Author Topic: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves  (Read 117987 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1200 on: January 15, 2019, 11:20:29 am »
We had two of those already though

Difo has little to no upside and Kendrick is closer to retirement than being an everyday 2B.

Offline Trea Burner

  • Posts: 418
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1201 on: January 15, 2019, 11:36:54 am »
That's kinda the name of the game.  All of these off-season moves for, every team, are gambles.  Some pay off, some flame out.

Sure, but more so for the older guys who have shown some decline.  Dozier and Sanchez are bigger gambles in the sense that they have already demonstrated that they may be washed up.

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1202 on: January 15, 2019, 11:38:43 am »
We had two of those already though

Dozier's batter WAR ranks if he'd been on the Nationals:
2014: 3rd
2015: 2nd
2016: 1st
2017: 2nd

Last year dude had a nagging injury, he's going into his age 32 season, which isn't dead yet.

On a 1 year deal, with potential to be one of the best hitters on the team, for 9 million. You take that gamble every single day. A completely different animal to Howie or Difo.

Offline Elvir Ovcina

  • Posts: 5831
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1203 on: January 15, 2019, 11:45:51 am »
Dozier's batter WAR ranks if he'd been on the Nationals:
2014: 3rd
2015: 2nd
2016: 1st
2017: 2nd

Last year dude had a nagging injury, he's going into his age 32 season, which isn't dead yet.

On a 1 year deal, with potential to be one of the best hitters on the team, for 9 million. You take that gamble every single day. A completely different animal to Howie or Difo.

Yeah, I don't get the hate here.  Dude had one bad year at 31, during which he was supposedly hurt.  Jayson Werth had a similarly bad year at 32 and then OPSed .827, .931, and .849 the next three years.  31 isn't 35.

Offline Greg_SRT

  • Posts: 4030
  • Fun while it lasted
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1204 on: January 15, 2019, 11:56:04 am »
Yeah, I don't get the hate here.  Dude had one bad year at 31, during which he was supposedly hurt.  Jayson Werth had a similarly bad year at 32 and then OPSed .827, .931, and .849 the next three years.  31 isn't 35.


Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1205 on: January 15, 2019, 02:03:50 pm »
I honestly completely forgot that AJ Pollock was a free agent and unsigned (and wanting a big contract) and Dallas Keuchel is still out there.

Offline Trea Burner

  • Posts: 418

Offline bluestreak

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 11279
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1207 on: January 16, 2019, 12:29:40 pm »
https://twitter.com/buster_espn/status/1085587294730502147?s=21

 :hysterical:


If 10 years 175 million is really what is Manny's highest offer, even the Nats should consider getting in on that.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1208 on: January 16, 2019, 12:34:23 pm »
That sounds like an agent sharing the first offer the CHW made in an effort to get more teams to jump in.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30959
  • King of Goodness
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1209 on: January 16, 2019, 12:37:41 pm »

If 10 years 175 million is really what is Manny's highest offer, even the Nats should consider getting in on that.

It said 7 years $175MM when I clicked the link...

Offline bluestreak

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 11279
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1210 on: January 16, 2019, 12:41:01 pm »
It said 7 years $175MM when I clicked the link...

You're right. My statement still applies though. $25 million a year seems quite low. Ridiculously so, even.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30959
  • King of Goodness
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1211 on: January 16, 2019, 12:44:27 pm »
You're right. My statement still applies though. $25 million a year seems quite low. Ridiculously so, even.

I was reading a summary of WAR "value" vs what Owners perceive as added value from elite players.  The said the Owners equate each win over replacement at $1.5MM in added revenue.

It was on my google news feed and I didn't capture it, but if it wasn't some kid in his mom's basement that wrote it, it does perhaps shed some light on the current state of negotiations.

Offline nfotiu

  • Posts: 5175
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1212 on: January 16, 2019, 01:02:08 pm »
I wonder if Machado hurt himself by moving to short stop.  I don't see a good time wanting to use him there, as he's not very good at it.  He makes it complicated by making it seem like he'd pout going back to 3rd base too.  That combined with his late season antics probably dropped him out of the super elite free agent category.

