Hopefully we'll see the text today. The $25 million has already been raised as an issue in the first case so I don't see how Angelos has any grounds to withhold payment after the courts sent the dispute back to MLB arbitration. I'm surprised that Lerner waited a year to sue, probably trying to stay in good with the other MLB ownership groups.
The Nats tried to break off from MASN when Angelos refused to honor the terms of the first arbitration, but at least at that time MASN was still paying fees under the original rate structure. The judge blocked the Nats from taking any action while that case was open, but this is different, complete non payment has to be cause to break the deal.
On the bright side, the Nats appear to be thriving financially and the Os are in a state of collapse.