Author Topic: Nationals @ Astros, Game 1 (Read 10446 times)

DPMOmaha · « **Reply #225:** May 31, 2010, 05:03:05 PM »

Pence looks weird when he's warming up.

ronnynat · « **Reply #226:** May 31, 2010, 05:04:15 PM »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on May 31, 2010, 04:51:01 PM

Could you imagine DeJesus in RF for this team? The offense would be deadly.

Hart probably wouldn't cost us too much. 13 homers, .901 OPS this season.

DPMOmaha · « **Reply #227:** May 31, 2010, 05:06:39 PM »

Quote from: ronnynat on May 31, 2010, 05:04:15 PM

Hart probably wouldn't cost us too much. 13 homers, .901 OPS this season.

I'd still rather have DeJesus.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #228:** May 31, 2010, 05:06:43 PM »

they have more fans on field than runs scored.

Potomac Cannons · « **Reply #229:** May 31, 2010, 05:06:51 PM »

Quote from: Smithian on May 31, 2010, 04:47:36 PM

He had a 12 run lead going into the 7th with an overworked bullpen and he still had to be pulled.

If Adam Kennedy makes a freaking routine defensive play he gets through 7 and he still shouldn't have been pulled.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #230:** May 31, 2010, 05:07:21 PM »

c'mon LUKE TYWALKER

ronnynat · « **Reply #231:** May 31, 2010, 05:08:01 PM »

Quote from: DPMOmaha on May 31, 2010, 05:06:39 PM

I'd still rather have DeJesus.

Me too, but I think we'd have to give up too much to get him.

RL04 · « **Reply #232:** May 31, 2010, 05:08:26 PM »

Quote from: hammondsnats on May 31, 2010, 05:06:43 PM

they have more fans on field than runs scored.

Post of the day!

DPMOmaha · « **Reply #233:** May 31, 2010, 05:09:05 PM »

Quote from: ronnynat on May 31, 2010, 05:08:01 PM

Me too, but I think we'd have to give up too much to get him.

Maybe, but I don't think we'd have to give up that much. He's in the last year of his contract with an option for next year.

ronnynat · « **Reply #234:** May 31, 2010, 05:10:39 PM »

Quote from: DPMOmaha on May 31, 2010, 05:09:05 PM

Maybe, but I don't think we'd have to give up that much.

Does the club option come with the player or does it get canceled when they're traded?

hammondsnats · « **Reply #235:** May 31, 2010, 05:10:57 PM »

mackys has no idea what's about to hit them ... i'm gonna order a beer/shot for each nats run scored today

DPMOmaha · « **Reply #236:** May 31, 2010, 05:11:16 PM »

Quote from: ronnynat on May 31, 2010, 05:10:39 PM

Does the club option come with the player or does it get canceled when they're traded.

not sure.

natsfan4evr · « **Reply #237:** May 31, 2010, 05:12:03 PM »

Quote from: ronnynat on May 31, 2010, 05:10:39 PM

Does the club option come with the player or does it get canceled when they're traded?

I'm pretty sure it's built into the player, and not the team.

Potomac Cannons · « **Reply #238:** May 31, 2010, 05:12:42 PM »

Quote from: ronnynat on May 31, 2010, 05:04:15 PM

Hart probably wouldn't cost us too much. 13 homers, .901 OPS this season.

I'd take DeJesus as well, but Hart is an okay defender and his OPS is high while his BABIP is way below his usual.

Potomac Cannons · « **Reply #239:** May 31, 2010, 05:16:03 PM »

Quote from: DPMOmaha on May 31, 2010, 05:09:05 PM

Maybe, but I don't think we'd have to give up that much. He's in the last year of his contract with an option for next year.

KC is solid in their OF prospects, they like Ankiel for some unknown reason, and they're trying to move him so it may not cost as much as usual. I suspect they want Gordon in LF the second half of '10, Kila at DH and some way to fit Moustakas in the lineup at 3B by next spring at the latest, so DeJesus and Guillen may both be available for bullpen help or something to that effect.

Potomac Cannons · « **Reply #240:** May 31, 2010, 05:18:00 PM »

Quote from: natsfan4evr on May 31, 2010, 05:12:03 PM

I'm pretty sure it's built into the player, and not the team.

Yep. The option is only 6m and the buyout is only 500k, so that's not really a problem.

natsfan4evr · « **Reply #241:** May 31, 2010, 05:22:26 PM »

Did anyone seriously think this team would be at .500 after May?
The schedule is so easy for June...I hate getting my hopes up, but it's hard not to be excited about the prospects of a very good June.

nats2playoffs · « **Reply #242:** May 31, 2010, 05:23:18 PM »

...BANG!!!! .....ZOOM!!!!!!

NATIONALS WIN A LAUGHER!!!

POST A CURLY W NOW!!!!

ronnynat · « **Reply #243:** May 31, 2010, 05:23:46 PM »

Great job today, Nats!!

ronnynat · « **Reply #244:** May 31, 2010, 05:25:10 PM »

Atilano is 5-1. That's bananas.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #245:** May 31, 2010, 05:26:09 PM »

Quote from: natsfan4evr on May 31, 2010, 05:22:26 PM

Did anyone seriously think this team would be at .500 after May?
The schedule is so easy for June...I hate getting my hopes up, but it's hard not to be excited about the prospects of a very good June.

Exactly. Lets make a June run like the Braves did with their easy May schedule. Maybe we can get a taste of first once whats his name gets up here. (as well as the other pitchers)

UMDNats · « **Reply #246:** May 31, 2010, 05:26:10 PM »

RL04 · « **Reply #247:** May 31, 2010, 05:30:07 PM »

That was fun!

By the way, is the video/sound breaking up on TV at times for anyone else?

Galah · « **Reply #248:** May 31, 2010, 05:33:23 PM »

Quote from: RL04 on May 31, 2010, 05:30:07 PM

That was fun!

By the way, is the video/sound breaking up on TV at times for anyone else?

Yep, broke up once or twice for me too.

Can I just say...the patriotic, white, curly dubya hats with the grey away uniforms look pretty darn stupid

nats2playoffs · « **Reply #249:** May 31, 2010, 05:56:42 PM »

THIS GAME WILL BE REPEATED ON MASN AT ABOUT 8:30 PM TONIGHT
AND AT 9:AM TOMORROW (TUESDAY)