Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2008)  (Read 72334 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #300 on: September 03, 2008, 04:04:17 pm »
We will want to see him crucified and his spleen used to consecrate Citi Field. 

Citi Field? Oh, you mean the Giant Bedpan.


MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #301 on: September 03, 2008, 04:05:33 pm »
is this LetsGoTech guy the Mets version of NatsAddict?

Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #302 on: September 03, 2008, 04:07:12 pm »
is this LetsGoTech guy the Mets version of NatsAddict?

Yes he is. He is a friend of Minty Fresh and in the New Members thread he explained his purpose and alligences.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #303 on: September 03, 2008, 04:09:35 pm »
Statistically he was having a better year with the Nationals than Billy freaking Bray.

Right.  A better year with the Nats than F-Rod, too.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #304 on: September 03, 2008, 04:15:35 pm »
Yes he is. He is a friend of Minty Fresh and in the New Members thread he explained his purpose and alligences.

I meant in the "spend all day telling us how horrible his team and players are while they continue to whip ass on a daily basis" way.

Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #305 on: September 03, 2008, 04:19:43 pm »
I meant in the "spend all day telling us how horrible his team and players are while they continue to whip ass on a daily basis" way.

Oh, most definitely. :lol:

Offline mikehughes

  • Posts: 1375
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #306 on: September 03, 2008, 11:28:45 pm »
In the Muts win
Schneider hit a solo shot and Church hit a grand slam in the 1st inning

LetsGoTech

  • Guest
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #307 on: September 03, 2008, 11:55:56 pm »
I meant in the "spend all day telling us how horrible his team and players are while they continue to whip ass on a daily basis" way.

It's more like the "knowing full well that the other shoe is bound to drop any second now" way.  But close enough...

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #308 on: September 04, 2008, 10:27:36 am »
In the Muts win
Schneider hit a solo shot and Church hit a grand slam in the 1st inning

Church has impressive power for a 4th outfielder.  He ain't no Endy Chavez, but not bad for the occasional spot start.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #309 on: September 04, 2008, 11:38:41 am »
Church has impressive power for a 4th outfielder.  He ain't no Endy Chavez, but not bad for the occasional spot start.

Too bad he didn't show much of that here.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #310 on: September 04, 2008, 12:09:32 pm »
Church has impressive power for a 4th outfielder.  He ain't no Endy Chavez, but not bad for the occasional spot start.

cooperstown here he comes.


Too bad he didn't show much of that here.

this.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #311 on: September 04, 2008, 12:12:01 pm »
He was probably too preoccupied worrying about his girlfriend going to hell ;)

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #312 on: September 04, 2008, 01:15:31 pm »
He was probably too preoccupied worrying about his girlfriend going to hell ;)

He was too distracted by the extrapolation thread and the smooch fest. 

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #313 on: September 04, 2008, 01:22:02 pm »
Too bad he didn't show much of that here.

We didn't need him, we had Kearns and Wily Mo.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #314 on: September 04, 2008, 01:30:30 pm »
We didn't need him, we had Kearns and Wily Mo.

Willie Harris > Church :lol:

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #315 on: September 04, 2008, 01:34:50 pm »
We didn't need him, we had Kearns and Wily Mo.

yeah how foolish were we to trade away such a guaranteed Hall of Famer. I mean he's like, the greatest OFer in baseball.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #316 on: September 04, 2008, 01:43:18 pm »
Well at this point I'd certainly take him over Wily Mo or Kearns, there's no denying that.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18595
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #317 on: September 04, 2008, 02:01:39 pm »
Schneider's OBS is higher than Flores's at this point.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #318 on: September 05, 2008, 07:07:02 pm »
Well at this point I'd certainly take him over Wily Mo or Kearns, there's no denying that.

I'd take a nine layer bean burrito over Wily Mo or Kearns.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #319 on: September 05, 2008, 11:59:49 pm »
I'd take a nine layer bean burrito over Wily Mo or Kearns.
Oooh, that DOES sound good.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #320 on: September 06, 2008, 12:19:47 am »
fast food is gross

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #321 on: September 06, 2008, 01:20:01 am »
fast food is gross

Are you sure you're.... nevermind.  :?

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #322 on: September 06, 2008, 06:38:40 pm »
Yeah, sorta.  But I gotta admit - Five Guys is irresistable!

No matter how many fries they fill the bag with, I never, ever leave one.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #323 on: September 06, 2008, 09:29:06 pm »
Yeah, sorta.  But I gotta admit - Five Guys is irresistable!

For me, Five Guys is not fast food, because it's prepared fresh. Everything in the restaurant is fresh. Everything but original Five Guys (Springfield, Alexandria, Arlington) is a bit of a sacrilege, but I'll muddle through :)

Haven't eaten McDonald's, Taco Bell, KFC, A&W, Wendy's, and the like for years.

Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread
« Reply #324 on: September 06, 2008, 09:33:38 pm »
Princess Soriano is 4-5 with three home runs in tonight's thomping of the Reds.