Author Topic: Spring Training Game Threads (2010)  (Read 56396 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: 3/19 vs. Cardinals (Attack of the Burg III)
« Reply #1150 on: March 20, 2010, 01:23:02 am »
Good to see Bruney settle the past week or so.  Now, if Capps and Burnett would too, we might have something there.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: 3/19 vs. Cardinals (Attack of the Burg III)
« Reply #1151 on: March 20, 2010, 01:38:43 am »
Good to see Bruney settle the past week or so.  Now, if Capps and Burnett would too, we might have something there.

Definitely. Bruney seems to be on the right track, and I think Clippard was OK as well. If we can get Capps and Burnett up to speed, our bullpen could be decent.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47394
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: 3/19 vs. Cardinals (Attack of the Burg III)
« Reply #1152 on: March 20, 2010, 08:48:43 am »
No.

Actually "yes", Stras is going to Harrisburg.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: 3/19 vs. Cardinals (Attack of the Burg III)
« Reply #1153 on: March 20, 2010, 09:16:31 am »
Actually "yes", Stras is going to Harrisburg.

Confirmed? May be roadtrip time . . .

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45539
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: 3/19 vs. Cardinals (Attack of the Burg III)
« Reply #1154 on: March 20, 2010, 09:43:31 am »
His total Spring Training output:

Strasburg's total pitching line for the spring: 9 ip, 8 h, 2 er, 1 bb, 12 k. 149 pitches, 97 strikes, 14 groundouts-1 Flyout (popup).

His outfielders must be incredibly bored.  You actually could play Dunn in center and it would not matter.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7969
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: 3/19 vs. Cardinals (Attack of the Burg III)
« Reply #1155 on: March 20, 2010, 09:49:08 am »
Actually "yes", Stras is going to Harrisburg.

Looks like you responded to the wrong post. But I think the end result is the same. The question was if he got another start, does that mean he is coming north with the big club, and the answer was no. Whether or not he got another start in major or minor league camp really didn't matter anyway. He was going to start the season in the minors.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47394
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: 3/19 vs. Cardinals (Attack of the Burg III)
« Reply #1156 on: March 20, 2010, 10:02:29 am »
His outfielders must be incredibly bored.  You actually could play Dunn in center and it would not matter.

zuckerman tweeted that yesterday.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47394
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: 3/19 vs. Cardinals (Attack of the Burg III)
« Reply #1157 on: March 20, 2010, 10:03:48 am »
Looks like you responded to the wrong post. But I think the end result is the same. The question was if he got another start, does that mean he is coming north with the big club, and the answer was no. Whether or not he got another start in major or minor league camp really didn't matter anyway. He was going to start the season in the minors.

true, my thought was that after last night's start they would want to get the rotation ready, so there's really nothing more to gain by having him make another start if he's not going to make the club.  That's why they made a decision this morning.  From here on out it's time to focus on the guys who actually will be on the 25-man.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: 3/19 vs. Cardinals (Attack of the Burg III)
« Reply #1158 on: March 20, 2010, 10:07:46 am »
His outfielders must be incredibly bored.  You actually could play Dunn in center and it would not matter.

With a 97-100mph heater, when a pro hitter gets good contact, no way that it stays in play. He's a 3 outcome pitcher: K, groundout, HR.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7969
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: 3/19 vs. Cardinals (Attack of the Burg III)
« Reply #1159 on: March 20, 2010, 10:23:28 am »
true, my thought was that after last night's start they would want to get the rotation ready, so there's really nothing more to gain by having him make another start if he's not going to make the club.  That's why they made a decision this morning.  From here on out it's time to focus on the guys who actually will be on the 25-man.


Right. They need to get the others as much work as possible. There was a chance that they would still schedule a start against big-league pitching if they had a guys ready who can finish against other competition, but that's really not necessary. McCatty's concern that he may not be challenged in the minors seems unnecessary. He will be challenged and given ample opportunity to work on things regardless of where he plays. Even if he has games where he isn't hit hard, the other players in the field will mess up at times and he'll have to deal with baserunners and working from the stretch. Most important is for him to get acclimated to the faster game, the routine, the fielding and hitting side of things. He can do that anywhere. And the minor league games will be more competitive than some of the ST games he's dealt with.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1160 on: March 20, 2010, 01:42:22 pm »
2-1 after 1 1/2

Tweet from Ben -

Quote
masnBen -

Guzman finally gets a ball hit to his right deep in the hole, sidearms a weak throw that pulls Dunn off first base. E6


Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1161 on: March 20, 2010, 01:42:54 pm »
Who's starting for the Nats?

