Author Topic: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle  (Read 72578 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Count Walewski

  • Posts: 2907
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #750 on: April 04, 2026, 09:45:48 pm »
Glad to see CJ showing off for the Dodgers. Hopefully they're impressed and willing to offer prospects.

Offline SkinsNatFan21RIP

  • Posts: 1635
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #751 on: April 05, 2026, 10:07:14 am »
Glad to see CJ showing off for the Dodgers. Hopefully they're impressed and willing to offer prospects.

Yeah, god knows we can’t pay our own talent…

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 50444
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #752 on: April 06, 2026, 10:46:15 am »
Nice article on the incorporation of data into game prep and development that starts out  with a discussion of some of CJ's new pregame "homework":
Quote
On Wednesday afternoon, before the Nationals’ series finale against the Phillies, CJ Abrams and Luis García Jr. sat like two schoolkids in their chairs, using their lockers as makeshift desks. With paper and pen in hand, the duo leaned over and wrote on a sheet, occasionally turning to each other for help.

Before each game, the Nationals’ hitters have homework. They each fill out a sheet of paper titled “Go Zones,” which contains two rows of five miniature strike zones. Each zone has a specific area highlighted in green with the word “GO.” Each hitter checks the areas he’s looking to swing at. There’s space at the bottom of the paper for players to leave notes. Then they talk as a group through their game plan.

“It’s a mental thing,” Abrams said. “It starts in practice. Whenever you’re taking BP, whatever your go zone is, just stay there. And, if it’s thrown somewhere else, take it. … And then in the game you just got to go out there and hit, stay disciplined.”
https://www.thebanner.com/sports/nationals-mlb/washington-nationals-home-opener-team-reuild-ZPYD6GTOOJB4BMLW3CKHDADEJI/

Rest of the article deals with more examples of the incorporation of data into pregame prep and development on the MLB team and other parts of the organization. Good read.

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7805
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #753 on: April 14, 2026, 07:57:57 pm »
Really hope there’s a way he stays in DC long term.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 51698
  • Rebuilding since 2022...
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #754 on: April 14, 2026, 08:52:21 pm »
problem is we've got something like 7 shortstops in our system, including 5 in our top-10.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 50444
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #755 on: April 14, 2026, 09:00:31 pm »
MLBTR chat with Steve Adams:
Quote
Sec. 315

    Has CJ Abrams’ hot start upped his value to the point where middle infielder needy teams may be ready to bite the bullet on Taboni’s trade ask?  Thoughts on possible suitors?

Steve Adams

    Nothing thus far has really changed my view of him. I touted him as a high-end trade piece all winter and think he was and still is just that. He’s had huge three-month performances to start each of the past two seasons before collapsing. The challenge is getting him to maintain and also finding a new defensive home.Abrams is hitting the ball harder and walking more, if you’re looking for positive indicators, but 60 PAs isn’t enough for me to read much into either, especially when he’s chasing a bit more and his overall contact rate is down considerably.
    I think Abrams should command a very strong return if the Nats move him this summer — multiple top prospects — and he should hold interest to a pretty wide swath of teams. He’d be better suited at 2B or in the OF than shortstop. A team like the Pirates could try him at 3B.Pittsburgh, Toronto, Kansas City, Detroit, Boston … I can see plenty of clubs having real interest.
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2026/04/mlbtr-live-chat-120.html

Offline SkinsNatFan21RIP

  • Posts: 1635
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #756 on: April 14, 2026, 10:29:55 pm »
MLBTR chat with Steve Adams:https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2026/04/mlbtr-live-chat-120.html

Nats fans favorite pastime. Drooling over other team’s prospects that we’ll never see long enough to care about before they’re traded. Yay.

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7805
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #757 on: April 15, 2026, 07:12:35 am »
problem is we've got something like 7 shortstops in our system, including 5 in our top-10.
I don’t really see that as a problem. Willits is really the only true SS in this org, including Abrams, and likely won’t be ready for another three years. If Abrams gets SS money before having to move positions I doubt he would really care about a switch to 2B/LF/CF. 

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 69424
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #758 on: April 15, 2026, 07:43:09 am »
I don’t really see that as a problem. Willits is really the only true SS in this org, including Abrams, and likely won’t be ready for another three years. If Abrams gets SS money before having to move positions I doubt he would really care about a switch to 2B/LF/CF. 
For real. Not signing Abrams to an extension because you think the guy with the .589 OPSin Low A ball is not a real reason. Does anyone think Ketel Marte is overpaid? If Abrams can sustain something similar to this, then we don't care about where he plays. He can DH and he'd be worth it.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 13050
  • Sunshine Squad 2026
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #759 on: April 15, 2026, 11:41:21 am »
Good gamble by Toboni keeping Abrams

Fingers crossed he doesn’t turn into a pumpkin (again) before the deadline

Online welch

  • Posts: 19238
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #760 on: April 15, 2026, 01:12:06 pm »
Why trade CJ for prospects? Why not try to extend him...although that has not been the Nats way since Ted Lerner died.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 69424
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #761 on: April 15, 2026, 02:31:17 pm »
Why trade CJ for prospects? Why not try to extend him...although that has not been the Nats way since Ted Lerner died.
Because the Leners are cheap and Toboni wasn't brought in here to sign long term deals.

