Author Topic: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3  (Read 7667 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12263
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #100: August 02, 2007, 08:00:29 PM »
Although Dick Pole has to be better than Dick Trickle.  :shock:
I think one comes before the other.   ;)

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #101: August 02, 2007, 08:00:56 PM »
Good job Nats ... nice and easy here now Big Mike ...

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 75056
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #102: August 02, 2007, 08:01:00 PM »
Flores is not looking good tonight.

Offline eagleskins

  • BANNED FOREVER
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #103: August 02, 2007, 08:02:09 PM »
Flores looks awful at the plate tonight.  The top of our order is doing their job.  The bottom is not. 

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #104: August 02, 2007, 08:02:17 PM »
Now, how will Mike respond to getting back to a tie game?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 75056
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #105: August 02, 2007, 08:03:00 PM »
Hey did anyone read the article at the Nats website where Lerner is praising how well we have played since May 11th and how he talks about how much better this team can be with our injured players healthy? I don't know if Ken's pessimism is getting to me but that troubled me.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #106: August 02, 2007, 08:04:16 PM »
Hey did anyone read the article at the Nats website where Lerner is praising how well we have played since May 11th and how he talks about how much better this team can be with our injured players healthy? I don't know if Ken's pessimism is getting to me but that troubled me.

Why would that be "troubling"?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 75056
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #107: August 02, 2007, 08:06:03 PM »
Why would that be "troubling"?

Because it seemed like a setup to say that they don't need to write checks because our team is good enough as it is with our injured players back.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #108: August 02, 2007, 08:06:44 PM »
Good inning Mike!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 75056
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #109: August 02, 2007, 08:06:48 PM »
Nice inning by Bacsik.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93630
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #110: August 02, 2007, 08:06:49 PM »
that's more like it, Mike.. come on BATS

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12263
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #111: August 02, 2007, 08:07:01 PM »
4 strikeouts for Bacsik  :clap:

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #112: August 02, 2007, 08:07:10 PM »
Should we start another Mike Bacsik appreciation thread??? :lol:

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #113: August 02, 2007, 08:07:26 PM »
Hey did anyone read the article at the Nats website where Lerner is praising how well we have played since May 11th and how he talks about how much better this team can be with our injured players healthy? I don't know if Ken's pessimism is getting to me but that troubled me.


Keep the faith Spidey -     :koolaid:  I read it to mean we're not as far away as everyone would like to think ...

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12263
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #114: August 02, 2007, 08:08:21 PM »
Because it seemed like a setup to say that they don't need to write checks because our team is good enough as it is ...
That's fine, I'll tell Ted that I don't need any tickets next year because they are obviously satisfied with attendance as it is.   :?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #115: August 02, 2007, 08:09:51 PM »
We need to "dispose" of this pitcher, this inning, and get into their bullpen.

Offline KyleScha

  • Posts: 1729
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #116: August 02, 2007, 08:09:54 PM »
why is Nook so bad at bunting?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #117: August 02, 2007, 08:10:36 PM »
We need to "dispose" of this pitcher, this inning, and get into their bullpen.

Well, that's not likely to happen with an out and the  pitcher at bat.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 75056
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #118: August 02, 2007, 08:11:07 PM »
That's fine, I'll tell Ted that I don't need any tickets next year because they are obviously satisfied with attendance as it is.   :?

Great point but what if you already paid for your tickets by the time we realize they won't bring in some offensive help?

He did say that he thinks Manny will be an All Star manager. I wonder if he realizes what that means and how that comes about.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #119: August 02, 2007, 08:12:09 PM »
Nice HIT BIG MIKE!

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #120: August 02, 2007, 08:12:11 PM »
Well, that's not likely to happen with an out and the  pitcher at bat.

Never mind. :lol:

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12263
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #121: August 02, 2007, 08:12:15 PM »
Hahaha Mike's come out tonight to play some baseball.  :pimp:

Offline KyleScha

  • Posts: 1729
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #122: August 02, 2007, 08:12:19 PM »
Bacsik really has that opposite field stroke down.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 75056
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #123: August 02, 2007, 08:12:40 PM »

Keep the faith Spidey -     :koolaid:  I read it to mean we're not as far away as everyone would like to think ...

I'll try my best wpa. I  :pray: you're correct. And thank you for the drink that restored my hope.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 75056
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #124: August 02, 2007, 08:13:09 PM »
Bacsik really has that opposite field stroke down.

Yep. We have to reclaim the lead.