Author Topic: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)  (Read 32737 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #775 on: March 26, 2010, 05:01:38 pm »
oh man. they didn't cut Gilbert's head off, put it on a pike, and parade it around town as an example.

sportsfan and PA aren't going to be happy about this.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #776 on: March 26, 2010, 11:31:32 pm »

sportsfan and PA aren't going to be happy about this.

If  he wins and/or kicks Blatche in the nuts, I'm on board.

Offline OldChelsea

  • Posts: 8160
  • Nats Supporter in Exile
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #777 on: March 27, 2010, 08:22:35 am »
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/crime-scene/from-the-courthouse/washington-wizards-star-guard.html?hpid=topnews

looks like the Wizards will be stuck with their max contract albatross

When Reggie Lewis died, the Celtics weren't able to get his contract voided - the Wizards' I'm afraid, are stuck with this Jagr-sized millstone-round-the-neck too.

...meanwhile back on the hardwood, the new franchise record for consecutive losses was set with last night's loss at Charlotte...now 14 in a row...I'll be there tonight for number 15 when the Utah Jazz check into the Phone Booth.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #778 on: March 28, 2010, 05:46:40 pm »
I stumbled across this article from 2007:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/01/AR2007110102711.html

Quote
If I ran the Lakers and I was going to accommodate Kobe and trade him, there's only one player who would be on my radar, a player who could sell a ticket or two in Los Angeles, a player who can score nearly as much as Kobe, who's younger than Kobe, who might get along with the existing Lakers better than Kobe does.

And that, boys and girls, would be Gilbert Arenas.

lol

Offline CatsEye

  • Posts: 1655
  • Very weird season -Creepy - What....
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #779 on: March 29, 2010, 04:54:43 pm »
oh man. they didn't cut Gilbert's head off, put it on a pike, and parade it around town as an example.

               :rant:  This sucks Big-Time. I am sooo annoyed. I told my sales executive -H@ll No, I'm not going to renew my ST for next year with the Wizards -not with that "Clown" on the team.
   :rant:  What a f-ing disappointment. D.C. - you don't uphold your laws - how can anyone take the laws in D.C. seriously.  :rant:  This sucks -big time...... :razz: That is all..... :evil: :devil:
 

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #780 on: March 29, 2010, 10:28:30 pm »
The Nets beat the Spurs (SPURS!!!) for their 10th win, to avoid infamy.  Luckily, their 10th win won't be against Wizards! :clap:

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21925
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #781 on: March 29, 2010, 11:09:25 pm »
The Nets beat the Spurs (SPURS!!!) for their 10th win, to avoid infamy.  Luckily, their 10th win won't be against Wizards! :clap:

Thank god since right now, I think the nets are the better team. At least if we loose to them, it won't go down in infamy

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #782 on: March 29, 2010, 11:35:23 pm »
Let CatsEye carry the torch. I'm over it.

Offline CatsEye

  • Posts: 1655
  • Very weird season -Creepy - What....
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #783 on: April 01, 2010, 04:49:42 pm »
Let CatsEye carry the torch. I'm over it.
              What torch? You're over what? The Wizards or Gilbert Arenas? Someday, I swear, I will learn the basic code to your remarks, maybe a de-coder ring would help....  :icon_mrgreen:

   

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #784 on: April 06, 2010, 08:55:46 pm »
McGee whooping again. I like Flip, but he doesn't give McGee enough minutes.

Livingston will probably be brought back next season. He's a good one.

Wiz up 94-77 at the end of the 3rd.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #785 on: April 06, 2010, 08:57:26 pm »
McGee whooping again. I like Flip, but he doesn't give McGee enough minutes.

Livingston will probably be brought back next season. He's a good one.

Wiz up 94-77 at the end of the 3rd.

Only 8 players suited up for the opposition.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47392
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #786 on: April 15, 2010, 08:58:37 pm »
Eddie Jordan fired from the 76rs, maybe he'll get the Clippers job next to complete his tour of worst NBA franchises.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #787 on: June 24, 2010, 04:47:41 pm »
No new thread so I'll post this here.  Looks like Hinrich and the 17th pick to the Wiz.  That gives them Wall, Gilbert, Hinrich, Young in the back court.  Also gives them 17th pick for a post/wing player and 30th for whatever they don't get at 17.  Not bad, and you can already see the work of the Great Ted influencing how they go about things.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2010/news/story?id=5324240

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21925
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #788 on: June 24, 2010, 04:50:36 pm »
Yippy, not only have we pretty much officially bowed out of the best free agent class of all time, we've helped a team in our own confence get two max players. I wonder if we just built a dynasty for Chicago?

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #789 on: June 24, 2010, 05:06:44 pm »
Yippy, not only have we pretty much officially bowed out of the best free agent class of all time, we've helped a team in our own confence get two max players. I wonder if we just built a dynasty for Chicago?

I doubt it matters much for Chicago.  Rose/Lebron won't be able to play together.  If they add Bosh/Johnson, then that team is stacked, but they will be anyways.  This improves the Wizards back court drastically over last year, adds the best player in the draft, keeps them from wasting time on a FA class they had no real chance in, and allows for one more very good player in a fairly deep draft.  Then they can go the FA route and offer a mid level exemption to one of the big names if things get a little wacky or just go add a solid player like Rudy Gay to keep building things up.

