Author Topic: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2  (Read 336 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9318
  • Through Fick and Zim
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #25: July 30, 2020, 05:25:10 PM »
Loving Kieboom's approach at the plate. He's not swinging for the fences, instead he's staying balanced and responsive to the pitch he's given.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 21462
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #26: July 30, 2020, 05:25:38 PM »
Michael A. Taylor is a strong individual.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 21462
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #27: July 30, 2020, 05:26:20 PM »
Loving Kieboom's approach at the plate. He's not swinging for the fences, instead he's staying balanced and responsive to the pitch he's given.

Yup.  Also, nice to see you posting.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 27712
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #28: July 30, 2020, 05:26:24 PM »

Sound effects guy screwed up and hit the HR cheer for that...

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 54978
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #29: July 30, 2020, 05:27:02 PM »
We just need to face staff aces

Offline Greg_SRT

  • Posts: 3561
  • Smooth Sailing from now on
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #30: July 30, 2020, 05:27:19 PM »
MAT> Emilio

Please Dave

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 27712
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #31: July 30, 2020, 05:27:52 PM »

Looks like they installed a new seat back for mitlen but not one for Spider...

Offline imref

  • Posts: 32086
  • Redemption
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #32: July 30, 2020, 05:28:32 PM »
Michael A. Tater

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9318
  • Through Fick and Zim
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #33: July 30, 2020, 05:31:03 PM »
Yup.  Also, nice to see you posting.

Thanks, nice to see many OG faces. The Gameday threads are, let's say, calmer than in years past. But I'm all for quality over quantity anyway :lol:

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9318
  • Through Fick and Zim
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #34: July 30, 2020, 05:32:38 PM »
This time it's the Blue Jays crashing into each other. You'd think with a quieter park, this wouldn't happen as much. But I guess chalk it up to the lack of spring training and familiarity.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 32086
  • Redemption
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #35: July 30, 2020, 05:32:48 PM »
Thanks, nice to see many OG faces. The Gameday threads are, let's say, calmer than in years past. But I'm all for quality over quantity anyway :lol:

In the spirit of things, Chief tried a GDT without fans but it didn’t go so well. :)

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 30396
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #36: July 30, 2020, 05:33:13 PM »
So Joe West really came back out?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 32086
  • Redemption
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #37: July 30, 2020, 05:35:32 PM »
This is going to be a good year if Kieboom keeps this up.

Online tenken627

  • Posts: 1371
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #38: July 30, 2020, 05:40:41 PM »
This is going to be a good year if Kieboom keeps this up.

You always knew the kid can hit. He's shown that everywhere else. It was just a matter of whether the switch can be flicked in the big leagues. Hopefully something clicked now.

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9318
  • Through Fick and Zim
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #39: July 30, 2020, 05:42:48 PM »
This is going to be a good year if Kieboom keeps this up.

It really takes the sting out of the Rendon departure. Surely, part of the calculus was the hope that Kieboom would emerge.

Offline NatsAllThe Way

  • Posts: 13886
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #40: July 30, 2020, 05:49:05 PM »
We have the better of the 2 Harpers.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 21462
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #41: July 30, 2020, 05:53:03 PM »
And Castro looks like he wants to play too. Like it.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 27712
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #42: July 30, 2020, 05:59:02 PM »

I thought you tag with no one out and go half way on one out, FP...that's what you said when Bonafacio was on base...Castro just went half way with no outs and you lauded him for it.

Rule Number 1

With no outs, players should “Tag up” at second and third base if a ball is hit in the air.   

https://morganensberg.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/base-running-with-no-outs/

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 27712
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #43: July 30, 2020, 05:59:47 PM »
We have the better of the 2 Harpers.

Who is the other one?

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 21462
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #44: July 30, 2020, 06:01:34 PM »

Online tenken627

  • Posts: 1371

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 27712
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #46: July 30, 2020, 06:02:26 PM »
Royce?

Oh, him...forgot about him...thanks...

Offline NatNasty

  • Posts: 7358
  • Play Ball!
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #47: July 30, 2020, 06:03:07 PM »
I thought you tag with no one out and go half way on one out, FP...that's what you said when Bonafacio was on base...Castro just went half way with no outs and you lauded him for it.

Rule Number 1

With no outs, players should “Tag up” at second and third base if a ball is hit in the air.   

https://morganensberg.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/base-running-with-no-outs/

You need to learn to tune out that man.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 27712
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #48: July 30, 2020, 06:04:18 PM »
You need to learn to tune out that man.

I know...there's just something about twatwaffles that get me revved up...  ;)

Offline imref

  • Posts: 32086
  • Redemption
Re: Nationals "@" Blue Jays - Game 2
« Reply #49: July 30, 2020, 06:18:04 PM »
We have the better of the 2 Harpers.

Bullpen overall is very good so far.