Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3  (Read 49621 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #650 on: May 27, 2009, 10:22:07 pm »
grand slam please wright.  i have you on my fantasy team and joel hanrahan is garbage.  no pressure situation and he still blows. 

This is why I hate fantasy sports. Even at this point I wouldn't want him to get a GS.

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #651 on: May 27, 2009, 10:23:42 pm »
Look on the bright side, at least no Mets fan needs to beat his mom to death since the Mets are about to sweep us.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #652 on: May 27, 2009, 10:24:49 pm »
you can say that again.

Hanrahan makes it interesting but wiggles out.

 :icon_mrgreen:

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #653 on: May 27, 2009, 10:24:54 pm »
This is why I hate fantasy sports. Even at this point I wouldn't want him to get a GS.

i was half kidding.  good to see hanrahan pull out of that, but still, too close for comfort.  even if it's a 4 run game.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #654 on: May 27, 2009, 10:25:12 pm »
nieves being nieves

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #655 on: May 27, 2009, 10:25:16 pm »
Tonight will make it more than 80 straight games we have lost when trailing entering the 9th.  That's amazing.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #656 on: May 27, 2009, 10:25:24 pm »

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #657 on: May 27, 2009, 10:25:30 pm »
4-19 without Flores behind the plate. Dagger.

9-14 with him.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #658 on: May 27, 2009, 10:25:31 pm »
:rofl: at the replay of Zambrano "ejecting" the umpire.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #659 on: May 27, 2009, 10:26:08 pm »
OMG I would throw a party Thursday night if Manny Acta got canned tonight or tomorrow.

:pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray:
:pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray: :pray:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #660 on: May 27, 2009, 10:26:26 pm »
Care to submit your suggestions via PM sportsfan?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #661 on: May 27, 2009, 10:26:40 pm »
4-19 without Flores behind the plate. Dagger.

9-14 with him.

NOW YOU'VE HEARD OF WIL NIEVES!!!

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #662 on: May 27, 2009, 10:26:41 pm »
This is why I hate fantasy sports. Even at this point I wouldn't want him to get a GS.
I know what you mean.  I play in a fantasy league and I needed to pick up a SS this week due to a couple injuries.  FLop was available and probably the best option, but I refused to pick him up b/c I can't stomach pulling for the guy on any level.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #663 on: May 27, 2009, 10:27:03 pm »
Was that Luke Montz clapping?

Kid looks like he's the only one into the game.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #664 on: May 27, 2009, 10:27:13 pm »
OMG I would throw a party Thursday night if Manny Acta got canned tonight or tomorrow.


Why not throw one anyway? Invite Dukes and AZ and one of them will cum.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #665 on: May 27, 2009, 10:27:43 pm »
Why not throw one anyway? Invite Dukes and AZ and one of them will cum.

:rofl:

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #666 on: May 27, 2009, 10:27:52 pm »
Carpenter thinks baseball has some explaining to do.  I think that baseball will have no comment whatsoever. 

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #667 on: May 27, 2009, 10:28:10 pm »
should've let montz pinch hit

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #668 on: May 27, 2009, 10:28:13 pm »
The Mets just    on the Nats.  :?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #669 on: May 27, 2009, 10:28:30 pm »
Why do the Mets fans even care? We owned Santana and blew the game.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #670 on: May 27, 2009, 10:28:34 pm »
Without a doubt tom.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12271
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #671 on: May 27, 2009, 10:28:46 pm »
Either the Lerners are retards or Manny Acta has impregnated his daughter - what in the world could be keeping him here?!?!? 

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #672 on: May 27, 2009, 10:29:22 pm »
Either the Lerners are retards or Manny Acta has impregnated his daughter - what in the world could be keeping him here?!?!? 

It's Rizzo's call - sheesh

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #673 on: May 27, 2009, 10:29:26 pm »
There is still a glimmer of hope!

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #674 on: May 27, 2009, 10:29:29 pm »
i'm watching a movie so please pm me or start a new post in caps letters letting me know if we somehow got rid of manny acta or made a shocking move.

at least balester and martin had good games.