Author Topic: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1  (Read 747 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63339
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #75: May 26, 2023, 10:37:49 PM »
edwards and thompson? kuhl with a clean 8th?

Yea, lets see Kuhl. freak it

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39920
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #76: May 26, 2023, 10:41:21 PM »
crazy game

Offline welch

  • Posts: 16445
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #77: May 26, 2023, 10:42:51 PM »
Go, Jeimer!

Online imref

  • Posts: 43080
  • Re-contending in 202...5?

Offline Dave in Fairfax

  • Posts: 2118
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #79: May 26, 2023, 10:43:50 PM »
That looked like a cricket swing from Garrett.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31446
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #80: May 26, 2023, 10:44:46 PM »
Nice response from the offense.

Online imref

  • Posts: 43080
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #81: May 26, 2023, 10:47:10 PM »
Awful AB

Online imref

  • Posts: 43080
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #82: May 26, 2023, 10:50:12 PM »
Abrams does not like to take pitches.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39920
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #83: May 26, 2023, 10:52:27 PM »
Abrams does not like to take pitches.
unless they are off his body

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39920
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #84: May 26, 2023, 10:53:44 PM »
weird night for Lane. leadoff HR but plenty of LOBs.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31446
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #85: May 26, 2023, 11:01:41 PM »
freaking awful umpire. Damn.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39920
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #86: May 26, 2023, 11:01:43 PM »
you knew they were not  going to get strike 4 on Pasquatch

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39920
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #87: May 26, 2023, 11:03:45 PM »
beats me why kuhl didn't start this inning or the 7th. bringing him in with bases loaded to face perez and witt is a bit tough.

Offline nfotiu

  • Posts: 5046
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #88: May 26, 2023, 11:04:22 PM »
I love a good pitching duel!

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39920
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #89: May 26, 2023, 11:10:00 PM »
I'll take that from kuhl. that could have been a complete disaster.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18063
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #90: May 26, 2023, 11:13:48 PM »
Is this the Darnell Coles revenge game for all the crapting on him me and slate did today

Offline nfotiu

  • Posts: 5046
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #91: May 26, 2023, 11:13:55 PM »
I'll take that from kuhl. that could have been a complete disaster.
8 ERA is less than a run an inning.   Bases loaded changes that math obviously.   A couple runs is probably about expected, so all good!

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39920
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #92: May 26, 2023, 11:17:35 PM »
8 ERA is less than a run an inning.   Bases loaded changes that math obviously.   A couple runs is probably about expected, so all good!
they bring him in with bases loaded 1 out to face perez witt melendez and he gets out with only 2 runs. that's fine. it's on davey for what preceded him.

i'll say up front that having him ptch the 9th is the right call even if he blows the game

Online imref

  • Posts: 43080
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #93: May 26, 2023, 11:18:20 PM »
:nervous:

Online imref

  • Posts: 43080
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #94: May 26, 2023, 11:19:05 PM »
I thought games weren’t supposed to take this long??

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39920
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #95: May 26, 2023, 11:23:43 PM »
:w:

i'll say up front that having him ptch the 9th is the right call even if he blows the game

Online imref

  • Posts: 43080
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #96: May 26, 2023, 11:24:15 PM »
The new Daniel Hudson??

:w:

4-2 over our last 6.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63339
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #97: May 26, 2023, 11:24:24 PM »
Maybe Kuhl should be the closer?

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39920
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #98: May 26, 2023, 11:25:42 PM »
oh  please bob. don't mention erasmo and edwards getting the job done tonight unless you are a cardiologist looking for work

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39920
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals @ Royals, Game 1
« Reply #99: May 26, 2023, 11:26:13 PM »
Maybe Kuhl should be the closer?
the next thompson.