Online zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8261
  • The one true ace
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #762 on: April 15, 2026, 03:05:58 pm »
we'll get a good haul if we trade him. Need to get a stud pitching prospect in return

Online welch

  • Posts: 19238
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #763 on: April 15, 2026, 03:10:44 pm »
Because the Leners are cheap and Toboni wasn't brought in here to sign long term deals.

I understand. If only Ted Lerner had kids who respected his way of running the Nats. Or if the Nats had MLB-typical owners. DC is a good market, that was the lesson of Calvin Griffith. In 1960, the Nats played first division baseball until they shut down a couple players at the end of the season. Attendance jumped by 150,000, and would have broken 1 million in a ballpark with more than 25,000 seats, and many seats far out in the bleachers orblocked by the steel that held up the second deck. That's what Shirley Povich wrote.

Had Calvin stayed for the spiffy new DC Stadium, with a respectable team, he would have drawn big numbers. Would have owned DC with the team that won the pennant in 1965. Bigger than the Redskins became after the expansion Nats took off to Texas.

All it takes is putting a respectable team on the field. In the Ted Lerner days, the Nats would have picked up a couple pitchers around the trade deadline. Now?

Offline IanRubbish

  • Posts: 4451
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #764 on: April 16, 2026, 12:15:30 am »
Why trade CJ for prospects? Why not try to extend him...although that has not been the Nats way since Ted Lerner died.

Why not tip the waiter 20%?  Same answer as to why this club's fine ownership will ensure CJ is a Phillie or Ranger in the not too distant future.

Offline IanRubbish

  • Posts: 4451
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #765 on: April 16, 2026, 12:26:36 am »
I understand. If only Ted Lerner had kids who respected his way of running the Nats. Or if the Nats had MLB-typical owners. DC is a good market, that was the lesson of Calvin Griffith. In 1960, the Nats played first division baseball until they shut down a couple players at the end of the season. Attendance jumped by 150,000, and would have broken 1 million in a ballpark with more than 25,000 seats, and many seats far out in the bleachers orblocked by the steel that held up the second deck. That's what Shirley Povich wrote.

The Senators move to Minnesota was before my time, but was motivated by awful, racist ideals.  Griffith was a nut in a dog turd.  If MLB wants to keep profiting off of Jackie Robinson's legacy, it needs to acknowledge its eff up with that move.  I don't think much of current ownership, but I don't think they have a racist bone in their bodies.  They've shown equal treatment of White players, Black players, Latin or Asian players, and the guy in the Screech costume when it comes to not wanting to pay anyone for anything.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 13050
  • Sunshine Squad 2026
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #766 on: April 16, 2026, 05:08:53 am »
Why trade CJ for prospects? Why not try to extend him...although that has not been the Nats way since Ted Lerner died.
Rest of the roster is trash. Positive start unsustainable imo. Move CJ Abrams for a :az: package before he turns into a pumpkin (again).

2027 will be a labor hell year.

All in for .500 in 2028 :koolaid:

Online welch

  • Posts: 19238
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #767 on: April 16, 2026, 05:33:55 pm »
The Senators move to Minnesota was before my time, but was motivated by awful, racist ideals.  Griffith was a nut in a dog turd.  If MLB wants to keep profiting off of Jackie Robinson's legacy, it needs to acknowledge its eff up with that move.  I don't think much of current ownership, but I don't think they have a racist bone in their bodies.  They've shown equal treatment of White players, Black players, Latin or Asian players, and the guy in the Screech costume when it comes to not wanting to pay anyone for anything.

I sufferted through that move, and hated the expansion team. The "Old Senators", as we called them, had an all-around solid team, and more good players on the way through the minors. We knew that "city fathers" in Minneapolis-St Paul had promised Calvin Griffith 40,000 season tickets. We didn't know, until later, that Calvin had told the"city fathers" that "when I saw only white faces" at a Rotary Club (or similar) meeting "I knew this was the place for my team". That's when Rod Carew said "Im not working on that man's plantation any more". Tom Boswell wrote, a few years ago, that he had met Calvin Griffith in the late '70s, and found Calvin a disgusting racist who deserved to be out of baseball.

Calvin, a guy we disliked even before he moved our team, would have made a fortune in Washington with that good 1960s team. In 1971, Crazy George Allen announced, for no reason that we could see, that the Redskins would go to the playoffs to makeup for MLB's having insulted the Capital. The Skins had not been that good since about 1945, so nobody believed him. Then the 1971 Skins went to the playoffs at the wild-card team, and the Redskins owned The District. Could have been Calvin, racist dog or not.

