Author Topic: Trade Thread (Read 89927 times)

Slateman · « **Reply #575 on:** July 18, 2016, 06:41:07 pm »

Quote from: Natsinpwc on July 18, 2016, 06:40:30 pm

Me 2; but he is years away and I think the Yankees are looking for someone to help them much sooner.

If they're selling, they're not going to care much

Natsinpwc · « **Reply #576 on:** July 18, 2016, 06:43:24 pm »

Quote from: Slateman on July 18, 2016, 06:41:07 pm

If they're selling, they're not going to care much

I think they will because its the Yankees and its NYC--lots of pressure on them. Depends on who else they unload and what they get but Miller is a top 5 reliever and I think they will want more than a B+ prospect as some here call anyone below Double A.

Ali the Baseball Cat · « **Reply #577 on:** July 18, 2016, 06:46:53 pm »

Compounded no doubt by Los Mets being in the WS...the shame must be unbearable.

Quote from: Natsinpwc on July 18, 2016, 06:43:24 pm

I think they will because its the Yankees and its NYC--lots of pressure on them.

Dave301 · « **Reply #578 on:** July 18, 2016, 06:59:10 pm »

Quote from: Natsinpwc on July 18, 2016, 06:40:30 pm

Me 2; but he is years away and I think the Yankees are looking for someone to help them much sooner.

I don't think the Yankees care as long as he's ready to play alongside Bryce in '19.

Mattionals · « **Reply #579 on:** July 18, 2016, 07:15:34 pm »

Quote from: Natsinpwc on July 18, 2016, 06:43:24 pm

I think they will because its the Yankees and its NYC--lots of pressure on them. Depends on who else they unload and what they get but Miller is a top 5 reliever and I think they will want more than a B+ prospect as some here call anyone below Double A.

The thing is, the Yankees will need more than just someone who is ready now or next year. They have no real starting pitching in the system outside Severino. They have Bird, Judge, Williams, and Sanchez who can all help now, but that still leaves holes. Ellsbury and Gardner are just average at this point and who knows about Ellsbury's health. Didi looks good and can move off of SS when Mateo is ready in a few years. 3B and DH are black holes. Sure, they can plan to get Harper, but even still, they have to get some starting pitching, and unless they pull a 2015 Cubs, they will probably need some time, a year or two, to develop at the MLB level and put up with the rigors of the game and competition.

UMDNats · « **Reply #580 on:** July 18, 2016, 07:31:37 pm »

At this point Mateo will move off SS for Didi. No way you move a very good defender and established player for a rookie. Didi has been incredible.

BrandonK · « **Reply #581 on:** July 18, 2016, 08:11:20 pm »

NYYFF.net up in here

Mattionals · « **Reply #582 on:** July 18, 2016, 08:51:00 pm »

Quote from: BrandonK on July 18, 2016, 08:11:20 pm

NYYFF.net up in here

Calm down Francis, lol.

I'm sticking to Chapman as the target all along. If there is a hitter acquired, I expect it to be Bruce. This is Dusty's team and he wants to get the band back together.

Elvir Ovcina · « **Reply #583 on:** July 18, 2016, 09:00:09 pm »

Quote from: BrandonK on July 18, 2016, 08:11:20 pm

NYYFF.net up in here

I'm somewhat proud that I don't know who "Mateo" is. I assume he's the next Ricky Ledee, Ruben Rivera, Eric Duncan, or Jesus Montero - someone the New York media bigs up to be a megastar since the time he's in single-A who turns out to be a AAAA player. When did the Yankees farm system last produce a very good player outside of the bullpen (theirs or anyone else's)?

aBaltoNat · « **Reply #584 on:** July 18, 2016, 09:10:44 pm »

Quote from: Mattionals on July 18, 2016, 08:51:00 pm

Calm down Francis, lol.

I'm sticking to Chapman as the target all along. If there is a hitter acquired, I expect it to be Bruce. This is Dusty's team and he wants to get the band back together.

I do NOT want Bruce on this team. Give me Beltran, or give me Death.

Mattionals · « **Reply #585 on:** July 18, 2016, 09:48:31 pm »

Quote from: aBaltoNat on July 18, 2016, 09:10:44 pm

I do NOT want Bruce on this team. Give me Beltran, or give me Death.

Place your complaint directly in Rizzo's mailbox.

aBaltoNat · « **Reply #586 on:** July 18, 2016, 10:45:45 pm »

Quote from: Mattionals on July 18, 2016, 09:48:31 pm

Place your complaint directly in Rizzo's mailbox.

It isn't a complaint....yet.

For those thinking that the Yankees "won't care" about giving up Miller--you are not correct and history will prove me right. The Yankees of yesteryears are gone--the current ones will spend, but they will care about their up and coming talent as well as the talent they buy once they think they can compete.

whytev · « **Reply #587 on:** July 18, 2016, 11:46:40 pm »

Quote from: houston-nat on July 18, 2016, 05:21:55 pm

Give him some slack, he's only 12.

Wait, Zim the kid is actually a kid??? I'm sorry, man. That was meant to be a burn on a grown man.

whytev · « **Reply #588 on:** July 18, 2016, 11:48:30 pm »

Quote from: Slateman on July 18, 2016, 06:41:07 pm

If they're selling, they're not going to care much

They might be too proud to sell Miller. They're gonna wanna move Chapman as he is walk year.

