Author Topic: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1  (Read 7362 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #150: July 18, 2017, 10:56:05 PM »
:shock: magic glove

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 9967
  • Team America 2021
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #151: July 18, 2017, 10:56:08 PM »
Didn't this Maldonado fellow play catcher for the Nats a few years ago?

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66170
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #152: July 18, 2017, 10:56:21 PM »
All Star

Offline stealyerbase

  • Posts: 5398
  • YUMMY! Good for you too!
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #153: July 18, 2017, 10:56:36 PM »
FACE!!!  :mitt:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #154: July 18, 2017, 10:56:52 PM »
I'd have complained too. Numbers 2 & 5 shouldn't have even BEEN included.


:lmao:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #155: July 18, 2017, 10:57:37 PM »
Didn't this Maldonado fellow play catcher for the Nats a few years ago?


Carlos

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 9967
  • Team America 2021
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #156: July 18, 2017, 10:57:41 PM »
:shock: magic glove
We used to play Dunn over there

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 9967
  • Team America 2021

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66170
  • We had 'em all the way.

Offline RiotAct

  • Posts: 1584
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #159: July 18, 2017, 11:00:00 PM »
Harper's gotten way too cocky. You've got the best offense in the league behind you, stay at first.
eh, I don't mind it.  Interleague game, up by 10.5 in our division.  As long as he doesn't try pulling that in a playoff game.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #160: July 18, 2017, 11:00:34 PM »
The Jackal?


Robert Ludlum used him in the Bourne trilogy.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66170
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #161: July 18, 2017, 11:00:44 PM »
eh, I don't mind it.  Interleague game, up by 10.5 in our division.  As long as he doesn't try pulling that in a playoff game.

....   or get hurt.

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 10811
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #162: July 18, 2017, 11:01:09 PM »
I'd have complained too. Numbers 2 & 5 shouldn't have even BEEN included.

The point was that I wanted people to judge the folks that slate named.

I am personally partial to #1 (Margot Robbie). What do you guys think?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #163: July 18, 2017, 11:02:44 PM »
The point was that I wanted people to judge the folks that slate named.

I am personally partial to #1 (Margot Robbie). What do you guys think?


I agree with you, in a landslide.

Offline stealyerbase

  • Posts: 5398
  • YUMMY! Good for you too!
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #164: July 18, 2017, 11:02:44 PM »
The point was that I wanted people to judge the folks that slate named.

I am personally partial to #1 (Margot Robbie). What do you guys think?
Very photogenic and slightly damp. Me likey!

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 19435
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #165: July 18, 2017, 11:02:53 PM »
The point was that I wanted people to judge the folks that slate named.

I am personally partial to #1 (Margot Robbie). What do you guys think?
They look like very nice young ladies and would be happy if my son married any of them.

Offline stealyerbase

  • Posts: 5398
  • YUMMY! Good for you too!
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #166: July 18, 2017, 11:04:15 PM »
I bet Bob thought TTB hit that one out....

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66170
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #167: July 18, 2017, 11:04:37 PM »
The point was that I wanted people to judge the folks that slate named.

I am personally partial to #1 (Margot Robbie). What do you guys think?

I'm partial to brunettes but I like 3 and 5.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 9967
  • Team America 2021
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #168: July 18, 2017, 11:05:09 PM »
Where's nats2playoffs?

Offline trangert418

  • Posts: 3609
  • Quit Clowning Around
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #169: July 18, 2017, 11:09:36 PM »
Had to rewind and hear it a 2nd time.....STEVE Trout.....LOL.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66170
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #170: July 18, 2017, 11:10:30 PM »
I recounted and it's 4 and 6.

Offline bluestreak

  • Posts: 10811
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #171: July 18, 2017, 11:11:52 PM »
They look like very nice young ladies and would be happy if my son married any of them.

I do not have a son. But if I did and he married any of these ladies it might constitute a serious problem.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #172: July 18, 2017, 11:12:43 PM »
FP :smh:

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 28447
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #173: July 18, 2017, 11:13:32 PM »
FP :smh:

I know...like anyone cares who he thinks is a legend...

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 19435
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 1
« Reply #174: July 18, 2017, 11:13:50 PM »
I do not have a son. But if I did and he married any of these ladies it might constitute a serious problem.
Not if your trying to breed a master race.