Author Topic: NCAA Basketball 2020-21  (Read 7176 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #200: March 21, 2021, 02:02:34 PM »
Big Ten is getting exposed...

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43917
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #201: March 21, 2021, 02:09:57 PM »
first #1 falls, and I lose my first final four team.  I should have known better after watching them struggle against BYU in the conference championship.

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 16722
  • What are you dense?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #202: March 21, 2021, 02:12:21 PM »
Big Ten is getting exposed...

As what, frauds?  :mg:

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26380
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #203: March 21, 2021, 03:04:12 PM »
first #1 falls, and I lose my first final four team.  I should have known better after watching them struggle against BYU in the conference championship.
BYU?  You mean Ohio State?  I did not have Illinois in the final four but did have Ohio State.  Doh.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26380
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #204: March 21, 2021, 03:07:55 PM »
God is pleased. 

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43917
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #205: March 21, 2021, 03:26:13 PM »
I didn’t realize how good Baylor is. Wow.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43917
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #206: March 21, 2021, 03:26:56 PM »
BYU?  You mean Ohio State?  I did not have Illinois in the final four but did have Ohio State.  Doh.

You’re right. I’m thinking of BYU-Gonzaga.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26380
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #207: March 21, 2021, 04:01:49 PM »
My parlay bet for tonight.

Florida -9 and Houston -7 and 1/2.


Offline imref

  • Posts: 43917
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #208: March 21, 2021, 07:34:49 PM »
‘Cuse!!

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43917
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #209: March 21, 2021, 09:22:49 PM »
Rutgers came close. Great finish.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26380
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #210: March 21, 2021, 09:24:53 PM »
My parlay bet for tonight.

Florida -9 and Houston -7 and 1/2.
Looks like I will lose both.  I guess that's the way to go down. 

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43917
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #211: March 21, 2021, 09:48:45 PM »
Oral freaking Roberts. What a tournament.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43917
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #212: March 21, 2021, 10:36:32 PM »
Oklahoma State getting whipped early. Cunningham looks way overrated in what I’ve seen from him in this tournament. He just had a three blocked.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43917
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #213: March 22, 2021, 12:27:37 AM »
Oregon St advances. Oklahoma State just couldn’t shoot. Amazing that Oregon St was picked to finish last in their conference.

Offline Mathguy

  • Posts: 9162
  • Floyd - Truely Man's best Friend
    • Outer Banks Beach House
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #214: March 22, 2021, 06:17:24 AM »
That was an awful finish.  Rutgers couldn't hit anything - even 2 foot layups

Rutgers came close. Great finish.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26380
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #215: March 22, 2021, 08:03:34 AM »
Oregon St advances. Oklahoma State just couldn’t shoot. Amazing that Oregon St was picked to finish last in their conference.
There goes my bracket.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43917
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #216: March 22, 2021, 08:56:12 AM »
There goes my bracket.

somehow I still have 11 of my 16, and 3 of my final 4, and am in 1st in my group.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26380
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #217: March 22, 2021, 09:40:45 AM »
Interesting to see Villanova make it through without Gillespie. I see they have another Arcidiacono on the team. There old man was one of the stars of our high school football team. Or is he there grandpa?

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26380
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #218: March 22, 2021, 09:45:30 AM »
Interesting to see Villanova make it through without Gillespie. I see they have another Arcidiacono on the team. There old man was one of the stars of our high school football team. Or is he there grandpa?

EDIT. It is his Dad but he played basketball in high school but then football at Villanova.

https://www.inquirer.com/college-sports/villanova/arcidiacono-ryan-chris-villanova-basketball-philly-family-20190522.html%3foutputType=amp


Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 41384
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #219: March 22, 2021, 10:37:58 AM »
Oral freaking hand-holding Roberts. What a tournament.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18064
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #220: March 22, 2021, 11:23:31 AM »
This is the year for turd Mark Turgeon to somehow make a run with a pedestrian team. We have turds like Oral Roberts and Abeline Christian knocking off teams. Turgeon won't do it, because he sucks and Alabama will steamroll Maryland, but still, this year has proven it's easy to make a run.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26380
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #221: March 22, 2021, 11:41:01 AM »
Oral NO DANCING Roberts. What a tournament.

Offline Count Walewski

  • Posts: 2709
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #222: March 22, 2021, 11:41:17 AM »
You gotta like Loyola-Chicago's chances to advance at least one more round now.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26380
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #223: March 22, 2021, 11:42:05 AM »
You gotta like Loyola-Chicago's chances to advance at least one more round now.
Haven't followed closely but sounded more like they were a 5 seed. 

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43917
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: NCAA Basketball 2020-21
« Reply #224: March 22, 2021, 12:28:38 PM »
Haven't followed closely but sounded more like they were a 5 seed. 

my son told me they were arguably a top-15 team in the country and should have been seeded much higher.