Author Topic: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)  (Read 11425 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21606
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #525: January 01, 2023, 04:22:23 PM »
I’d like to see Howell get some snaps next week. They might as well give him a chance

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22277
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #526: January 01, 2023, 04:33:49 PM »
They aren't mathematically eliminated, so I doubt we will.  I'd like to see him too.

The Packers seem to be eliminating them as we speak.

I’d like to see Howell get some snaps next week. They might as well give him a chance

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42511
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #527: January 01, 2023, 05:08:06 PM »
Ders laid a major tuddy on the field today.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11498
  • Sunshine Squad 2022
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #528: January 01, 2023, 07:54:30 PM »
I’d like to see Howell get some snaps next week. They might as well give him a chance
Im angry. But unless they change owners in next few weeks, they shouldn’t change GM and coach this offseason. New owner deserves that choice.

Go into next season with Heinicke as starter with either Howell or a draft pick as backup. Don’t tie new owner’s hands.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 25682
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #529: January 01, 2023, 08:00:34 PM »
Rivera is not going anywhere. Snyder would even get more flack if he fired him. They should just roll with Heinicke and Howell next year.  Wentz is like a cancer you need to cut out and hope it didn’t spread too much.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 25682
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #530: January 01, 2023, 08:01:05 PM »
They aren't mathematically eliminated, so I doubt we will.  I'd like to see him too.

The Packers seem to be eliminating them as we speak.
Everything I am reading says they have been eliminated.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21606
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #531: January 01, 2023, 08:02:33 PM »
Everything I am reading says they have been eliminated.

The packers winning eliminated them (nice the see Cousins screwing Dan again). I have some vague hope that the team will be sold this off-season and the new owner will be able to clean house

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 25682
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #532: January 01, 2023, 08:09:14 PM »
I have some vague hope that the team will be sold this off-season and the new owner will be able to clean house

Sounds like a familiar theme around town. 

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21606
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #533: January 01, 2023, 08:15:59 PM »
Sounds like a familiar theme around town. 

Is there any city that has owners as bad as DC across multiple sports?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63096
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #534: January 01, 2023, 08:25:06 PM »
Is there any city that has owners as bad as DC across multiple sports?
Oakland

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21606

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11498
  • Sunshine Squad 2022
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #536: January 01, 2023, 08:47:23 PM »
Is there any city that has owners as bad as DC across multiple sports?
Arizona?

Offline 1995hoo

  • Posts: 1082
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #537: January 01, 2023, 10:29:01 PM »
Evidently, someone who works for the Commanders must be familiar with the quotation in my autosignature. The following is a screenshot from an article on their website about the Hogs.


Offline imref

  • Posts: 42511
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #538: January 02, 2023, 12:01:01 AM »
And while the ders went with Wentz, so many other teams seem to be able to find QBs pretty easily. 

Online welch

  • Posts: 16289
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #539: January 02, 2023, 04:50:40 PM »
Doesn't this thread about the Deadskins belong in Uncensored?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42511
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #540: January 04, 2023, 01:19:19 PM »
Rivera says Sam Howell is starting at QB on Sunday.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11498
  • Sunshine Squad 2022
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #541: January 09, 2023, 12:10:33 AM »
Season deserved better than 8-8-1.

If new ownership is in place by Feb or March, make Aaron Rodgers say no.

If offseason ownership change is slow, bring back Heinicke and Howell. New ownership deserves to make the big swing on new QB. They shouldn’t inherit a huge investment they didn’t make.

Online GataNats

  • Posts: 1162
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #542: January 09, 2023, 12:27:27 AM »
Season deserved better than 8-8-1.

If new ownership is in place by Feb or March, make Aaron Rodgers say no.

If offseason ownership change is slow, bring back Heinicke and Howell. New ownership deserves to make the big swing on new QB. They shouldn’t inherit a huge investment they didn’t make.

Rogers is totally washed, and is a locker room cancer.  Give me Carr any day of the week

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21606
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #543: January 09, 2023, 08:15:33 AM »
Season deserved better than 8-8-1.

If new ownership is in place by Feb or March, make Aaron Rodgers say no.

If offseason ownership change is slow, bring back Heinicke and Howell. New ownership deserves to make the big swing on new QB. They shouldn’t inherit a huge investment they didn’t make.

No qb, terrible front office, a head coach coaching decades in the past, a run first OC in a past first league- they’re lucky to be .500

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63096
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #544: January 09, 2023, 08:19:54 AM »
Unless a sale goes through quickly after the Super Bowl, I dont see any major moves being done. A new owner is going to want a new GM, who, in turn, will want the opportunity to select their head coach and franchise QB

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #545: January 09, 2023, 09:13:55 AM »
Season deserved better than 8-8-1.

If new ownership is in place by Feb or March, make Aaron Rodgers say no.



Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22277
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #546: January 09, 2023, 09:23:56 AM »
I would gladly trade quick moves if that process takes effect. I'd trade off several seasons for a new owner that is willing to follow the standard NFL football franchise process.

Unless a sale goes through quickly after the Super Bowl, I dont see any major moves being done. A new owner is going to want a new GM, who, in turn, will want the opportunity to select their head coach and franchise QB

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21606
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #547: January 09, 2023, 09:46:22 AM »
I would gladly trade quick moves if that process takes effect. I'd trade off several seasons for a new owner that is willing to follow the standard NFL football franchise process.


The standard process is to start mediocre and occasionally jump to decent. The teams that get and stay good are the exception to the rule. It usually requires great QBs and great coaches. We've run off great coaches and haven't sniffed a great QB since Sunny 

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 25682
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #548: January 09, 2023, 09:55:15 AM »
The standard process is to start mediocre and occasionally jump to decent. The teams that get and stay good are the exception to the rule. It usually requires great QBs and great coaches. We've run off great coaches and haven't sniffed a great QB since Sunny
Not sure what you mean by stay successful. Patriots had a great run but now headed downhill. I guess the Steelers but not always a Super Bowl contender. What other franchises have been continually successful over the past 25 years? Can’t think of any in the NFC. They all have down years. Getting a QB is important but SF shows you can build a good team without a star there.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21606
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #549: January 09, 2023, 10:44:15 AM »
Not sure what you mean by stay successful. Patriots had a great run but now headed downhill. I guess the Steelers but not always a Super Bowl contender. What other franchises have been continually successful over the past 25 years? Can’t think of any in the NFC. They all have down years. Getting a QB is important but SF shows you can build a good team without a star there.

By stay successful, I mean at least five years of making the playoffs with a Super Bowl appearance or win. SF has a star coach, one who Snyder ran out of the building. For everyone who talks about process and doing things the right way, you can do the right thing and still be terrible. You can also be a terrible organization and luck into Joe Burrow.