Author Topic: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026  (Read 519 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline imref

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 50846
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #25 on: January 28, 2026, 05:11:52 pm »
McDaniel's expanded top-200 has a lot more Nats:

117. Gavin Fien, SS
121. Luke Dickerson, SS
133. Devin Fitz-Gerald, SS
182. Seaver King, SS
190. Alejandro Rosario, RHP

Offline imref

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 50846
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #26 on: January 29, 2026, 08:48:29 am »
Law ranks our farm system in "Tier 2", 6th overall.

Quote
The Nationals have certainly restocked their system in the last seven months, trading MacKenzie Gore for five prospects, four of whom are on their top 20; trading Jose A. Ferrer for a former top 100 prospect, Harry Ford; and picking up four more guys on their top 20 in smaller trades last July — all on top of having the No. 1 pick in the 2025 draft, which they used to take prep shortstop Eli Willits. On paper, it’s a lot of talent, but it’s also a lot of underperforming talent, at least relative to expectations when those players were drafted or first emerged as real prospects, giving the new front office a significant challenge in their first year on the job.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 12960
  • Sunshine Squad 2025
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #27 on: January 30, 2026, 11:15:04 am »
I think our system right now is looking pretty strong in A and A+, rough in AA and AAA.

I don't mind that timeline. This coming season will be terrible, 2027 will be optimistically a shortened season.

I'm also really excited by Eli Willits. I thought the pick was more defensible than some made it out to be, and the early returns were top notch.

I'll leave to the main board the validity of the reports the Nats turned down Josuar Gonzalez for Abrams, but if that's true then a CJ Abrams trade return could leave this the deepest system we've had in a long time versus relying on a single prospect or two at the top to carry the day.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8235
  • The one true ace
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #28 on: January 30, 2026, 10:34:07 pm »
I think our system right now is looking pretty strong in A and A+, rough in AA and AAA.

I don't mind that timeline. This coming season will be terrible, 2027 will be optimistically a shortened season.

I'm also really excited by Eli Willits. I thought the pick was more defensible than some made it out to be, and the early returns were top notch.

I'll leave to the main board the validity of the reports the Nats turned down Josuar Gonzalez for Abrams, but if that's true then a CJ Abrams trade return could leave this the deepest system we've had in a long time versus relying on a single prospect or two at the top to carry the day.


Probably since the Eaton trade. That offseason we were going to have the top system per bba before we dealt giolito and Lopez. Both were top 60 prospects at that point

Offline imref

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 50846
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #29 on: February 04, 2026, 12:51:57 pm »
Zuck (still covering the Nats):
Quote
Baseball America’s 2026 rankings have the Nationals’ farm system 16th out of 30 clubs. They ranked 14th last year, 15th the year before that.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 49271
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #30 on: February 04, 2026, 02:35:23 pm »
Zuck (still covering the Nats):
did that predate the Gore trade?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 69088
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2026, 08:26:19 pm »
Even that seems high. All of this team's upside is either in Single A, or injured.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 12960
  • Sunshine Squad 2025
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2026, 10:32:01 pm »
Even that seems high. All of this team's upside is either in Single A, or injured.
I think 16th is a bit low if post-Gore trade, but I don't disagree all the upside is hurt or in Wilmington and Fredericksburg. Very high ceiling, very low floor, lots of volatility.


Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28755
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #34 on: February 05, 2026, 07:29:00 am »
I think 16th is a bit low if post-Gore trade, but I don't disagree all the upside is hurt or in Wilmington and Fredericksburg. Very high ceiling, very low floor, lots of volatility.
I mean how do you or anyone else here really know.  Are you familiar with the contents of all the other teams farm systems.  I know I’m not.  Seems better to just focus on our top guys and see how they progress. The overall rankings seem meaningless in the scheme of things.  If looking at probably best to average out rankings by different evaluators. The guys who allegedly do look at all the teams.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 49271
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #35 on: February 05, 2026, 10:55:28 am »
This system looks very different from a couple of years ago. Then, all the value was in a few top end guys - Wood, Crews, and not much else. This system lacks the close to the majors position players of high value. Even Willits and Fien are not seen as locks close to the majors. As Slate says, add in Sykora's injury and Susana questions, the system doesn't explode with locks that are likely above average.

 That said, it's extremely deep in terms of guys worth tracking and who have a decent shot at being something. They hit on one out of 5 of their 35+ or better and that's a lot of of help. I think they will likely have more than 50 guys in the next FG system review. They had 44 at the end of last year and added another 6 in the Ferrer and Gore deals, plus the international signings. If there's an Abrams or even a Garcia deal, it only gets deeper.

I can see maybe a ranking around 10-12 for the system now, but I can see that jumping with another draft, development of Fien and Willits removing uncertainty,  and some of the pitchers getting healthy.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 18944
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #36 on: February 05, 2026, 11:04:11 am »
Why not rate systems on their ability to develop players?

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 49271
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #37 on: February 05, 2026, 11:14:34 am »
Why not rate systems on their ability to develop players?
harder to do? I suppose you could do some sort of measure of yield, like how many draft picks end up in the majors, with extra credit for guys who are regulars or throw so many quality innings, and more credit for legit star level players. Give some extra credit for later rounds and undrafted free agents. Sounds complex but that would be a numbers-based test.

As much as I like numbers, I think a better way is to poll smart people (gms, writers, other analysts,...) to get a sense. That might be better at tracking improvement of an organization. Most development guys don't stick around long enough for the numbers approach to measure their work.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 69088
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #38 on: February 05, 2026, 11:50:14 am »
Why not rate systems on their ability to develop players?
I actually think that goes into ranking farm systems.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 49271
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #39 on: February 05, 2026, 12:22:40 pm »
I actually think that goes into ranking farm systems.
then past rankings of the Nats system probably were below the raw talent level figuring we couldn't teach them up

Online blue911

  • Posts: 18944
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #40 on: February 05, 2026, 02:49:23 pm »
Bowden drafted Zim and Lannan in 2005. I’m much more impressed with Lannan’s development than Zim’s who came fully formed.

Offline imref

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 50846
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #41 on: February 07, 2026, 09:56:51 am »
Law's Nats top 20:
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7022510/2026/02/06/washington-nationals-2026-top-100-prospects-keith-law/

1. Willits
2. Fien
3. King
4. Sykora
5. Ford
6. Susana
7. Dickerson
8. Peterson
9. Perales
10. Clemmey

He says Abimelec Ortiz (16) should get a shot at 1B and that Rosario still hasn't had TJ.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 49271
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals Prospect Reports / Minor League Rankings: 2026
« Reply #42 on: February 07, 2026, 11:38:10 am »
No Fitz-Gerald or Rosario in the top 20?

Is Dickerson that high by default or enthusiasm?