Let's say it plays out that they take Wall.  The 17th pick could easily be a legit PF like Craig Brackins or Larry Sanders and it wouldn't surprise me if a legit C like Cole Aldrich slides.  That gives you the 30th pick with something like Jordan Crawford, Stanley Robinson etc. on the wing or another post player as this is considered a draft with a lot of good, but not great, bigs.  There's still the 35th pick.  Then there's FA where I really want to see the return of Haywood along with Rudy Gay.

Roster could look like this:
Starters--
1  John Wall
2  Gilbert Arenas
3  Rudy Gay
4  Andray Blatche
5  Brendan Haywood

Bench--
Kirk Hinrich
Nick Young
Al Thornton
Javale McGee
Pick 17 
Pick 30 
Pick 35 

That's a huge improvement over just 2 months ago.

Oh, and that Melo guy is a FA next year.  That's one we get a real chance at.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #790 on: June 24, 2010, 06:22:08 pm »
That would be a really good back court but I'd like to see us make a bigger splash in the FA. If not then that seems like a reasonable starting 5 with some young guys still improving.

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #791 on: June 24, 2010, 07:37:17 pm »
I doubt it matters much for Chicago.  Rose/Lebron won't be able to play together.  If they add Bosh/Johnson, then that team is stacked, but they will be anyways.  This improves the Wizards back court drastically over last year, adds the best player in the draft, keeps them from wasting time on a FA class they had no real chance in, and allows for one more very good player in a fairly deep draft.  Then they can go the FA route and offer a mid level exemption to one of the big names if things get a little wacky or just go add a solid player like Rudy Gay to keep building things up.

Let's say it plays out that they take Wall.  The 17th pick could easily be a legit PF like Craig Brackins or Larry Sanders and it wouldn't surprise me if a legit C like Cole Aldrich slides.  That gives you the 30th pick with something like Jordan Crawford, Stanley Robinson etc. on the wing or another post player as this is considered a draft with a lot of good, but not great, bigs.  There's still the 35th pick.  Then there's FA where I really want to see the return of Haywood along with Rudy Gay.

Roster could look like this:
Starters--
1  John Wall
2  Gilbert Arenas
3  Rudy Gay
4  Andray Blatche
5  Brendan Haywood

Bench--
Kirk Hinrich
Nick Young
Al Thornton
Javale McGee
Pick 17 
Pick 30 
Pick 35 

That's a huge improvement over just 2 months ago.

Oh, and that Melo guy is a FA next year.  That's one we get a real chance at.

That's not a great plan. It's great if the team wants to be a #7/8 seed every year. The team needs to avoid blowing cap space on mediocre veterans (Gay, Boozer). Plus, if the team signs Rudy Gay, they don't have enough cap space to sign Melo.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #792 on: June 24, 2010, 07:45:39 pm »
That's not a great plan. It's great if the team wants to be a #7/8 seed every year. The team needs to avoid blowing cap space on mediocre veterans (Gay, Boozer). Plus, if the team signs Rudy Gay, they don't have enough cap space to sign Melo.

Gay turns 24 in August and he's a solid offensive AND defensive player. Boozer's way above average, too, but he's fragile.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #793 on: June 24, 2010, 07:45:52 pm »
Will the Wizards pick at #17 or will they tell Chicago who to pick for them?

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #794 on: June 24, 2010, 07:48:37 pm »
Hinrich is an expiring contract.  That's nearly 11m that comes off the books after next year.  That, along with guys like Young/Thornton probably gone at that time as well, and there will be plenty of room for Melo.


Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #795 on: June 24, 2010, 07:53:55 pm »
Gay turns 24 in August and he's a solid offensive AND defensive player. Boozer's way above average, too, but he's fragile.

I wouldn't mind Boozer, if Blatche can play C most of the time, as Carlos was 8th in the league in player efficiency last year.

Rudy Gay was 53rd, is still improving, and should be cheaper than someone like Boozer by far.

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #796 on: June 24, 2010, 07:59:40 pm »
Hinrich is an expiring contract.  That's nearly 11m that comes off the books after next year.  That, along with guys like Young/Thornton probably gone at that time as well, and there will be plenty of room for Melo.


Hinrih has 2 years left on his deal for a total of 18 Million. That is why I don't like the deal. It makes sense if he was an expiring

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #797 on: June 24, 2010, 09:28:47 pm »
The Spurs know how to draft. James Anderson is going to be awesome. Future All-Star.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #798 on: June 24, 2010, 09:30:53 pm »
Wall is going to be a total bust.  Can't shoot, turnover prone, reminds me a lot of Rodney Stuckey

Eh, we'll let time decide. I believe he'll be a contributor at least.

If I could choose who we could get in the free agency (aside from Wade/Lebron, etc) I'd choose Boozer/Bosh. Having one of them down low with two good guys up top could create some confused D. Let Blatche and McGee take center, or sign someone cheap.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Wizards Thread (2009-2010)
« Reply #799 on: June 24, 2010, 09:32:13 pm »
              What torch? You're over what? The Wizards or Gilbert Arenas? Someday, I swear, I will learn the basic code to your remarks, maybe a de-coder ring would help....  :icon_mrgreen:

   

Reply a long time coming. I don't give up on the home team, but i give up on anti-Arenas tirades because he's staying.