Author Topic: NFL 2023-24  (Read 20377 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 45715
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #450: December 26, 2023, 10:49:33 AM »
Lamar put on a show yesterday. Run-CMC looked great in the first half but seemed to fall out of the game plan later. I think only one or two of Purdy's INTs were his fault, the rest were tipped balls or missed catches. Lamar definitely made a case for MVP.

Miami - Baltimore should be fun, but Miami is just so inconsistent.

The Chiefs are heading on the road for the first time in the Mahomes era assuming they hold on to make the playoffs.

I really want to see Baltimore vs Cleveland in the AFC title game.

Offline GataNats

  • Posts: 2414
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #451: December 27, 2023, 12:01:44 AM »
No MVPurdy.  Lamar it is.  Now that he is the front runner he will screw up against Miami.

CMC is the MVP

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27230
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #452: December 27, 2023, 09:00:49 AM »
CMC is the MVP
He probably should be but the QBs have more impact according to the voters.   He had a nice game Monday and his team was still pounded.  Jackson’s to lose now.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 45715
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #453: December 27, 2023, 09:13:56 AM »
Tyreek Hill is in the mix too. And of course Baltimore plays Miami this weekend.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27230
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #454: December 27, 2023, 09:29:23 AM »
Tyreek Hill is in the mix too. And of course Baltimore plays Miami this weekend.
I agree but he is 6th on the Vegas odds. 


https://www.vegasinsider.com/nfl/odds/mvp/

Offline imref

  • Posts: 45715
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #455: December 27, 2023, 02:25:37 PM »
Clock strikes midnight for Howell, Russell Wilson, and Tommy Cutlets.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 43749
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #456: December 27, 2023, 02:43:33 PM »
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2023/12/27/broncos-bench-russell-wilson/

Between Brissett, Jarrett Stidham (Wilson's successor), and Zappe, it's a good year for at least some for NE backups. Jimmy G, not so much.

Offline English Natsie

  • Posts: 618
  • It's baseball, Jim, but not as we know it...
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #457: December 27, 2023, 07:21:09 PM »
Chiefs coaching, and office, staff with a huge job, this off-season, rebuilding the offence. Shows how, even with Mahomes, the wheels can come off pretty quickly.... :roll:

Offline imref

  • Posts: 45715
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #458: December 28, 2023, 10:08:52 PM »
watching the Jets - Browns tonight and someone is banging a trash can during Jets kicking attempts. Al Michaels quipped that the Astros must be in town. :hysterical:

Offline imref

  • Posts: 45715
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #459: December 28, 2023, 10:26:09 PM »
i'm in two fantasy football league championships tonight. I have the Browns defense in one league, and my opponent has them in the other league.

Guess which one has money involved. :(

Offline imref

  • Posts: 45715
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #460: December 28, 2023, 11:23:05 PM »
Browns in the playoffs!

Offline imref

  • Posts: 45715
  • Re-contending in 202...5?

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27230
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #462: December 30, 2023, 09:07:56 PM »
Not easy to root for Dallas but I’m trying. 

Offline imref

  • Posts: 45715
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NBA 2023-24
« Reply #463: December 30, 2023, 11:18:07 PM »
Crazy finish in Dallas. Campbell is going to be questioned for a long time over the decision to go for two and the failure of his OL to report as eligible.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27230
Re: Re: NBA 2023-24
« Reply #464: December 31, 2023, 07:35:49 AM »
Crazy finish in Dallas. Campbell is going to be questioned for a long time over the decision to go for two and the failure of his OL to report as eligible.
Jerruh paid the red to not listen when the guy reported.  It’s all good.  Clears the way for the Eagles to get the second seed in the NFC.  I think the first going for two made sense.  It’s possible you never even get the ball in OT.  Next one was too far.  Third one?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 45715
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Re: NBA 2023-24
« Reply #465: December 31, 2023, 09:13:58 AM »
Of course I posted this in the wrong thread :(

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27230
Re: Re: NBA 2023-24
« Reply #466: December 31, 2023, 09:24:24 AM »
LOL.  Fooled my old eyes.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 43749
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #467: December 31, 2023, 09:49:26 AM »
Clean up on aisle 6.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21718
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #468: December 31, 2023, 10:01:32 AM »
Jerruh paid the red to not listen when the guy reported.  It’s all good.  Clears the way for the Eagles to get the second seed in the NFC.  I think the first going for two made sense.  It’s possible you never even get the ball in OT.  Next one was too far.  Third one?
https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/18uzhmo/monson_goff_literally_sends_decker_over_to_report/

I can’t wait to see the NFL try to explain this

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27230
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #469: December 31, 2023, 10:11:30 AM »
He didn’t say the magic words. Pretty pretty please.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27230
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #470: December 31, 2023, 10:32:31 AM »
Seems like the Lions tried to confuse Dallas by having two guys approach the ref but only one report. And then the ref confused the two. 

https://www.mlive.com/lions/2023/12/nfls-explanation-contradicts-lions-side-of-questionable-finish-in-dallas.html?outputType=amp

Offline imref

  • Posts: 45715
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #471: December 31, 2023, 10:34:32 AM »
The TV ref noted that #68 didn't line up against anyone, which was also a penalty.

At the end, it didn't matter. They had two more chances to get the two-point conversion and failed on both. Gutsy call by Campbell.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27230
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #472: December 31, 2023, 10:51:03 AM »
The TV ref noted that #68 didn't line up against anyone, which was also a penalty.

At the end, it didn't matter. They had two more chances to get the two-point conversion and failed on both. Gutsy call by Campbell.
Rivera was blasted earlier in the year for not going for the win against the Eagles. 

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21718
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #473: December 31, 2023, 11:05:12 AM »
The TV ref noted that #68 didn't line up against anyone, which was also a penalty.

At the end, it didn't matter. They had two more chances to get the two-point conversion and failed on both. Gutsy call by Campbell.

That wasn’t the flag though. The ref should be fired

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 43749
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: NFL 2023-24
« Reply #474: December 31, 2023, 04:26:46 PM »
Cards win, Pats and Commies lose. 2nd pick is wide open