The Google Web Browser

[The Chief]

Make sure you read the EULA, Mr Madison.  All your chrome WNFF posts now belong to Google

http://hardocp.com/news.html?news=MzQ2ODksLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdCwsLDE=

[Senators2005]

Make sure you read the EULA, Mr Madison.  All your chrome WNFF posts now belong to Google

http://hardocp.com/news.html?news=MzQ2ODksLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdCwsLDE=

 

[MrMadison]

Make sure you read the EULA, Mr Madison.  All your chrome WNFF posts now belong to Google

http://hardocp.com/news.html?news=MzQ2ODksLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdCwsLDE=

well..that's disconcerting.

I expect that to be removed relatively quickly as people discover it, and outrage begins.

I also expect Firefoxers to try and hold this over the head of teh googleites.

[The Chief]

I think this is about the point where the token Opera user is supposed to show up and remind us all that Opera is better.

[MrMadison]

I think this is about the point where the token Opera user is supposed to show up and remind us all that Opera is better.

hey, i used to really, really like Opera.

until they upgraded to 9.5, and it stopped working correctly with GMail.

[MrMadison]

Here is the Chrome privacy Policy in full. I'm reading through it now.

http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/privacy.html

[MrMadison]

Here is the Chrome privacy Policy in full. I'm reading through it now.

http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/privacy.html

after reading, I can't say I am overly concerned or freaked out by the EULA.

if anything, i can just use incognito mode and call it a day.

but even so...until i can block ads, I'm still on firefox. 

also i am trying to figure out why Chrome won't display the banner at the top of this board, but it renders everything else here perfectly.

[The Chief]

also i am trying to figure out why Chrome won't display the banner at the top of this board, but it renders everything else here perfectly.

I'm thinking it has a problem rendering background images.

[MrMadison]

I'm thinking it has a problem rendering background images.

oh, so that is a background image, and not necessarily a banner?

[The Chief]

oh, so that is a background image, and not necessarily a banner?

Yeah, easiest way to make it scale with various screen resolutions.

[MrMadison]

Yeah, easiest way to make it scale with various screen resolutions.

oh hah. I was under the impression that it was a banner all this time.

[MrMadison]

http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/common-google-chrome-objections/
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-communication/

enjoy.

[The Chief]

Shrug.  I'm really not that worried about it one way or another.  It's a nice-looking browser, and it is fast (though I don't personally feel it's any faster than Firefox), but until adblock or an equally effective option for Chrome exists, it will merely be an interesting toy to me.

And I posted this from chrome

JMad, you're lucky WNFF is an ad-free site, you can use chrome here all you want

[MrMadison]

well..that's disconcerting.

I expect that to be removed relatively quickly as people discover it, and outrage begins.

I also expect Firefoxers to try and hold this over the head of teh googleites.

told ya.

Update: Since this controversy has erupted, Google has removed the offending section of the Terms of Service.

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/does_google_have_rights_to_all.php