Author Topic: Michael A. Taylor - Kansas City Royal  (Read 756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 19435
Re: Michael A. Taylor - Kansas City Royal
« Reply #50: June 05, 2021, 09:25:12 AM »
Eh, the Yankees dont have anything that would recoup the value
One of their top pitching prospects.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 57446
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Michael A. Taylor - Kansas City Royal
« Reply #51: June 05, 2021, 09:30:13 AM »
One of their top pitching prospects.
Pass

Garcia is 5'9"
Schmidt has an injury history that screams reliever to me

Frankly, the Yankees prospects are always overrated.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 19435
Re: Michael A. Taylor - Kansas City Royal
« Reply #52: June 05, 2021, 09:32:04 AM »

Frankly, the Yankees prospects are always overrated.
Like Robles?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 57446
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Michael A. Taylor - Kansas City Royal
« Reply #53: June 05, 2021, 12:15:41 PM »
Like Robles?
Like putting guys in the top 75 who if they were in the Dbacks system,  wouldnt have made the top 100.

Robles hasnt developed, but he was scouted by many orgs as having elite capabilities. Most still think he can improve and he's already shown that he can be an elite defender. I dont think of him as overrated as much as taking longet to develop.

Garcia is 5'9" has a good curveball, meh control, and a low 90s, flat fastball. Im just really suspicious of a small, short pitcher being able to handle 30 or more starts. And tradinv Robles should net you more than a back of the rotation/middle relief pitcher.

Im fine of those are part of the package, but if theyre the main piece, its a waste of time

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 28447
  • King of Goodness
Re: Michael A. Taylor - Kansas City Royal
« Reply #54: June 05, 2021, 12:48:27 PM »

Im fine of those are part of the package, but if theyre the main piece, its a waste of time

So, it would seem, it would be a waste of time waiting for Robles to develop.  He may not be a bust, but he is a disappointment.  We'll non-tender him at some point...just like MAT...


Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 57446
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Michael A. Taylor - Kansas City Royal
« Reply #55: June 05, 2021, 06:30:32 PM »
So, it would seem, it would be a waste of time waiting for Robles to develop.  He may not be a bust, but he is a disappointment.  We'll non-tender him at some point...just like MAT...


What are you talking about? He hasnt finished developing yet. He's only 24.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 21895
Re: Michael A. Taylor - Kansas City Royal
« Reply #56: June 05, 2021, 08:04:40 PM »
What are you talking about? He hasnt finished developing yet. He's only 24.

If Rizzo commits to a shakeup, you're holding on to Robles? Who else?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 57446
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Michael A. Taylor - Kansas City Royal
« Reply #57: June 05, 2021, 09:52:43 PM »
If Rizzo commits to a shakeup, you're holding on to Robles? Who else?
Soto

Who else is under contract for the next three years that anyone would want?