Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1 (Read 30540 times)

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #175 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:38:04 pm »

Quote from: spidernat on July 27, 2007, 08:36:58 pm

We need to get that run right back plus tax.

GREAT CALL!!! KEARNS HOMERS!

spidernat · « **Reply #176 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:38:07 pm »

Quote from: ronnynat on July 27, 2007, 08:36:52 pm

Alright, not bad, Bacsik! More than I ever expect out of him. It's hard for me to expect much out of someone that lives off throwing meat balls. That's why I want more out of the oface.

So we got "meat ball" Bacsik and "beach ball" Bergmann

Kearns with a big one!

Naticus Maximus · « **Reply #177 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:38:15 pm »

well...got the run back..whatta blast!

wpa2629 · « **Reply #178 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:38:16 pm »

Got it RIGHT BACK! Nice SHOT AUSTIN!

2k6nats · « **Reply #179 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:38:30 pm »

ALL RIGHT KEARNS!

KyleScha · « **Reply #180 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:38:48 pm »

Kearns AND Church homer in the same game? WTF is going on!?

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #181 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:39:03 pm »

Kearns and Church both homer in the same game

ronnynat · « **Reply #182 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:41:15 pm »

Quote from: sportsfan882 on July 27, 2007, 08:39:03 pm

Kearns and Church both homer in the same game

that's what I was thinking. I missed it..did he bash it?

spidernat · « **Reply #183 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:41:17 pm »

Quote from: KyleScha on July 27, 2007, 08:38:48 pm

Kearns AND Church homer in the same game? WTF is going on!?

That has to be Kearns' game. Eventually he'll hit some with runners aboard, Zimmerman and Young could've been on base for that if not for Young being thrown out at second.

KyleScha · « **Reply #184 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:41:34 pm »

It didn't look like Nook went there

metssuck · « **Reply #185 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:41:39 pm »

nook didn't even go around. he never gets the benefit of the doubt

spidernat · « **Reply #186 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:42:07 pm »

Quote from: ronnynat on July 27, 2007, 08:41:15 pm

that's what I was thinking. I missed it..did he bash it?

Yeah he crushed it.

ronnynat · « **Reply #187 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:42:25 pm »

Quote from: spidernat on July 27, 2007, 08:38:07 pm

So we got "meat ball" Bacsik and "beach ball" Bergmann

Bergmann can at least hit 89, though.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #188 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:43:05 pm »

Bacsik having some good ABs tonight.. Alright Mike, I don't think it's too much to ask for him to give us 1 more scoreless inning

spidernat · « **Reply #189 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:43:30 pm »

So the lead is back to 3. That's tonight's number. It's creepy to think of that when you see wpa's post count

KyleScha · « **Reply #190 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:43:59 pm »

Quote from: ronnynat on July 27, 2007, 08:42:25 pm

Bergmann can at least hit 89, though.

Did anyone notice it seemed Bergmann's velocity was down a bit after coming off the DL? I remember him being in the 91-92 range and occasionally hitting 93, but seems to be upper 80's since he returned.

ronnynat · « **Reply #191 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:44:15 pm »

The offense is REALLY getting Bacsik's back tonight. He needs to do his part...just one more inning please!

wpa2629 · « **Reply #192 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:44:33 pm »

Yep ... winning by 3,333 runs tonight would be GREAT!

spidernat · « **Reply #193 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:44:59 pm »

He has the bottom of the lineup due up but that doesn't make me feel any better. I would like to get 2 more innings out of Bacsik in light of tomorrow's double header but maintaining the lead is our number 1 priority.

ronnynat · « **Reply #194 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:45:23 pm »

Quote from: KyleScha on July 27, 2007, 08:43:59 pm

Did anyone notice it seemed Bergmann's velocity was down a bit after coming off the DL? I remember him being in the 91-92 range and occasionally hitting 93, but seems to be upper 80's since he returned.

You're definitely right. He hit 93 quite a few times in his 10 K performance. Can't wait until that's back. We need AT LEAST one pitcher who can throw 93+.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #195 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:45:30 pm »

Bacsik's pitch count is only at 56

uh oh

spidernat · « **Reply #196 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:46:12 pm »

Quote from: wpa2629 on July 27, 2007, 08:44:33 pm

Yep ... winning by 3,333 runs tonight would be GREAT!

How long would that game last?

2k6nats · « **Reply #197 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:46:31 pm »

Quote from: sportsfan882 on July 27, 2007, 08:45:30 pm

Bacsik's pitch count is only at 56 uh oh

That doesn't necessarily mean he's been pitching well; more like the hitters are too tempted by his beachballs, and swing early.

spidernat · « **Reply #198 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:46:45 pm »

Quote from: ronnynat on July 27, 2007, 08:45:23 pm

You're definitely right. He hit 93 quite a few times in his 10 K performance. Can't wait until that's back. We need AT LEAST one pitcher who can throw 93+.

Redding has been clocked at 94.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #199 on:** July 27, 2007, 08:46:49 pm »

Bacsik can't get the lefties out