Author Topic: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5  (Read 297 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online bluestreak

  • Posts: 10995
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #75: September 06, 2021, 04:32:14 PM »
At home plate , I thought a safe call indicated the player had touched home. I’ve seen the umpire hold off on any call until the guy touches home. Shouldn’t be reviewable.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 14278
  • 2019: Won the fight
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #76: September 06, 2021, 04:32:52 PM »

..."a crushing loss for the Mets...to the downtrodden Nationals". Key, we saw on replay: Nats had Stevenson stealing 2B so there was no chance that grounder could have become a double play. Lets go Nats!!!

Offline OldChelsea

  • Posts: 8106
  • Nats Supporter in Exile
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #77: September 06, 2021, 04:34:05 PM »
THE RACING PRECEDENTS: Comparative dates on which the Nationals notched their 57th win, each season:

2017 - 18th July (93rd match of season)
2016 - 20th July (95th match)
2012 - 24th July (96th match)
2014 - 27th July (102nd match)
2019- 29th July (106th match)
2005 - 3rd August (107th match)
2018 - 5th August (111th match)
2015 - 8th August (109th match)
2013 - 11th August (117th match)
2011 - 12th August (118th match)
2007 - 21st August (126th match)
2010 - 30th August (132nd match)
2006 - 2nd September (134th match)
2021 - 6th September (137th match)
2008 - 15th September (150th match)
2009 - 2nd October (160th match)
---
2020 - finished 26-34

Offline sixthree175

  • Posts: 2208
  • Born in 1961
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #78: September 06, 2021, 04:34:11 PM »
That was a gift.  :w:
No, it was well earned

Offline sixthree175

  • Posts: 2208
  • Born in 1961
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #79: September 06, 2021, 04:34:54 PM »
At home plate , I thought a safe call indicated the player had touched home. I’ve seen the umpire hold off on any call until the guy touches home. Shouldn’t be reviewable.
Agreed.  I don't know what the rule is -- but it shouldn't be reviewable

Offline welch

  • Posts: 14278
  • 2019: Won the fight
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #80: September 06, 2021, 04:35:59 PM »
Had em all the way!

Where is Mitlen in the summer of our discontent?

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 20683
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #81: September 06, 2021, 04:56:24 PM »
Can’t have happened.  Most WNFF posters said Kieboom was Kiebust. 

Offline imref

  • Posts: 35921
  • Re-contending in 2022
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #82: September 06, 2021, 05:03:15 PM »
Can’t have happened.  Most WNFF posters said Kieboom was Kiebust. 

Really nice to see his turnaround.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29199
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #83: September 06, 2021, 05:42:18 PM »
Can’t have happened.  Most WNFF posters said Kieboom was Kiebust.

It may look like a line drive in the box score, but was a dribbler to short that would have resulted in a Zim Special under ordinary circumstances...

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29199
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #84: September 06, 2021, 05:52:36 PM »
I'll take the sure loss in a Corbin start in my attempt to boost my friend bs in the standings before seasons end...1:05 start time...

EDIT:

I'll cherry pick the sure :w: in a Corbin start in my attempt to bury my friend bs in the standings before seasons end...1:05 start time...  :whistle:

Offline welch

  • Posts: 14278
  • 2019: Won the fight
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #85: September 06, 2021, 08:01:02 PM »
It may look like a line drive in the box score, but was a dribbler to short that would have resulted in a Zim Special under ordinary circumstances...

Davey had Stevenson running to steal 2B, which meant there was no chance of a double play. Then the fielder might have blundered the ball because he was changing his mind to throw home.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 20683
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #86: September 06, 2021, 08:20:26 PM »
It may look like a line drive in the box score, but was a dribbler to short that would have resulted in a Zim Special under ordinary circumstances...
Yea but almost no one here wanted him back and he has been hitting OK since he came back up. 

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29199
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #87: September 06, 2021, 08:25:30 PM »
Davey had Stevenson running to steal 2B, which meant there was no chance of a double play. Then the fielder might have blundered the ball because he was changing his mind to throw home.

Yes indeed...Stevie was almost standing on the bag by the time Lindor fumbled the grounder...

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29199
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #88: September 06, 2021, 08:31:51 PM »
Yea but almost no one here wanted him back and he has been hitting OK since he came back up.

He's back because we have nobody else...like Robust before The Lane Train arrived.  Unlike Robust, he has no D game...

We can do better...not sure we will though...they anointed him the starting 3rd baseman in pre-Covid Spring Training...

I wish him well, but I'm not optimistic...

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 20683
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 5
« Reply #89: September 06, 2021, 08:41:54 PM »
He's back because we have nobody else...like Robust before The Lane Train arrived.  Unlike Robust, he has no D game...

We can do better...not sure we will though...they anointed him the starting 3rd baseman in pre-Covid Spring Training...

I wish him well, but I'm not optimistic...
Deja vu all over again.  Welcome to the 2008 Washington Nationals.