nice Svrluga piece:
The Nats need to be a destination, not a way station, for their own players
Harper, Rendon, Turner, Soto, Scherzer:
It would of been tough to sign Rendon and Strasburg. They chose Strasburg. Turns out should of been neither.
The Nats could of resigned Scherzer when he became of free agent but it wouldn't of made sense to beat the Mets offer. I'm sure Scherzer preferred going to a winning team anyway. So did they lose anything by trading him. A half season of meaningless baseball.
They were going to lose with or without Soto for the next couple of years. They needed to get something for him, which at this point looks like they did big time. When he becomes a free agent the Nats can go after him if it looks like they can win again. So it doesn't matter if he plays for somebody else for the next two years. The Nats will be in the same position whether they kept him or not, bidding against everybody else.
The Nats should of gotten more for Turner and Scherzer in that trade. Having said that, chances are Turner would of signed with somebody else this offseason if the Nats would of kept him and they wouldn't of won anything anyway.
Harper is a different story. When he didn't sign earlier in the offseason the Nats had to move on and sign other guys. By the time Harper appealed straight to the owner the Nats had already spent the money. But, I believe if the Nats had made an offer with less deferred money Harper would of signed with the Nats. So that one is on the Nats.