Author Topic: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1  (Read 46677 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #150 on: September 17, 2010, 09:13:31 pm »
Yet potomac you continue to act like kasten and say you think this team is close to competing.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47225
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #151 on: September 17, 2010, 09:13:32 pm »
these are the kinds of games that Dibble made watchable.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #152 on: September 17, 2010, 09:14:50 pm »
Showalter had a point about the September call-ups making managing too easy, he proposed that teams should have to pick 25 players to dress a night, that might make things more interesting.

That's a really good idea.  It's like the NFL's active/inactive designation except this one makes sense.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #153 on: September 17, 2010, 09:15:00 pm »
Kennedy went 4-5 during Oswalt's first start for the Phills back in July - I think it was Kilgore that tweeted "Kennedy kills Oswalt"

I remember the original ... :)

Online imref

  • Posts: 47225
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #154 on: September 17, 2010, 09:17:24 pm »
That's a really good idea.  It's like the NFL's active/inactive designation except this one makes sense.

yeah, showalter was laughing at how some teams were scanning the waiver wire just to get an extra pinch runner.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47225
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #155 on: September 17, 2010, 09:19:52 pm »
top of the ninth at Potomac, P-Nats still up 2-1

Online imref

  • Posts: 47225
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #156 on: September 17, 2010, 09:21:00 pm »
for all the negatives about this team, at least we get to see Zimmerman play almost every night.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47225
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #157 on: September 17, 2010, 09:22:35 pm »
NATS WIN THE CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!

(Potomac!)

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #158 on: September 17, 2010, 09:23:17 pm »
NATS WIN THE CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!

(Potomac!)

Yes sir !!!

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #159 on: September 17, 2010, 09:23:37 pm »
Dunn, the rally killer.

Offline Spinman

  • Posts: 2158
  • Grandpa Spinman
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #160 on: September 17, 2010, 09:24:43 pm »

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #161 on: September 17, 2010, 09:27:33 pm »
Ray kneeling before the Lerners.   :spaz:

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #162 on: September 17, 2010, 09:29:09 pm »
Dunn's great defense is not enough to save the rest of the bums from themselves.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47225
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #163 on: September 17, 2010, 09:31:56 pm »
Ray kneeling before the Lerners.   :spaz:

a few weeks ago he was praising the lerners for signing our high draft picks.  sigh...

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3582
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #164 on: September 17, 2010, 09:32:25 pm »
for all the negatives about this team, at least we get to see Zimmerman play almost every night.
It's like '07-'09 all over again!

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #165 on: September 17, 2010, 09:32:40 pm »
Dunn's great defense is not enough to save the rest of the bums from themselves.
:funny:
  :thumbs:

Online imref

  • Posts: 47225
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #166 on: September 17, 2010, 09:34:35 pm »
i'm guessing we'll see Bally shortly.

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3582
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #167 on: September 17, 2010, 09:44:10 pm »
Can't wait to never hear Wil Nieves's batting music again.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #168 on: September 17, 2010, 09:51:41 pm »
Can't wait to never hear Wil Nieves's batting music again.

HEY!  There's nothing wrong with the music.  Give it to Espinosa and have Wil move along.

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3582
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #169 on: September 17, 2010, 09:54:24 pm »
HEY!  There's nothing wrong with the music.  Give it to Espinosa and have Wil move along.
Fair enough.

Nats lost by the way for those of you who were wondering.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47225
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #170 on: September 17, 2010, 09:54:52 pm »
let us never speak of this game again.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #171 on: September 17, 2010, 09:55:50 pm »
let us never speak of this game again.

What game?

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #172 on: September 17, 2010, 10:00:31 pm »
The wit and wisdom of Phil Wood - "Its not that Marquis pitched all that bad, he just couldn't get anyone out."

Offline bglide

  • banned
  • Posts: 452
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #173 on: September 17, 2010, 10:51:17 pm »
Marquis is trash.  DFA that bum, Willie Harris, Kevin Mench, Will Nieves, Alberto Gonzalez, and Justin Maxwell. No reason any of these guys should be on a big league club.  Why are they here?  They don't help us win, and they are all old.  Play the young kids. 

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3582
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #174 on: September 17, 2010, 11:07:15 pm »
Marquis is trash.  DFA that bum, Willie Harris, Kevin Mench, Will Nieves, Alberto Gonzalez, and Justin Maxwell. No reason any of these guys should be on a big league club.  Why are they here?  They don't help us win, and they are all old.  Play the young kids. 
Maxwell isn't old... he's not a big leaguer IMO, but he's not old.