Author Topic: Nationals vs Dodgers, Game 3 (Read 20929 times)

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #50 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:16:56 pm »

Nice 7 pitch inning there.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #51 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:17:21 pm »

Dave just said Dodgers 1, Nationals nothing

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #52 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:22:00 pm »

Nyjer is a great leadoff hitter. I love how he works the count.

As long as he plays like Nyjer and less like T-Plush, he's a great, great player.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #53 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:23:30 pm »

Damn. Good pitch to run on as well.

NatsDad14 · « **Reply #54 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:26:29 pm »

I assume he got a bad jump because it was the perfect pitch and throw wasn't all that great.

Potomac Cannons · « **Reply #55 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:28:06 pm »

Nyjer just doesn't seem comfortable on the feet first slide just yet.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #56 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:28:29 pm »

Blake is on fiah lately.

metssuck · « **Reply #57 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:31:47 pm »

Looking at Anderson profile on espn, sadly it screams steroids use

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #58 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:32:03 pm »

5 K's through 4.

NatsDad14 · « **Reply #59 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:32:54 pm »

Since when did Olsen start getting a lot of swinging strikes.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #60 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:33:18 pm »

Quote from: metssuck on April 25, 2010, 02:31:47 pm

Looking at Anderson profile on espn, sadly it screams steroids use

Really? Looks like he had a pretty realistic career arch to me.

Age - OPS
21 - .770
22 - .857
23 - .719
24 - .743
25 - .780
26 - .805
27 - .826
28 - .792
29 - .871
30 - .886
31 - .789
32 - .743
33 - .756
34 - .826
35 - .758
36 - .704
37 - .496

metssuck · « **Reply #61 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:37:33 pm »

that hr and rbi slope dont look realistic

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #62 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:39:21 pm »

Quote from: metssuck on April 25, 2010, 02:37:33 pm

that hr and rbi slope dont look realistic

I'll give you the home runs part... but, RBI's are mainly a product of the runners in front of you getting on base... not an indication that you are on PED's.

NatsDad14 · « **Reply #63 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:40:28 pm »

If Belliard ate 3 less burgers, he would have had that ball.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #64 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:41:46 pm »

Good pitching matchup so far.

EdStroud · « **Reply #65 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:42:04 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on April 25, 2010, 02:39:21 pm

I'll give you the home runs part... but, RBI's are mainly a product of the runners in front of you getting on base... not an indication that you are on PED's.

'02 Angels had numerous maybes for juicing(a lot of teams did);

Salmon, Erstad, Fullmer, Glaus, Spiezio and Anderson.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #66 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:43:21 pm »

I'm not saying that Anderson wasn't on the juice, I just haven't ever heard his named mentioned as part of it.

EdStroud · « **Reply #67 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:44:12 pm »

Martis and Zmnn

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #68 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:44:44 pm »

What about Stammen?

metssuck · « **Reply #69 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:44:51 pm »

55 pitch thrown and 43 of them are strikes. good game by Olsen..................

so far

Potomac Cannons · « **Reply #70 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:44:56 pm »

Quote from: metssuck on April 25, 2010, 02:31:47 pm

Looking at Anderson profile on espn, sadly it screams steroids use

Looks like he bounces back and forth between mid .700s and mid .800s in OPS with no real pattern to it. Not sure how PEDs would cause a very normal career fluctuation (except maybe for the longevity of it).

imref · « **Reply #71 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:46:27 pm »

Olsen's era down to 7.5, so far very good

Potomac Cannons · « **Reply #72 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:46:54 pm »

Quote from: metssuck on April 25, 2010, 02:37:33 pm

that hr and rbi slope dont look realistic

He had steady improvement until he hit his peak at 27-31 where he had a single 30+ HR season and 4 20+ HR seasons. Absolutely nothing unusual in there at all.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #73 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:46:57 pm »

Don't get too fine here, Scott.

imref · « **Reply #74 on:** April 25, 2010, 02:47:33 pm »

First walk? 47 strikes, 17 balls is fantastic, stay aggressive scott!