Author Topic: Extend Bell  (Read 940 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 20683
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #75: September 09, 2021, 07:35:24 PM »
I'm a bit confused by some of the discussion here about some first base comps.

For 2021, wRC+:

Freeman: 133
Goldschmidt: 127
Rizzo:  114
Bell:  112.

I mean you can't just drop someone's first month from their stats because it was not good.  Freeman would probably be at 150.  I can't see Bell with 112 being close to Freeman or Goldschmidt.  Also, all three of the other guys listed I believe are considered better defensively than Bell.  Goldschmidt leads 1B this year in Defensive Runs Saved. 

Bell has had wild up and down swings with his offense the past few years so let's see how he does the rest of this year and beginning of next before offering him a pricey extension.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 58858
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #76: September 09, 2021, 07:51:51 PM »
You can drop it when he had covid.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 20683
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #77: September 09, 2021, 07:57:41 PM »
You can drop it when he had covid.
There was no indication that he had any sort of serious issues.  Freddie Freeman did in 2020 and then won the MVP.

More Fangraphs numbers.  Total WAR.

Freeman. 3,7 (4th in MLB for 1B)
Goldschmidt  3.6 (5th in MLB)
Hoskins who someone else mentioned and who is a butcher at 1B and who missed lots of time this year.  2.4
Rizzo 1.4
Bell 0.7.

Are you seriously going to tell me that Bell is going to get $20 million a year with that type of WAR? 

Offline greven

  • Posts: 113
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #78: September 09, 2021, 08:38:38 PM »

You aren't evaluating things in the right context here. When you pick comps, you pick a comp to what the player got when they got Free Agency and not what they did AFTER the contract was awarded. MAT's agents would be stupid to think MAT is going to get Heywatd money because at the time that Heywatd became a free agent, he was 26 (27?) and had some good years at the plate.


I'm not sure if Bell is going to get 100M, but comparing him to when Goldschmidt got his contract is also misleading. Goldschmidt was quite a bit better before signing the deal, same as Heyward.
That was actually exactly my argument if you look at the thread history.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 58858
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #79: September 09, 2021, 09:03:20 PM »
There was no indication that he had any sort of serious issues.  Freddie Freeman did in 2020 and then won the MVP.

More Fangraphs numbers.  Total WAR.

Freeman. 3,7 (4th in MLB for 1B)
Goldschmidt  3.6 (5th in MLB)
Hoskins who someone else mentioned and who is a butcher at 1B and who missed lots of time this year.  2.4
Rizzo 1.4
Bell 0.7.

Are you seriously going to tell me that Bell is going to get $20 million a year with that type of WAR? 

Theres nothing to support he didnt have a serious issue. And even non-serious bouts of covid have lingering issues after. Almost 5 months of performance outweighs the first three weeks coming off covid

Offline Mattionals

  • Posts: 5038
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #80: September 09, 2021, 09:16:02 PM »
That was actually exactly my argument if you look at the thread history.


You suggested 4 years at 10M a year. I think he will get more than that as an .800 OPS 1B with lousy defense. I think Slate is wrong that Goldschmidt is what Boras will use as a comp, because of he did, Boras is a moron.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 20683
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #81: September 09, 2021, 09:30:45 PM »
Theres nothing to support he didnt have a serious issue. And even non-serious bouts of covid have lingering issues after. Almost 5 months of performance outweighs the first three weeks coming off covid
Did he have COVID in 2020?  Because his stats were real bad then also.  He's an up and down guy.  Just accept it. 

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 29199
  • King of Goodness
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #82: September 09, 2021, 09:33:16 PM »
Did he have COVID in 2020?  Because his stats were real bad then also.  He's an up and down guy.  Just accept it.

If Bell gets 5 years, $100MM...it won't be the Nats that give it to him...

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 58858
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #83: September 09, 2021, 09:53:08 PM »
Did he have COVID in 2020?  Because his stats were real bad then also.  He's an up and down guy.  Just accept it. 
I toss all of 2020 out the window.

He hasnt been up and down this season at all. He puts another season like this one together next season, he's gonna get a big deal.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 58858
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #84: Yesterday at 08:52:49 AM »
Stayed hot in September. This is actually his best month of the year so far, putting up a 151 wRC+.

 Thats four months in a row with over a 120 wRC+. Why do we care about this? Because the knock on Bell has always been consistency. Even in his 2019, breakout year, he had a monster first half (really the first two months) and then only had one month of good performance after). Here, with Long and a supporting cast (or maybe just not being the ONLY good hitter), he has found consistency at the plate.

From May 9th (a full month after covid return), he's posted a .281/.365/.515 slash line (132 wRC+). I feel pretty comfortable in saying that if he doesnt get covid, his April is not nearly as atrocious as it was and he's sitting at a whole season of ~125 wRC+. Thats essentially what Pete Alonso has been this season.

He got 6.3 in arbitration last season. He has one more year of arbitration, where I would guess he gets about 9.5 million. 9.5 million is a steal for a first baseman who can put up 130 wRC+( or 30 homer/high 800s OPS or better). Ideally, I'd like a 3 year deal that ends when Soto hits free agency, but I imagine Bell will want at least one more year. So 3 years, 55 million, or 4 years, 70 million would fit nicely

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 32927
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #85: Yesterday at 06:07:09 PM »
Stayed hot in September. This is actually his best month of the year so far, putting up a 151 wRC+.

 Thats four months in a row with over a 120 wRC+. Why do we care about this? Because the knock on Bell has always been consistency. Even in his 2019, breakout year, he had a monster first half (really the first two months) and then only had one month of good performance after). Here, with Long and a supporting cast (or maybe just not being the ONLY good hitter), he has found consistency at the plate.

From May 9th (a full month after covid return), he's posted a .281/.365/.515 slash line (132 wRC+). I feel pretty comfortable in saying that if he doesnt get covid, his April is not nearly as atrocious as it was and he's sitting at a whole season of ~125 wRC+. Thats essentially what Pete Alonso has been this season.

He got 6.3 in arbitration last season. He has one more year of arbitration, where I would guess he gets about 9.5 million. 9.5 million is a steal for a first baseman who can put up 130 wRC+( or 30 homer/high 800s OPS or better). Ideally, I'd like a 3 year deal that ends when Soto hits free agency, but I imagine Bell will want at least one more year. So 3 years, 55 million, or 4 years, 70 million would fit nicely
4 years, $70MM is the $10 he'll get next year and 3 years, $20MM AAV after that.  I know I'm the one who says there's no need to pay a lot for a first baseman, but at this point, nailing him down might make sense.  I don't like your hypothetical 3 year deal because that's like $22.5 AAC for the last 2 years, and I think there is less security but more AAV.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 20683
Re: Extend Bell
« Reply #86: Yesterday at 06:51:07 PM »
4 years, $70MM is the $10 he'll get next year and 3 years, $20MM AAV after that.  I know I'm the one who says there's no need to pay a lot for a first baseman, but at this point, nailing him down might make sense.  I don't like your hypothetical 3 year deal because that's like $22.5 AAC for the last 2 years, and I think there is less security but more AAV.
It makes some sense if you lack power at other positions such as LF and 3B.