Author Topic: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)  (Read 12181 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #500: December 24, 2022, 11:52:52 AM »
If Bezos were to buy, then I could see him wanting space close in, to complement HQ2. 

They don't seem to have broken ground on the double helix // poop emoji building, but that site could barely hold the footprint of the stadium and would have no parking.  It also has 3 high-end apartment towers across the street (12th and Eads), so unless they could cut a deal to use Pentagon parking on Sundays (unlikely), I just don't see that as a site.  Not enough space in Potomac Yards left, either.  That only leaves RFK, which is under Congressional control.  I don't think McCarthy and Schumer would be able to push through any legislation to transfer the land to DC to allow for a new lease given animosity among some to Amazon.  That I guess puts far out suburbs still as the likely location, which would detract from the HQ2 synergy. 

I think there is zero chance that Arlington or Alexandria oks an NFL stadium. I wonder if the Post printing facility off the beltway has a large enough footprint, if not there, then the industrial area near the St James in Springfield seems ripe for redevelopment. I doubt Fairfax would ok either site though

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39972
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #501: December 24, 2022, 11:57:17 AM »
I think there is zero chance that Arlington or Alexandria oks an NFL stadium. I wonder if the Post printing facility off the beltway has a large enough footprint, if not there, then the industrial area near the St James in Springfield seems ripe for redevelopment. I doubt Fairfax would ok either site though
isn't the Springfield area site the VA site the FBI HQ?  There's supposed to be another government facility there that poses issues that I guess have been overcome for the FBI, but I wonder if the same would be true for a football stadium.

Online imref

  • Posts: 43117
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #502: December 24, 2022, 12:51:35 PM »
Jay Glazer reporting that the 'ders are ready to go back to Wentz if Heinickie struggles today.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22292
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #504: December 24, 2022, 02:02:01 PM »
Jay Glazer reporting that the 'ders are ready to go back to Wentz if Heinickie struggles today.

That’ll totally jump start the offense.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #505: December 24, 2022, 04:48:43 PM »
Awesome display of ineptitude by turner

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26027
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #506: December 24, 2022, 06:45:22 PM »
Who is Turner?


Online machpost

  • Posts: 653
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #508: December 27, 2022, 09:14:40 AM »
Regarding the lack of a stadium, is there any chance that someone swoops in to buy the franchise only to move it to another city?

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #509: December 27, 2022, 09:44:44 AM »
The NFL owners have to vote on relocation. Moving anywhere would cost a half billion in fees on top of the $8 billion and that's assuming the owners say yes

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #510: December 27, 2022, 10:37:05 AM »
Why would an owner move from this market?

Online machpost

  • Posts: 653
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #511: December 27, 2022, 10:39:24 AM »
Why would an owner move from this market?
Because they can? Because they want to? Purely hypothetical.

Offline HondoKillebrew

  • Posts: 848
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #512: December 27, 2022, 02:23:10 PM »
Because they can? Because they want to? Purely hypothetical.

There is no market that would be better. The reason the bidding is reportedly so high is the potential to return the team to at least some of its previous popularity given the market.

Online welch

  • Posts: 16450
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #513: December 28, 2022, 05:20:57 PM »
Regarding the lack of a stadium, is there any chance that someone swoops in to buy the franchise only to move it to another city?

No.


Online imref

  • Posts: 43117
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #514: January 01, 2023, 01:53:30 PM »
Wentz picking up where he left off.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #515: January 01, 2023, 01:55:20 PM »
The only thing they have going for them is how terrible Watson is

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11555
  • Sunshine Squad 2024
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #516: January 01, 2023, 03:07:45 PM »
Going with Wentz today is super hot seat worthy.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #517: January 01, 2023, 03:10:51 PM »
I was worried about my commanders season under bet going into today, but wentz is helping

Offline 1995hoo

  • Posts: 1085
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #518: January 01, 2023, 03:18:01 PM »
Apparently the Commies introduced a new pig mascot named "Major Tuddy" (whatever that means). Lots of "Major Turdy" jokes circulating already.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11555
  • Sunshine Squad 2024
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #519: January 01, 2023, 03:24:27 PM »
Fire all these people.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #520: January 01, 2023, 03:58:30 PM »
Fitting that their mascot also enjoys wallowing in crap

Online imref

  • Posts: 43117
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #521: January 01, 2023, 04:02:24 PM »
Fitting that their mascot also enjoys wallowing in crap

First candidate for the 2023 POTY award.

Online imref

  • Posts: 43117
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #522: January 01, 2023, 04:02:49 PM »
Apparently the Commies introduced a new pig mascot named "Major Tuddy" (whatever that means). Lots of "Major Turdy" jokes circulating already.

Tuddy apparently means "touchdown" or so they said on the broadcast.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11555
  • Sunshine Squad 2024
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #523: January 01, 2023, 04:10:21 PM »
He hung his tenure on Wentz. It didn’t work. Rivera shouldn’t pick the next QB. Ownership change probably saves him.

Draft a guy and hold onto Heinicke. Don’t force a veteran addition onto a possible new coach in 2024.

Online imref

  • Posts: 43117
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Commanders? Really? Thread (2022)
« Reply #524: January 01, 2023, 04:21:47 PM »
in the post game press conference Rivera expressed surprise when a reporter asked him about QB plans for next week if they are eliminated with a Packers win this afternoon. He didn't seem to realize the team faced elimination.