That tweet also makes me think that the Nats 300 million offer to Harper might be by the far the highest on the table.   Sports economics are due for a correction for a lot of reasons, and ironically MLB owners have more ability to control salary vs the fixed cap linked to revenue share leagues.   Free agency salaries have really taken a hit these last couple years as owners wise up to the fact that is not the best way to spend your money and aren't that confident about future revenue streams.

Offline Truconfidence

  • Posts: 3468
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1213 on: January 16, 2019, 01:04:25 pm »
yeah if thats Machados highest offer, it means the Nats must have the highest offer on Harper. Also means the Phillies arent willing to outspend everyone as Nightengale says they are.

Offline hotshot

  • Posts: 1455
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1214 on: January 16, 2019, 01:35:22 pm »
yeah if thats Machados highest offer, it means the Nats must have the highest offer on Harper. Also means the Phillies arent willing to outspend everyone as Nightengale says they are.
Would mean Nats have highest offer on Bryce and oughta think hard about lowering it.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1215 on: January 16, 2019, 02:35:31 pm »
I'm betting that's why Mark Lerner said it was off the table at this point.

Would mean Nats have highest offer on Bryce and oughta think hard about lowering it.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30959
  • King of Goodness
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1216 on: January 16, 2019, 05:23:54 pm »

If 10 years 175 million is really what is Manny's highest offer, even the Nats should consider getting in on that.

His agent says this report is bullcrap...

Offline Elvir Ovcina

  • Posts: 5831
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1217 on: January 16, 2019, 05:43:02 pm »
His agent says this report is bullcrap...

What else is he going to say?  It seems to me that the agent's response in this case would be pretty much the same whether it was true or false.

Offline hotshot

  • Posts: 1455
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1218 on: January 16, 2019, 05:55:24 pm »
JD Martinez signed in late February. I wouldn't be surprised if that's the case with Machado and Harper too.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28032
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1219 on: January 16, 2019, 06:21:48 pm »
What else is he going to say?  It seems to me that the agent's response in this case would be pretty much the same whether it was true or false.
What I read was 7 years at 25 million each year. Or 175 million. Not ten years.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2019/01/white-sox-offer-manny-machado-seven-years-175-million.html

I mentioned this a while back but the players wanting ten years with multiple opt outs just doesn’t make sense for teams. Why commit on your end totally to a guy and give him all the options.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28032
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1220 on: January 16, 2019, 06:45:13 pm »
It said 7 years $175MM when I clicked the link...
Didn’t see your response when I posted mine. Yes. Other places also have it at 7 years.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28032
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1221 on: January 16, 2019, 06:46:19 pm »
JD Martinez signed in late February. I wouldn't be surprised if that's the case with Machado and Harper too.
Do you think others will start signing before then?  Like AJ Pollack. Seems that the agents do a disservice to their other clients by letting the big guns wait.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30959
  • King of Goodness
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1222 on: January 16, 2019, 07:59:01 pm »
What else is he going to say?  It seems to me that the agent's response in this case would be pretty much the same whether it was true or false.

What did Boras say about our offer of $300MM/10 to Royce?

Seems the wise play is to say nothing at all...

Offline Expos

  • Posts: 1094
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1223 on: January 17, 2019, 12:05:13 am »
Scott Copeland signed. He could be this years version of Jeremy Hellickson.

9W-7L with a 3.43 ERA in 22 starts in AAA last year.
126 IP, 100 KO, 44 BB, 1.389 WHIP

Decent depth player.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66856
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1224 on: January 17, 2019, 03:05:25 am »
Scott Copeland signed. He could be this years version of Jeremy Hellickson.

9W-7L with a 3.43 ERA in 22 starts in AAA last year.
126 IP, 100 KO, 44 BB, 1.389 WHIP

Decent depth player.

Except Hellickson was actually decent at the MLB level . . .