Put a good team in DC and fans will make money for the Lerners. Scrimp on the team, win 60 games, and fans will find something else to do.

And another thing. Washington is no more transient than anyplace else. Congressmen come and go, but there is a soiid care of Washingtonians who work for the Federal government. The GS-whatever folks are protected by Civil Service laws. They stay. Since about 1960, many companies grew up to add services to the government. My old company, GE Information Service, re-located from Phoenix, AZ, to Rockville about 1970 because the boss found that there were more computer people in the Washington area than anyplace else.

Together, that made Washington more stable and wealthy after about 1960. The area is recession-proof.

Maybe, JCA, this leads to another thread, to be called something like "Washington is a great market for a baseball team, and the Lerners just need to give us a respectable team". Ted Lerner knew that, along with having a true Washingtonians appreciation of Washington baseball. The Lerner kids are leaving money on the table.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 50444
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #768 on: April 17, 2026, 06:00:24 pm »
https://www.thebanner.com/sports/nationals-mlb/nationals-cj-abrams-hot-hitting-JWVB37H55FEVDB6R4GXE4MK2H4/

Golden's article starts out with discussing how CJ practices selectivity during BP by only swinging at heart of the plate pitches. [Note: for Banner articles, you may want to navigate to  www.thebanner.com/sports/nationals-mlb/ then select the article if the link above doesn't work.

Quote
Abrams leads the league in batting run value, a stat that measures runs created by a hitter, with 16, five more than the next-closest player. And, on pitches over the heart of the plate, Abrams has a run value of 10, the best mark among qualified major league hitters. Last season, Abrams had a run value of minus-14 on those pitches.

“Just locking on the heart of the zone so when they throw it there you’re not kind of surprised,” Abrams said. “Before, I would kind of just swing, trying to hit balls hard wherever it’s pitched. But now I’m trying to shrink the zone.”

Noting CJ often has hot Aprils, Golden notes even by that  standard he's further up the league leader lists so far.

There's an interesting discussion of swing mechanics he worked on this offseason in Atlanta so that he's more balanced when his front foot lands and that he's holding the bat more vertical in his stance, which helps limit fouling pitches off.

Quote
In some senses, Abrams’ propensity to mash pitches over the heart of the plate comes by necessity. Granted, the sample is small, but Abrams is seeing fewer pitches in the strike zone this season (43.1%) than any previous year. As a result, he’s swinging less than he ever has (47.8%), especially on the first pitch (30.3%).

And, when he gets the optimal pitch to hit, he’s connecting. Meatball percentage is a stat on Baseball Savant that quantifies the percentage of pitches a hitter sees belt high. Abrams has only seen those in 4.7% of his at-bats; league average is 7.4%. He’s swung at 92.3% of those pitches.

Online zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8261
  • The one true ace
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #769 on: April 17, 2026, 06:24:57 pm »
Realistically what does he get in a trade?

I'd imagine we'd target pitching. Teams that come to mind that could be interested in Abrams and have good pitching prospects:

1. Boston: They have 4 top 100 pitching prospects in Tolle, Early, Witherspoon, and Valera. Eyanson and Phillips are both interesting as well. Early isn't getting traded as he is a good piece in their current rotation. Other pieces they have that I like: Justin Gonzales (19 at A+) and Dorian Soto (SS in the DSL last year)

2. Pittsburgh: 2 top 100 pitching prospects in Hernandez and Barco. Interesting hitter in Edward Florentino and they have a comp pick (#36 I believe?) as well. They should be really motivated to compete while they have Skenes and before he demandsa trade or gets pissy being there. Abrams would be a big help for that, plus he's cost-controlled for 2.5 years which fits their M.O.

3. Yankees: 2 top hundred pitchers in Lagrange and Rodriguez plus to others I like that are probably in the next 50 or so in Hess and Cunningham. Lombard jr. and Kilby are both interesting guys as well.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 19037
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #770 on: April 17, 2026, 06:36:49 pm »
Daniel Murphy preaching his A swing philosophy

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7805
Re: CJ Abrams: Our new man in the middle
« Reply #771 on: April 17, 2026, 08:09:26 pm »
https://www.thebanner.com/sports/nationals-mlb/nationals-cj-abrams-hot-hitting-JWVB37H55FEVDB6R4GXE4MK2H4/

Golden's article starts out with discussing how CJ practices selectivity during BP by only swinging at heart of the plate pitches. [Note: for Banner articles, you may want to navigate to  www.thebanner.com/sports/nationals-mlb/ then select the article if the link above doesn't work.

Noting CJ often has hot Aprils, Golden notes even by that  standard he's further up the league leader lists so far.

There's an interesting discussion of swing mechanics he worked on this offseason in Atlanta so that he's more balanced when his front foot lands and that he's holding the bat more vertical in his stance, which helps limit fouling pitches off.

Most interesting part of this article to me was that they approached him with an extension offer in 2024.