I was replying to a comment that we shouldn’t have signed him in the first place. I’m not debating that he is awful now. I don’t think it matters whether he was “worth” a six year contract. That’s what it took to keep him from signing with the Yankees.
I can acknowledge that he sucks now but still think it was necessary to sign him. This is the price of admission for a big time free agent pitcher.
It's not whether he is worth the contract: what I was trying to say was whether the burden that contract places on the team long term is an acceptable trade off for winning one WS, as it and the owners' spending policies virtually guarantee some bad years. It was an overpay from the start, and it happens to look even worse than expected, but...trophy.
It sounds like we pretty much agree on it, though, at least the result.
Worth it to who? They are not paying him with my money.
But they're paying him with money that takes up part of a budget, meaning they won't use that budget space to get anything useful to improve the team going forward from now.