Author Topic: Fielder  (Read 288431 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1275 on: January 05, 2012, 02:02:17 pm »
Because loosing one player shouldn't submarine a season

Morse was finally loosed and that worked out great for us.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1276 on: January 05, 2012, 02:05:00 pm »
Morse was finally loosed and that worked out great for us.

Do we have another morse waiting to push through (and don't pretend he came from nowhere- people were calling for him to start before ST last year)?

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1277 on: January 05, 2012, 02:05:16 pm »
Morse was finally loosed and that worked out great for us.

:lmao:







:?

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1278 on: January 05, 2012, 02:08:14 pm »
and don't pretend he came from nowhere- people were calling for him to start before ST last year

Uh, yeah, I was calling for him to start by early-mid 2010.  Free Michael Morse! 

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2936
  • Too Stressed to care.
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1279 on: January 05, 2012, 02:15:18 pm »
From the latest on Buster Olney:
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/blog/_/name/olney_buster/id/7427173/prince-fielder-make-nationals-immediate-playoff-contenders-there-risks-mlb

Quote from: an NL evaluator
If the Nationals sign Prince Fielder, there is no question they become a better team and an immediate threat in the NL East. Compare them to the class of the division in Philadelphia: an infield of Fielder, Espinosa, Desmond and Zimmerman right now is equal to Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, Jimmy Rollins and Placido Polanco; the oldest player in the Nationals' projected infield is Fielder at age 27 whereas the youngest player in the Phillies' infield is 33.



Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1280 on: January 05, 2012, 02:17:04 pm »
And Howard isn't playing anytime soon

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1281 on: January 05, 2012, 02:19:04 pm »
an infield of Fielder, Espinosa, Desmond and Zimmerman right now is equal to Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, Jimmy Rollins and Placido Polanco;

I don't see it. We match up at the corners but not middle.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1282 on: January 05, 2012, 02:20:09 pm »
I don't see it. We match up at the corners but not middle.

We're better at the corners.

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1283 on: January 05, 2012, 02:21:29 pm »
I don't see it. We match up at the corners but not middle.


The difference between Zimmerman and Polanco, and Fielder and Howard would mkae up for the differences between Rollins and Desmond, and Utley and Espinosa.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1284 on: January 05, 2012, 02:25:29 pm »
Depends on how much Utley can play and how quickly Rollins and Utley get old.

edit:  Assuming no change in performance from Desmond/Espinosa.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1285 on: January 05, 2012, 02:28:00 pm »
Depends on how much Utley can play and how quickly Rollins and Utley get old.

edit:  Assuming no change in performance from Desmond/Espinosa.

I would say how long Howard takes to get back is a huge factor

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1286 on: January 05, 2012, 02:37:10 pm »
Rizzo once again flat out DENIES any interest in Fielder. Like I have said countless times, the Nats are not even in discussion for him. He's not Rizzo's type of player.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/5/nationals-gm-rizzo-nothing-changed-prince-fielder/

Quote
According to general manager Mike Rizzo, if the Nationals are the favorites to land Fielder now, it’s not because of any renewed push for the All-Star.

Our position has not changed since the winter meetings, on Prince Fielder specifically,” Rizzo told The Washington Times on Thursday. “We feel we have a good first baseman in Adam LaRoche. We feel he’s 100 percent healthy and when he’s 100 percent we’re going to get the 25 home runs, 85-100 RBI and great defense at first base. We’re committed to him. We also have a backup plan at first base with Mike Morse.

“We feel that we’re settled at that position. But when I get asked the question: Does Prince Fielder help the club? Of course he helps the club. He’ll help any other club he’s with also. … Nothing has changed since we discussed this stuff in the winter meetings. There are a lot of comments that we’re the front runners and I don’t know where that comes from because we haven’t gone beyond where we were at since the winter meetings.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1287 on: January 05, 2012, 02:38:52 pm »
ASSCLOWN in two weeks:

"Rizzo should be THROWN IN JAIL IMMEDIATELY for lying to the media like that."

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31839
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1288 on: January 05, 2012, 02:40:13 pm »
Rizzo also said our starting rotation was all set.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1289 on: January 05, 2012, 02:40:42 pm »
Rizzo also annoyed with always being linked to Boras clients:

Quote
“It’s the free agent frenzy, I guess, at this time of year when a major free agent hasn’t signed,” Rizzo said. “(Everyone) will try and figure out where he fits best and our name is bandied about, especially when it’s a Boras client, all the time.”

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1290 on: January 05, 2012, 02:41:33 pm »
Annoyed?

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1291 on: January 05, 2012, 02:43:13 pm »
Must be in his inflection. :lol:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1292 on: January 05, 2012, 02:47:21 pm »
Where are all the phonies and liars at now? This crap was just like the Teixeria garbage a few years ago with those jerks from Maine. Nothing but lies and bullcrap once again. The Nats are not even in the running for Prince.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1293 on: January 05, 2012, 02:48:00 pm »
rizzo who cares if you have LaRoche, this is an opportunity to field a good team.  Get Fielder.  No excuses. 

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1294 on: January 05, 2012, 02:48:59 pm »
Where are all the phonies and liars at now? This crap was just like the Teixeria garbage a few years ago with those jerks from Maine. Nothing but lies and bullcrap once again. The Nats are not even in the running for Prince.

And yet you can't move on from the subject. 

You're the world's easiest person to dupe.  :lmao:

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1295 on: January 05, 2012, 02:50:40 pm »
Nothing like settling for less Rizzo.

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1296 on: January 05, 2012, 02:52:35 pm »
The 3rd denial is always the most important.

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1297 on: January 05, 2012, 02:53:21 pm »
I mean hey, if Rizzo is doing this to keep the price down, then genius move, but if he's actually serious, SMFH.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31839
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1298 on: January 05, 2012, 02:53:41 pm »
Something needs to happen, I don't care what.  I'm sick of this waiting.

Yes I know, the 18th.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66842
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1299 on: January 05, 2012, 02:54:11 pm »
What about the 18th?