Author Topic: Washington Redskins thread (2019)  (Read 8354 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63104
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21606
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #102: September 23, 2019, 07:47:36 PM »
More crowded than I expected

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #103: September 23, 2019, 07:48:27 PM »
More crowded than I expected

VaRK showed up with his posse.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 29499
  • King of Goodness
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #104: September 23, 2019, 08:04:31 PM »
More crowded than I expected

Primarily Bears fans so far...

Online imref

  • Posts: 42522
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #105: September 23, 2019, 09:50:43 PM »
just flipped on the game, it's in D.C. right?  Seems like a Bears home game.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63104
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #106: September 23, 2019, 10:02:45 PM »
just flipped on the game, it's in D.C. right?  Seems like a Bears home game.
That's been the way most home games have been

Online imref

  • Posts: 42522
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #107: September 23, 2019, 10:27:48 PM »
That's been the way most home games have been

yeah, I have some friends going to see the Patriots.  Tickets were expensive as the stadium will likely be pack with Pats fans.

Offline 1995hoo

  • Posts: 1082
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #108: September 23, 2019, 10:30:33 PM »

Online imref

  • Posts: 42522
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #109: September 23, 2019, 10:31:25 PM »
Bears trying to let the Skins back in it, horrible pass by Trubisky.

Offline NatNasty

  • Posts: 8546
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #110: September 23, 2019, 10:59:39 PM »
 :clown:

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #111: September 23, 2019, 11:07:32 PM »
Booger's not a bad analyst.

Online Five Banners

  • Posts: 2241
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #112: September 23, 2019, 11:18:07 PM »
Icing on the cake: apparently for London Fletcher’s ring of fame ceremony, the mega-graphic on the jumbotrons during the ceremony spelled his name LONDON FLECTHER

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 29499
  • King of Goodness
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #113: September 23, 2019, 11:19:22 PM »
Da Bears...

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 29499
  • King of Goodness
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #114: September 24, 2019, 12:51:34 AM »
Some cities name streets after their beloved athletes...Chicago is gonna name an overpass for Trubisky...

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21606
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #115: September 24, 2019, 07:10:51 AM »



Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63104
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #116: September 24, 2019, 08:39:50 AM »
Icing on the cake: apparently for London Fletcher’s ring of fame ceremony, the mega-graphic on the jumbotrons during the ceremony spelled his name LONDON FLECTHER

Winning off the field

Offline 1995hoo

  • Posts: 1082
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #117: September 24, 2019, 10:33:59 AM »
Icing on the cake: apparently for London Fletcher’s ring of fame ceremony, the mega-graphic on the jumbotrons during the ceremony spelled his name LONDON FLECTHER


Spelling is not their strong suite.



(At least the apostrophes pointed the right way.)

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #118: September 24, 2019, 10:26:05 PM »
With spidernat now sporting Da Bears avatar, can I assume he lost an avatar bet with varoadking?

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 19411
  • Believe!!!
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #119: September 24, 2019, 11:46:59 PM »
With spidernat now sporting Da Bears avatar, can I assume he lost an avatar bet with varoadking?

You would be correct ;)

Online imref

  • Posts: 42522
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #120: September 29, 2019, 03:07:53 PM »
Guessing this is Jay’s last game.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22277
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #121: September 29, 2019, 03:09:09 PM »
Guessing this is Jay’s last game.
Jay will be fired and Allen will be given head coaching responsibilities too.

freak this team.

Online Smithian

  • Posts: 11499
  • Sunshine Squad 2022
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #122: September 29, 2019, 03:51:08 PM »
I'm a long time Jay Gruden fan, but got to fire him and go with Kevin O'Connell for a tryout. Maybe let Gruden be sacrificed versus Patriots, but past that change has to happen.

Bruce Allen must be fired as well or at minimum reassigned to business side only, where he also is awful. Let new GM make call on long term head coaching decision this offseason.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22277
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #123: September 29, 2019, 04:14:03 PM »
No part of your second paragraph will happen. Snyder has daddy issues, and Allen is his daddy.

I'm a long time Jay Gruden fan, but got to fire him and go with Kevin O'Connell for a tryout. Maybe let Gruden be sacrificed versus Patriots, but past that change has to happen.

Bruce Allen must be fired as well or at minimum reassigned to business side only, where he also is awful. Let new GM make call on long term head coaching decision this offseason.

Offline GataNats

  • Posts: 1164
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2019)
« Reply #124: September 30, 2019, 02:31:13 AM »
Haskins was an awful draft pick.   One year starter from a program that doesn’t produce NFL QBs.   With the loaded QB draft in 2020, it makes zero sense.