Author Topic: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4  (Read 2905 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #75: October 07, 2019, 03:20:27 PM »
I saw that angle. It shows Taylor getting a good jump on the ball and taking a good route. He stops because he knows he can't get to it and doesn't want the ball to bounce over his head by getting too close to it. Even if he runs full speed and runs into the fence he doesn't make it to that ball.

Offline Bookman

  • Posts: 1156
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #76: October 07, 2019, 03:21:19 PM »
Still confused:  Sanchez=1 run, 4 hits, 87 pitches and Dave pulls him for Corbin.   Have heard 50 reasons why and still confused. Ain't managers a mystery?

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66172
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #77: October 07, 2019, 03:22:17 PM »
I saw that angle. It shows Taylor getting a good jump on the ball and taking a good route. He stops because he knows he can't get to it and doesn't want the ball to bounce over his head by getting too close to it. Even if he runs full speed and runs into the fence he doesn't make it to that ball.

I guess we disagree.     Don't wait on Uber.      :couch:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #78: October 07, 2019, 03:23:23 PM »
I guess we disagree.     Don't wait on Uber.      :couch:




I'm already on my way.  :D

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #79: October 07, 2019, 03:23:42 PM »
Still confused:  Sanchez=1 run, 4 hits, 87 pitches and Dave pulls him for Corbin.   Have heard 50 reasons why and still confused. Ain't managers a mystery?



:hysterical:

Offline Bookman

  • Posts: 1156
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #80: October 07, 2019, 03:27:44 PM »
Goldy and "O"man   back to back in the 1st

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 27510
  • King of Goodness
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #81: October 07, 2019, 03:32:16 PM »
Corbin starting? Is that correct?

Huh?

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 10276
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #82: October 07, 2019, 03:33:31 PM »
Still confused:  Sanchez=1 run, 4 hits, 87 pitches and Dave pulls him for Corbin.   Have heard 50 reasons why and still confused. Ain't managers a mystery?

This has been explained ad infinitum. It was the right move that didn’t work out. If you’re still confused, maybe it’s you?

Offline Bookman

  • Posts: 1156
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #83: October 07, 2019, 03:33:32 PM »
Huh?
add Huh to  Game, Season, MSP, GIDP etc

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 27510
  • King of Goodness
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #84: October 07, 2019, 03:36:21 PM »
This has been explained ad infinitum. It was the right move that didn’t work out. If you’re still confused, maybe it’s you?

It wasn't the right move in my mind, but I am willing to move on...

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 10276
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #85: October 07, 2019, 03:38:11 PM »
It wasn't the right move in my mind, but I am willing to move on...

Thinking it’s the wrong move is reasonable. Saying you don’t understand the reasoning is altogether different. I think you fall into the first group.

Offline Bookman

  • Posts: 1156
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #86: October 07, 2019, 03:39:25 PM »
This has been explained ad infinitum. It was the right move that didn’t work out. If you’re still confused, maybe it’s you?
You are correct Bluestreak.  I submit to your extreme knowledge and wisdom.  U DA MAN

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28730
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #87: October 07, 2019, 03:40:13 PM »
Thread restored to Slateman after Greg declines.

As for the re: re: re:, it is a tribute to Aretha because we are playing for R-E-S-P-E-C-T


Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 10276
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #88: October 07, 2019, 03:42:14 PM »
You are correct Bluestreak.  I submit to your extreme knowledge and wisdom.  U DA MAN

Glad we agree on something. Have a great day.

Offline Bookman

  • Posts: 1156
Re: Re: Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #89: October 07, 2019, 03:43:23 PM »
Glad we agree on something. Have a great day.
I will and will also tell other the adhere to your thoughts and advice.

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 10276
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #90: October 07, 2019, 03:43:34 PM »
Thread restored to Slateman after Greg declines.

As for the re: re: re:, it is a tribute to Aretha because we are playing for R-E-S-P-E-C-T



Good lord.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66172
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #91: October 07, 2019, 03:45:08 PM »
Thread restored to Slateman after Greg declines.

As for the re: re: re:, it is a tribute to Aretha because we are playing for R-E-S-P-E-C-T

I hear "Respect", I think Redding.        8)

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28730
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #92: October 07, 2019, 03:46:02 PM »
Good lord.
eh, all the re: re: re:'s triggered the thought.  You prefer Otis Redding?

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 10276
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #93: October 07, 2019, 03:46:23 PM »
I hear "Respect", I think Redding.



Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28730
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #94: October 07, 2019, 03:46:23 PM »
I hear "Respect", I think Redding.
eh, all the re: re: re:'s triggered the thought.  You prefer Otis Redding?
mind meld

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 10276
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #95: October 07, 2019, 03:47:45 PM »
eh, all the re: re: re:'s triggered the thought.  You prefer Otis Redding?

I can’t pick a version. They are both exceptional. The “good lord” was to the bouncing thread. Just joking.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66172
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #96: October 07, 2019, 03:49:49 PM »
I can’t pick a version. They are both exceptional. The “good lord” was to the bouncing thread. Just joking.

I can see Otis marchin'/struttin' around the stage.     

Online imref

  • Posts: 31768
  • Redemption
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #97: October 07, 2019, 03:56:31 PM »
I can see Otis marchin'/struttin' around the stage.     

this Otis?


Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66172
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #98: October 07, 2019, 03:57:13 PM »
this Otis?

(Image removed from quote.)

I don't even know who that Otis is.      :)

Offline Bookman

  • Posts: 1156
Re: Nationals v. Dodgers, NLDS Game 4
« Reply #99: October 07, 2019, 03:58:45 PM »
I don't even know who that Otis is.      :)