Author Topic: NL East (2017)  (Read 53482 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 25972
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #425: July 12, 2017, 09:03:48 PM »
I'm not worried about the Braves at all. You can't win consistently over 162 games without strong starting pitching. Look at the downfalls the Yankees and Os have suffered. Pitching still wins in baseball. Been that way for 150 years.
That's why they need to pick up another starting pitcher.

Offline nfotiu

  • Posts: 5045
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #426: July 19, 2017, 09:43:10 AM »
So, it looks like it's going to be the Cubs in the first round.   On paper, we look like the much stronger team, but I am not loving the idea of facing the World Series champs. 

Offline expos1994

  • Posts: 339
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #427: July 19, 2017, 09:54:13 AM »
So, it looks like it's going to be the Cubs in the first round.   On paper, we look like the much stronger team, but I am not loving the idea of facing the World Series champs.

lol... write that in with a sharpie. Only 70 games to go you can pretty much call it at this point.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #428: July 19, 2017, 10:00:44 AM »
Cubs and Brewers have 10 games left against each other. 7 of them are in Milwaukee. Lots of baseball left.

Offline 3bside

  • Posts: 500
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #429: July 19, 2017, 10:00:53 AM »
Fingers crossed that we stay healthy, and get back Turner, Taylor and Werth at full strength.  We don't want a repeat of last year, when we lost Strasburg and Ramos in September, and Murphy pulled his glute.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #430: July 19, 2017, 12:16:32 PM »
So, it looks like it's going to be the Cubs in the first round. 

Brewers have a 2.5 game lead and you've written them off?

Offline rileyn

  • Posts: 4115
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #431: July 19, 2017, 04:25:19 PM »
Brewers have a 2.5 game lead and you've written them off?
Dodgers, Cubs, Nats.  The cream has risen.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 39786
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #432: July 19, 2017, 04:59:27 PM »
Brewers have a 2.5 game lead and you've written them off?
in Colorado, that's like being 4 games behind.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #433: July 19, 2017, 05:03:11 PM »
So really the goal is to stay ahead of the Cubs and Brewers. If you can catch the Astros, that would be nice, too. Currently 3rd best record in baseball.

Offline mimontero88

  • Posts: 6240
  • The GOAT
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #434: July 19, 2017, 05:22:05 PM »
Brewers have a 2.5 game lead and you've written them off?
In fairness, everyone and their mother knows the Cubs are the more talented team.  It's been quite a mystery how much they've underperformed this season but they look like they're getting on the right track now.  Maybe some early-season complacency that the team has now put behind them.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #435: July 19, 2017, 05:23:15 PM »
In fairness, everyone and their mother knows the Cubs are the more talented team.  It's been quite a mystery how much they've underperformed this season but they look like they're getting on the right track now.  Maybe some early-season complacency that the team has now put behind them.
I think the Quintana trade energized them much like the Doolittle/Madson did for the Nats.

Offline mimontero88

  • Posts: 6240
  • The GOAT
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #436: July 19, 2017, 05:23:47 PM »
Pretty amazing for how great the Dodgers have been this season that the Nats still look like they'll be the first team in the NL to clinch their division.  Really speaks to how strong the West is and how weak the East is behind us.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22292
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #437: July 19, 2017, 08:56:48 PM »
Astros are AL now, right? Or are you just talking about record...

So really the goal is to stay ahead of the Cubs and Brewers. If you can catch the Astros, that would be nice, too. Currently 3rd best record in baseball.

Offline mimontero88

  • Posts: 6240
  • The GOAT
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #438: July 19, 2017, 08:57:46 PM »
Astros are AL now, right? Or are you just talking about record...

Think he means for homefield in the World Series if it comes to that.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #439: July 19, 2017, 10:13:49 PM »
Think he means for homefield in the World Series if it comes to that.
right

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22292
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #440: July 20, 2017, 08:56:03 AM »
Think he means for homefield in the World Series if it comes to that.

I hate to admit that I no longer know how home field is determined anymore. Best record overall?

Offline 3bside

  • Posts: 500
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #441: July 20, 2017, 09:43:28 AM »
We actually have a better record on the road than at home this year, and we lost both game 5's at home in 2012 and 2016.  So maybe the home field advantage doesn't matter so much.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #442: July 20, 2017, 09:47:06 AM »
I hate to admit that I no longer know how home field is determined anymore. Best record overall?
Yes

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #443: July 20, 2017, 12:46:07 PM »
We actually have a better record on the road than at home this year, and we lost both game 5's at home in 2012 and 2016.  So maybe the home field advantage doesn't matter so much.

And we had home field in 2014 (but it never came to game 5). So we've had home field in all three playoff series, and lost them all.  Still, I'd rather have it.

Offline RiotAct

  • Posts: 1584
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #444: July 21, 2017, 03:54:21 PM »
I hate to admit that I no longer know how home field is determined anymore. Best record overall?
yes, thank heavens

Offline bluestreak

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 11259
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #445: July 21, 2017, 04:58:55 PM »
yes, thank heavens

It’s funny, people complained so much about the All-Star game determining home field, but prior to that, it wasn’t determined by record either. It just alternated.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #446: July 21, 2017, 05:07:47 PM »
It’s funny, people complained so much about the All-Star game determining home field, but prior to that, it wasn’t determined by record either. It just alternated.
Oh, people complained about that, too...

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29563
  • King of Goodness
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #447: July 21, 2017, 05:08:00 PM »
It’s funny, people complained so much about the All-Star game determining home field, but prior to that, it wasn’t determined by record either. It just alternated.

Which was, and would be, fine...

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #448: July 21, 2017, 07:44:13 PM »
Oh, people complained about that, too...
I didn't.   NL had home even years and AL odd years.  So if I wanted to recall where game 7 was played in 1962, San Francisco or New York, I knew from the year that it was San Francisco.  Until 1994 anyway, when there was no World Series, and after that it switched, AL even years and NL odd.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: NL East (2017)
« Reply #449: July 21, 2017, 09:00:55 PM »
I didn't.   NL had home even years and AL odd years.  So if I wanted to recall where game 7 was played in 1962, San Francisco or New York, I knew from the year that it was San Francisco.  Until 1994 anyway, when there was no World Series, and after that it switched, AL even years and NL odd.
Cool. I never thought it made sense to not give it to the team with the best record.