.


It's not like he isn't trying hard enough, he's just making way too many mistakes at the moment.  Of course he should have been pulled, his body language screamed "no confidence" after the Pujols steal.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #161 on: April 22, 2014, 09:09:54 pm »
It's not like he isn't trying hard enough, he's just making way too many mistakes at the moment.  Of course he should have been pulled, his body language screamed "no confidence" after the Pujols steal.

I'm quite certain that Clippard doesn't wake up in the morning and thinks - Gee I hope I suck today!

I put the walk on Clippard
I put the Ibanez double on Williams for not pulling Clippard after the walk

It's obvious he's trying and he's been a total beast for the Nats for years. But he does this, he has really bad patches. He needs to be put in low leverage situations until he gets his mojo back - I'm sure that he will at some point.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #162 on: April 22, 2014, 09:53:33 pm »
Lineup needs more shuffling

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #163 on: April 22, 2014, 09:55:17 pm »

Offline BigMeech

  • Posts: 3771
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #164 on: April 23, 2014, 01:31:19 am »
I'm convinced that Williams was only hired b/c he was working for the Diamondbacks.  Rizzo couldn't resist.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47631
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #165 on: April 23, 2014, 08:27:20 am »
i caught part of Williams on WJFK this morning, he said his two biggest worries right now are the defense and falling behind early in so many games.  Couldn't really explain the defensive woes, said everyone is working hard and he's afraid of the team tightening up because they are so afraid of making an error.  Also said they are stretching out Trienan at Syracuse so he can be ready to start.  He didn't give much of an endorsement of Jordan, it wouldn't be surprising to see Trienan take Jordan's next turn in the rotation; 4-5 innings of Trienen > 4-5 innings of Jordan right now.  He picked Werth as his breakout player of the week (two previous week's picks were Harper and RZ, so get ready for a Werth trip to the DL).

Offline WhiteWhale

  • Posts: 1168
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #166 on: April 23, 2014, 11:26:04 am »
...We have talent, and IMO we have a Manager who is straight with the guys...I trust Rizzo, and by proxy trust Matt Williams....Where we are, is a lot better than where we were, and I think that trend will continue.

yeah, F all that S, what was I thinking. Meds must have been working overtime yesterday.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47631
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #167 on: April 23, 2014, 11:54:37 am »
the matt williams effect:

2013: 10-11
2014: 11-10

Williams is a +1 WAR manager.

Offline mmzznnxx

  • Posts: 11912
  • lol Nats
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #168 on: April 23, 2014, 11:58:11 am »
the matt williams effect:

2013: 10-11
2014: 11-10

Williams is a +1 WAR manager.

I know you're being facetious but I could easily see someone saying that.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47631
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #169 on: April 23, 2014, 01:46:24 pm »
I know you're being facetious but I could easily see someone saying that.

:)

Offline welch

  • Posts: 18094
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #170 on: April 23, 2014, 02:53:12 pm »
- I liked FP's comment last night: someone bunts and the defense goes crazy. That's the right idea, and better than Earl-Weaver-Homer-Ball. 
- The push-it base running is also good. (I hate the 1950s AL style station-to-station game.)
- Fielding: Unbelievable. Desmond and Rendon are not really this bad, but right now I want Espinosa at 2B, Espinosa at SS, and a third Espinosa at third. Maybe, more seriously, put Espi at SS, Walters at 2B for a few games, and let Desmond practice his swing?
- Taylor Jordan needs some work at AAA. Post says Fister will return about May 7? Syracuse had a report that Treinen would start one of the next games. So...

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #171 on: April 23, 2014, 03:24:30 pm »
- I liked FP's comment last night: someone bunts and the defense goes crazy. That's the right idea, and better than Earl-Weaver-Homer-Ball. 
Only if it's unexpected. Sacrifice bunts rarely take anybody off guard and rarely cause chaos. The bunt can be an effective weapon, but the sacrifice bunt not as much as the old guard yells that it is.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #172 on: April 23, 2014, 03:32:16 pm »
Only if it's unexpected.

Or if the defense is not up to the task of handling it, expected or not.  Bunting can be an effective tool at lower levels - high school, etc.  But few major league teams are ill-prepared to handle it.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #173 on: April 23, 2014, 03:34:21 pm »
So the bunt can be an effective tool against Washington.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Matt Williams Effect
« Reply #174 on: April 23, 2014, 03:37:15 pm »
So the bunt can be an effective tool against Washington.
I am not ready to accept that the Nats cannot handle the bunt, based on one or two mishandlings so far this season.  Until proven wrong, I cling to the belief that they practiced it endlessly in spring training.