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1162 on: March 20, 2010, 01:44:38 pm »
Who's starting for the Nats?

Bernadina, CF     
Guzman, C, SS
Zimmerman, R, 3B
Dunn, A, 1B
Willingham, LF    
Morse, RF
Gonzalez, Al, 2B
Nieves, C
Mock, P

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1163 on: March 20, 2010, 01:50:01 pm »
First inning is Bernadina BB, Guz K, Zim RBI. 

That gives the 8 million dollar pariah a K and an E in 1.5 innings.  He can't field, can't hit 2nd in the lineup, and is in the way of a guy with talent.  Make him go away.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7787
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1164 on: March 20, 2010, 01:51:06 pm »
Morse failed to capitalize on a crucial opportunity in the first with the bases loaded and one out.  He GIDP :doh:

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1165 on: March 20, 2010, 01:51:19 pm »
Thanks cmd.  If Mock continues to be mediocre and Stammen outperforms him, I'm going to be slightly peeved if they bump Stammen in favor of Mock.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1166 on: March 20, 2010, 01:52:12 pm »
Thanks.  If Mock continues to be mediocre and Stammen outperforms him, I'm going to be slightly peeved if they bump Stammen in favor of Mock.

I think they'll be 4-5 with Martin the long reliever to start.  Any combination of the three wouldn't bother me at this point.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1167 on: March 20, 2010, 01:53:43 pm »
Thanks cmd.  If Mock continues to be mediocre and Stammen outperforms him, I'm going to be slightly peeved if they bump Stammen in favor of Mock.

That's the bonus baby mentality. Higher round prospects getting preference, even though Mock was acquired through trade.

Are people really complaining about Morse hitting into a GIDP one time? He's been killing the ball.

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1168 on: March 20, 2010, 01:55:25 pm »
First inning is Bernadina BB, Guz K, Zim RBI. 

That gives the 8 million dollar pariah a K and an E in 1.5 innings.  He can't field, can't hit 2nd in the lineup, and is in the way of a guy with talent.  Make him go away.
And now caught going to second.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7787
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1169 on: March 20, 2010, 01:55:39 pm »
That's the bonus baby mentality. Higher round prospects getting preference, even though Mock was acquired through trade.

Are people really complaining about Morse hitting into a GIDP one time? He's been killing the ball.

Sorry, just trying to provide info, didn't know I was complaining.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1170 on: March 20, 2010, 01:56:32 pm »
That's the bonus baby mentality. Higher round prospects getting preference, even though Mock was acquired through trade.

Are people really complaining about Morse hitting into a GIDP one time? He's been killing the ball.

GIDP's suck no matter what player.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7787
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1171 on: March 20, 2010, 01:59:33 pm »
Zimm gets another hit (2 for 2 today), but gets caught stealing 2nd.  Nats down 1-2 heading into the 3rd.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1172 on: March 20, 2010, 01:59:47 pm »
That's the bonus baby mentality. Higher round prospects getting preference, even though Mock was acquired through trade.
Eh, I doubt that factors in too much.  I think Mock has this mythical, hyped-up fastball that really isn't as great as everyone (read: scouts/management within this org.) thinks.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1173 on: March 20, 2010, 02:00:28 pm »
That's the bonus baby mentality. Higher round prospects getting preference, even though Mock was acquired through trade.

Are people really complaining about Morse hitting into a GIDP one time? He's been killing the ball.

Mock had a BB and HR and nothing else negative so far today.

Morse came into today at .250/.300/.500 and promptly GIDP.  Not exactly killing the ball but he's done enough that I think he deserves a shot at RF.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7787
Re: 3/20 vs Marlins
« Reply #1174 on: March 20, 2010, 02:06:21 pm »
Willingham drops a fly ball to Left, but the ump says Hammer held the ball long enough.  Lucky break.

Mock gets a strikeout to wiggle out of a jam.