Slateman · « **Reply #589 on:** July 19, 2016, 07:10:51 am »

Quote from: whytev on July 18, 2016, 11:48:30 pm

They might be too proud to sell Miller. They're gonna wanna move Chapman as he is walk year.

They're all in or they're not. They aren't going to get the help they need this year from dealing Chapman alone. Either they are willing to trade off Mateo, Judge, or Sanchez for the starting pitching they need, or they are going to punt this year.

imref · « **Reply #590 on:** July 19, 2016, 10:23:25 am »

Rosenthal:

Quote

*Yankees closer Aroldis Chapman is the Nationals’ most likely target, sources say -- manager Dusty Baker is fond of him from their days together with the Reds, and the acquisition cost for Andrew Miller might be beyond the Nats’ liking.

While the Nats might not consider right-hander Lucas Giolito as untouchable as they once did, would they trade him for a reliever, even one as good as Miller who is under control for two more years? Seems doubtful.

As for an outfielder, the Nationals still could pursue a Bruce or Reddick, but the team does not want to move Bryce Harper from right to center. Trea Turner in center likely will become more of an option if the Nats do not acquire outside help.

Slateman · « **Reply #591 on:** July 19, 2016, 10:31:26 am »

Don't understand the dislike of Harper in CF. He was fine there in 2012. Not like he's hitting

houston-nat · « **Reply #592 on:** July 19, 2016, 10:34:12 am »

Quote from: Slateman on July 19, 2016, 10:31:26 am

Don't understand the dislike of Harper in CF. He was fine there in 2012. Not like he's hitting

He's 4 years older now. Defensive skills can change a lot in 4 years, especially at a position you don't play.

aspenbubba · « **Reply #593 on:** July 19, 2016, 10:36:12 am »

Quote from: Slateman on July 19, 2016, 10:31:26 am

Don't understand the dislike of Harper in CF. He was fine there in 2012. Not like he's hitting

IIRC Harp wanted to play CF but the Nats were concerned about his legs holding up in subsequent years.

Slateman · « **Reply #594 on:** July 19, 2016, 10:38:17 am »

Quote from: houston-nat on July 19, 2016, 10:34:12 am

He's 4 years older now. Defensive skills can change a lot in 4 years, especially at a position you don't play.

Quote from: aspenbubba on July 19, 2016, 10:36:12 am

IIRC Harp wanted to play CF but the Nats were concerned about his legs holding up in subsequent years.

He's 23 and should be in the best shape of his life. Dusty is already giving players days off throughout the year.

He had a whopping 286 innings in CF prior to playing at the MLB level and did fine. Bryce Harper would be fine in CF.

Ray D · « **Reply #595 on:** July 19, 2016, 10:45:05 am »

He's ok in center, you can live with him there. But he's far short of Denard Span, or even Michael Taylor, and I think that's what Rizzo wants, someone in center who will catch virtually everything. Although, Harper is probably as good as Revere, so it's hard to completely understand the thinking. I don't know how this Turner-in center experiment is going, but I can't imagine that they expect him to develop into an elite centerfielder like Rizzo likes.

houston-nat · « **Reply #596 on:** July 19, 2016, 11:15:06 am »

We're reportedly interested in Rockies OF Charlie Blackmon, who is batting .305 with a .386 OBP, is an OK defensive CF if not exactly Taylor, and who is signed through 2018. Blackmon is 30.

That would be pretty cool. He'd cost a better prospect since he's got 2 years left, but then the CF/leadoff problem is solved, Taylor can be the defensive sub, and Turner doesn't have to learn outfield.

imref · « **Reply #597 on:** July 19, 2016, 11:16:22 am »

Quote from: houston-nat on July 19, 2016, 11:15:06 am

We're reportedly interested in Rockies OF Charlie Blackmon, who is batting .305 with a .386 OBP, is an OK defensive CF if not exactly Taylor, and who is signed through 2018. Blackmon is 30.

That would be pretty cool. He'd cost a better prospect since he's got 2 years left, but then the CF/leadoff problem is solved, Taylor can be the defensive sub, and Turner doesn't have to learn outfield.

where does that leave Revere?

Natsinpwc · « **Reply #598 on:** July 19, 2016, 11:18:56 am »

Quote from: imref on July 19, 2016, 11:16:22 am

where does that leave Revere?

Syracuse.

BrandonK · « **Reply #599 on:** July 19, 2016, 11:18:59 am »

Quote from: houston-nat on July 19, 2016, 11:15:06 am

We're reportedly interested in Rockies OF Charlie Blackmon, who is batting .305 with a .386 OBP, is an OK defensive CF if not exactly Taylor, and who is signed through 2018. Blackmon is 30.

That would be pretty cool. He'd cost a better prospect since he's got 2 years left, but then the CF/leadoff problem is solved, Taylor can be the defensive sub, and Turner doesn't have to learn outfield.

Chuck Nasty would be awesome too. His defense isn't awful. Definitely better than Revere. Can't see him getting more than CarGo still.