Author Topic: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3  (Read 1309 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online DCFan

  • Posts: 15553
  • What are you dense?
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #50: September 22, 2018, 05:13:35 PM »
Difo forgot to swing and Zim was out by a mile.

Offline NatNasty

  • Posts: 7285
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #51: September 22, 2018, 05:13:35 PM »
Baserunning blunder  :o

Offline Panther Modern

  • Posts: 1391
  • Hitting is not about muscle. It's simple physics.
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #52: September 22, 2018, 05:16:20 PM »
It looks just like him.

Yeah, I think so, too. Not many kids dress up as refs and call the game from the stands :lol:

Online DCFan

  • Posts: 15553
  • What are you dense?
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #53: September 22, 2018, 05:17:22 PM »
Yeah, I think so, too. Not many kids dress up as refs and call the game from the stands :lol:

I’ve got faith in the kid.

Online DCFan

  • Posts: 15553
  • What are you dense?
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #54: September 22, 2018, 05:19:55 PM »
That even Steven stat with the Nats in the lead, the race for mediocrity.

Offline Panther Modern

  • Posts: 1391
  • Hitting is not about muscle. It's simple physics.
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #55: September 22, 2018, 05:19:56 PM »
I’ve got faith in the kid.

Put him on the mound. He'd probably make the calls better than older umps.

Online Slateman

  • the rain cloud that follows you around
  • Posts: 53821
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #56: September 22, 2018, 05:25:30 PM »
So is Voth pitching well, or are the Mets just this sucktastic

Offline Panther Modern

  • Posts: 1391
  • Hitting is not about muscle. It's simple physics.
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #57: September 22, 2018, 05:28:34 PM »
So is Voth pitching well, or are the Mets just this sucktastic

Glass half full: Voth is doing well.

Offline dcpatti

  • Posts: 3051
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #58: September 22, 2018, 05:29:20 PM »
So is Voth pitching well, or are the Mets just this sucktastic

a bit of both. Voth has always had some nasty stuff. Lots of weird movement.  he just had big control issues.  Seems to have really locked in today and consistently put the ball where he wanted it to go. Maybe he'll figure out how to do that on a regular basis.

The Mets suck regardless.  Apparently some of the 7 Whine Army just got kicked out lol.

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 9890
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #59: September 22, 2018, 05:30:36 PM »
One hit and no runs through 5 innings on 73 pitches? Yank him...

Offline dcpatti

  • Posts: 3051
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #60: September 22, 2018, 05:35:26 PM »
One hit and no runs through 5 innings on 73 pitches? Yank him...

Probably on an innings limit. Most of the young'uns are.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #61: September 22, 2018, 05:39:12 PM »
:lmao: Bob got excited

Offline trangert418

  • Posts: 3610
  • Quit Clowning Around
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #62: September 22, 2018, 05:40:33 PM »
What's with all the warning track power lately? :shrug:

Offline Panther Modern

  • Posts: 1391
  • Hitting is not about muscle. It's simple physics.
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #63: September 22, 2018, 05:40:34 PM »
Nice, Rendon :clap:

Offline trangert418

  • Posts: 3610
  • Quit Clowning Around
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #64: September 22, 2018, 05:41:36 PM »
It’s like someone just said, it’s the last Saturday game. And it’s a nice day.

Edit, and that faith thing after the game.

And it's supposed to rain all day tomorrow.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #65: September 22, 2018, 05:43:29 PM »
dear God, now it was the weather's fault?

Offline Panther Modern

  • Posts: 1391
  • Hitting is not about muscle. It's simple physics.
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #66: September 22, 2018, 05:43:52 PM »
dear God, now it was the weather's fault?

One can never go wrong blaming the weather.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 27486
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #67: September 22, 2018, 05:54:04 PM »
dear God, now it was the weather's fault?

2 degrees no less...

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 9890
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #68: September 22, 2018, 06:04:25 PM »
This game is flying...

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 9890
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #69: September 22, 2018, 06:05:54 PM »
dear God, now it was the weather's fault?

What did who say?

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 27486
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #70: September 22, 2018, 06:13:24 PM »
What did who say?

The Bobbsey twins bemoaning Royce's warning track shots, and how the cooler weather and breeze kept those balls in ...

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 9890
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #71: September 22, 2018, 06:15:06 PM »
The Bobsie twins bemoaning Royce's warning track shots, and how the cooler weather kept those balls in ...

There was a decent breeze blowing in earlier in the game. I mean the weather does affect these things. Sometime we go crazy trying to come down on these guys.

Offline Panther Modern

  • Posts: 1391
  • Hitting is not about muscle. It's simple physics.
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #72: September 22, 2018, 06:15:25 PM »
This game is flying...

For real. At least the Nats are up by six. 

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 27486
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #73: September 22, 2018, 06:16:25 PM »
There was a decent breeze blowing in earlier in the game. I mean the weather does affect these things. Sometime we go crazy trying to come down on these guys.

Whatever...

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 9890
Re: Nationals vs. Mets, Game 3
« Reply #74: September 22, 2018, 06:17:29 PM »
Trea Turner leads all major leaguers in SB. I was surprised at who was second: Whit Merrifield..