Author Topic: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)  (Read 20477 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online imref

  • Posts: 54058
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #225 on: March 26, 2026, 07:50:22 pm »
I have no clue who Jay Cuda is, but that's kind of a sophomoric take...

Sports satirist

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 29367
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #226 on: March 26, 2026, 08:24:33 pm »
Sports satirist
He should be full time with Washington sports teams.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 32851
  • King of Goodness
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #227 on: March 26, 2026, 08:55:39 pm »
He should be full time with Washington Post sports reporters teams.

FIFY

Online imref

  • Posts: 54058
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #228 on: March 26, 2026, 10:58:36 pm »
McGonigle debut: 4-5, 2-2B

Online imref

  • Posts: 54058
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #229 on: March 30, 2026, 02:45:57 pm »
Langford's first weekend: .071 BA / .142 OPS, 1 for 14, 4Ks, 0BBs

Online imref

  • Posts: 54058
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #230 on: April 11, 2026, 09:45:35 am »
Langford hurt again (quad) and heading for an MRI. Would be his fifth trip to the IL if that's where he ends up.

Online imref

  • Posts: 54058
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #231 on: May 07, 2026, 11:33:05 am »
Nightengale:
Quote
How sensational is Skenes’ start? He now has a career 2.01 ERA, the lowest ERA by any pitcher through his first 63 starts since at least 1920. He has made 22 scoreless starts, which are the most by any pitcher through 63 starts since at least 1901.

Offline SkinsNatFan21RIP

  • Posts: 2040
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #232 on: May 07, 2026, 11:45:43 am »
Nightengale:

And we lost him all because of a completely unnecessary draft lottery.

Offline IanRubbish

  • Posts: 4618
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #233 on: May 12, 2026, 12:25:48 am »
Skenes K rate is down a little, but he leads MLB in K/BB.

Offline rileyn

  • Posts: 4354
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #234 on: July 02, 2026, 06:50:21 am »
This is getting interesting.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 71041
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #235 on: July 02, 2026, 07:50:05 am »
This is getting interesting.
It is? What about it is getting interesting?

Skenes was RoY and has a Cy Young.
Langford currently hitting .278/.324/.500 in 40 games this season

Meanwhile, Crews is still one of the worst hitters on the team

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13965
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, dog
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #236 on: July 02, 2026, 08:36:50 am »
Skenes might be hurt and/or heading for TJS. Getting roughed up and 4-Seam spin rates way down.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 71041
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #237 on: July 02, 2026, 08:58:54 am »
Skenes might be hurt and/or heading for TJS. Getting roughed up and 4-Seam spin rates way down.
Yea, but that always seemed like a given because of the velocity.

Online imref

  • Posts: 54058
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #238 on: July 02, 2026, 09:11:57 am »
X analysts say his mechanics have changed.

Online imref

  • Posts: 54058
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #239 on: July 02, 2026, 09:46:53 am »
It is? What about it is getting interesting?

Skenes was RoY and has a Cy Young.
Langford currently hitting .278/.324/.500 in 40 games this season

Meanwhile, Crews is still one of the worst hitters on the team

Skenes is struggling as of late and already given up one fewer run than he did all of last season.

Langford can't stay healthy. He was back for 3 weeks and pulled his hamstring and is back on the IL.

Meanwhile Crews is raking. (last 15: .293 / .349 / .397 / .746)

You judge these things in years, not in a couple of seasons.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 71041
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #240 on: July 02, 2026, 10:09:42 am »
Skenes is struggling as of late and already given up one fewer run than he did all of last season.

Langford can't stay healthy. He was back for 3 weeks and pulled his hamstring and is back on the IL.

Meanwhile Crews is raking. (last 15: .293 / .349 / .397 / .746)

You judge these things in years, not in a couple of seasons.

In three years, Paul Skenes has won the RoY and a Cy Young, accumulating 13.4 fWAR. Wyatt Langford is a career 117 wRC+, accumulating 8.7 fWAR and has played twice as many games as Dylan.

Crews has a long, long way to go and a 15 game hot streak doesn't make this interesting.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13965
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, dog
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #241 on: July 02, 2026, 11:52:38 am »
X analysts say his mechanics have changed.

Saw that also, specifically comparing last year’s mechanics to this year’s. But also his spin rates are plummeting even this year when looking at outings.

Hopefully the Pirates have the resources and technology to best track and protect him.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 54203
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #242 on: July 02, 2026, 01:49:55 pm »
In three years, Paul Skenes has won the RoY and a Cy Young, accumulating 13.4 fWAR. Wyatt Langford is a career 117 wRC+, accumulating 8.7 fWAR and has played twice as many games as Dylan.

Crews has a long, long way to go and a 15 game hot streak doesn't make this interesting.
I think Brendan Gawloski over at FG was in the Pirates scouting ./development / player acquisition side. I'd love it if he'd spill the beans on how close they had Crews to Skenes and how close Langford was. Did it come down to money or was it always going to be Skenes?

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 29367
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #243 on: July 02, 2026, 02:15:50 pm »
Whenever I see a pitcher be great and then fall off means he has some injury and probably something major coming.  Changing mechanics is a sign.  He’s probably trying to fight through discomfort.

Online imref

  • Posts: 54058
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #244 on: July 02, 2026, 03:02:17 pm »
FWIW, Langford was drafted 4th after Max Clark. Clark is at AAA and is putting up decent numbers.


Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 32851
  • King of Goodness
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #245 on: July 02, 2026, 04:25:10 pm »
Skenes is struggling as of late and already given up one fewer run than he did all of last season.

Langford can't stay healthy. He was back for 3 weeks and pulled his hamstring and is back on the IL.

Meanwhile Crews is raking. (last 15: .293 / .349 / .397 / .746)

You judge these things in years, not in a couple of seasons.

But you want to judge it by the last 15 games?

Crews has been worth roughly what Jose Tena has been worth...or Jacob Young...

Online imref

  • Posts: 54058
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #246 on: July 02, 2026, 05:06:38 pm »
But you want to judge it by the last 15 games?

Crews has been worth roughly what Jose Tena has been worth...or Jacob Young...

These constant Crews-bashing posts are aging worse and worse.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 32851
  • King of Goodness
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #247 on: July 02, 2026, 06:00:40 pm »
These constant Crews-bashing posts are aging worse and worse.

Not as bad as the constant fan boi comments about how unlucky he is...and how he would have had another RBI if his bat hadn't broken, and various other excuses...

Look at the stats...OVER THE YEARS...they don't lie...

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 32851
  • King of Goodness
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #248 on: July 02, 2026, 06:14:34 pm »
MLB Career Numbers:

Crews has been worth roughly what Jose Tena has been worth...or Jacob Young...

Crews:  .217/.282/.357/.639

Young:  .242/.302/.329/.631

Tena:  .244/.299/.356/.655

...and people bash Tena.

...and Langford:

Langford:  .251/.333/.434/.767

Online imref

  • Posts: 54058
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #249 on: July 07, 2026, 12:35:20 pm »