Author Topic: Immaculate grid  (Read 7092 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #75 on: September 21, 2023, 12:31:09 pm »
Today was frustrating as I could just not think of anyone playing for the teams that matched.

For the nba version of this Ish Smith, Kevin Ollie and Joe Smith are like Edwin Jackson for baseball.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18570
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #76 on: September 21, 2023, 04:26:16 pm »
Yeah I only got 4/9 yesterday. I did use Frank Thomas for the White Sox .300 hitter though.

Shoeless Joe was my pick. I like using the old-timers .

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 3830
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #77 on: September 23, 2023, 09:22:13 am »
Ugh, today's should have been a pretty easy 9/9 but I wasted two guesses learning that neither Kris Bryant or Anthony Rizzo ever had .300 seasons with the Cubs.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #78 on: September 23, 2023, 09:52:55 am »
Got 8 of 9.  Cheated on the last one to see what happened if I got them all!  Average score so far is 8.3.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16298
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #79 on: September 28, 2023, 08:59:44 pm »
These 200-hit/200-strikeout things really keep screwing me over.

Yesterday it's Will Clark never reached 200 hits for the Giants, today it's John Lackey never got 200 Ks in a season for the Angels (even though he hit 199 in 2005 :bang: ).

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 3830
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #80 on: September 29, 2023, 08:29:14 am »
These 200-hit/200-strikeout things really keep screwing me over.

Yesterday it's Will Clark never reached 200 hits for the Giants, today it's John Lackey never got 200 Ks in a season for the Angels (even though he hit 199 in 2005 :bang: ).

200 hits especially gets me since you can be an elite hitter and never reach that mark by walking too much (e.g., Ted Williams).

200 Ks is a bit easier since most good modern pitchers hit that mark in a full season while good pitchers from previous generations often reach it just from virtue of throwing so many more innings.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #81 on: September 29, 2023, 08:51:57 am »
Yep. Me too. Gold Gloves have been hard also for teams I don’t follow.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #82 on: October 06, 2023, 01:38:13 pm »
Nats featured today. First time I got all nine without help.

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 3830
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #83 on: October 12, 2023, 09:53:58 am »
Today's was absolutely brutal for me. Only managed 3/9.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #84 on: October 31, 2023, 09:32:28 am »
They added first round draft pick today.  Threw me off. Was only able to get for one of the three teams listed.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 46590
  • Re-contending in 202...6?
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #85 on: November 06, 2023, 07:25:27 am »

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #86 on: November 08, 2023, 09:49:43 am »
Got one of my few immaculate scores today.  Nationals featured. Got a rarity score of 85 which is definitely my lowest. 

Sometime the awards throw me off because I don’t know when they started.  Like when did the Silver Slugger start?  Should look it up to help play the game.


Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 3830
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #87 on: November 08, 2023, 02:04:31 pm »
Got one of my few immaculate scores today.  Nationals featured. Got a rarity score of 85 which is definitely my lowest. 

Sometime the awards throw me off because I don’t know when they started.  Like when did the Silver Slugger start?  Should look it up to help play the game.

Nice! 160 for me.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #88 on: November 08, 2023, 02:31:49 pm »
Nice! 160 for me.
It’s funny how old names pop into your head some days.

FYI the Silver Slugger started 1980. 

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #89 on: August 12, 2024, 08:15:38 am »
Nationals are featured today!  Seemed an easy one overall. 

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 3830
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #90 on: August 12, 2024, 08:39:08 am »
I should start playing this again.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 12101
  • Sunshine Squad 2024
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #91 on: August 12, 2024, 12:04:26 pm »
I somehow played this for first time today with Nationals. Got 8/9, score of 213. Clicked the wrong box on mistake putting in an answer or would have been perfect. Now addicted and playing old ones, where I'm not near as good.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #92 on: August 12, 2024, 04:23:07 pm »
I got all correct today with a rarity score of 80.  Going back to the expos part of the franchise helped with that. Also used a former Nats player in one of the other blocks.  Yesterday was very hard. Only got four before I gave up. The other sports tend to be even harder for me.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 46590
  • Re-contending in 202...6?
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #93 on: August 12, 2024, 04:29:17 pm »
nice. I got the nationals ones correct but struggled with the twins.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #94 on: August 12, 2024, 04:36:12 pm »
nice. I got the nationals ones correct but struggled with the twins.
Probably ruining this for others but the Nats had a couple of guys who played the same position for the Twinkies.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #95 on: August 14, 2024, 08:36:24 am »
Today was fun. No teams. Just career milestones.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #96 on: October 23, 2024, 08:20:58 am »
Nationals featured today.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27689
Re: Immaculate grid
« Reply #97 on: March 11, 2025, 12:11:59 pm »
Easy one today.  Got all and a rarity score of 23.  Think that's my best ever.