Author Topic: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2  (Read 26848 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #250 on: September 17, 2016, 04:24:40 pm »
Getting on base is normally the objective for a hitter

That wasn't aimed at your post. It was aimed at the moron who is doing the game and said that it wasn't like Rendon was trying to tag the runner but that the runner basically fell onto the tag. That doesn't matter. he was still out.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #251 on: September 17, 2016, 04:34:16 pm »
Werth had a long day  ...  pfffffffffffffffffffffffft

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66454
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #252 on: September 17, 2016, 04:35:45 pm »
Werth had a long day  ...  pfffffffffffffffffffffffft

FP?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 46627
  • Re-contending in 202...6?
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #253 on: September 17, 2016, 11:20:39 pm »
Getting on base is normally the objective for a hitter

Some people still struggle with the basics of baseball. :shrug:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #254 on: September 17, 2016, 11:43:52 pm »
Some people still struggle with the basics of baseball. :shrug:

Read my response you freaking moron. My post had nothing to do with what Slate posted. I was talking about what the commentator was saying.