I'm actually wondering about the other side of the coin. How does Boras ethically represent so many players on the same team or in the same free agent class, who are fighting over the same pot of money?
For example, there's a reasonable guess that the money for a Soto extension wasn't there because of money owed to Strasburg (and Scherzer, deferred); Correa got a worse contract because teams (well, team) had already paid guys like Seager and Semien; and so on. For lawyers, those conflicts would likely be non-consentable, so it sorta astounds me that players put up with them.