Author Topic: Trade Thread  (Read 89762 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline More of #34

  • Posts: 901
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #250 on: June 17, 2016, 06:53:44 pm »
Papelbon is not the closer he once was.  I hope the Nats can get a replacement who's solid.  If he stays, it might very well doom this otherwise solid team.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66797
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #251 on: June 17, 2016, 07:18:01 pm »
These rumor sites are silly. Where would Trea even play? Yankees are set at 2nd and SS. Castro and Gregorius arent FA until 2020

Castro sucks. And he could move to third.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66797
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #252 on: June 17, 2016, 07:21:22 pm »
Turner for Snell, Colome, and Ryne Stanek

Offline raleighnat

  • Posts: 664
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #253 on: June 17, 2016, 07:24:53 pm »
This is silly.  Rizzo wouldn't trade Turner for a stud reliever with 6 years of control much less Chapman (a rental) or Miller (some control at a high salary).  I don't think the Yankees have anything valuable enough for Turner.

Offline OvechkinsWodka

  • Posts: 452
  • chicks dig curly W's
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #254 on: June 17, 2016, 07:35:46 pm »
The A's traded MLB ready Russel for some mediocre starting pitching help

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #255 on: June 17, 2016, 07:37:13 pm »
 :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical:

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #256 on: June 17, 2016, 07:40:17 pm »
The problem with having a premium prospect at an up-the-middle position is that everyone asks for him in every trade.  There's absolutely no way he should be moved for a relief pitcher.  Any relief pitcher.  60 innings of relief in one or two seasons at a fairly high salary is not even close in value to 6 seasons of SS or 2B with offense and even passable defense at minimum or near minimum salary.  They'll want everything and a sandwich, just because they're the Yankees and they spend a lot of time sniffing their own jocks. 

Suppose also this: you trade Turner to the Yankees.  2 weeks later, any one of Espinosa, Rendon, or Murphy gets hurt for an extended period (hardly a stretch, especially in Rendon's case).  Suddenly you've got your closer...and Stephen Drew playing in your infield every day.  Then you're f'ed every day of the week and twice on Sunday.  So no.  Absolutely not.  Papelbon closing is better than even taking the risk of that happening.

Except Drew is raking, but point taken.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66797
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #257 on: June 17, 2016, 08:22:17 pm »
This is silly.  Rizzo wouldn't trade Turner for a stud reliever with 6 years of control much less Chapman (a rental) or Miller (some control at a high salary).  I don't think the Yankees have anything valuable enough for Turner.

I would trade Turner for Sanchez, Acevedo, and Betances


But the Yankees will want starting pitching.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #258 on: June 18, 2016, 12:52:15 pm »
I would trade Turner for Sanchez, Acevedo, and Betances


But the Yankees will want starting pitching.
We've got staring pitching pieces to trade. There's a deal to be made there.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66797
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #259 on: June 18, 2016, 12:59:26 pm »
We've got staring pitching pieces to trade. There's a deal to be made there.

I'm not willing to give up Lopez or Giolito for Miller or Chapman alone. They'd have to include something and I don't think they'd be willing to do that. I don't think Voth is enough to get Miller or Chapman. So unless Fedde just lights it up between now and the deadline, I don't think there is a deal with the Yankees.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #260 on: June 18, 2016, 01:04:42 pm »
I'm not willing to give up Lopez or Giolito for Miller or Chapman alone. They'd have to include something and I don't think they'd be willing to do that. I don't think Voth is enough to get Miller or Chapman. So unless Fedde just lights it up between now and the deadline, I don't think there is a deal with the Yankees.
There are more than four pitching prospects in the system. Plenty of room to do something creative to get a deal done.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66797
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #261 on: June 18, 2016, 01:57:48 pm »
There are more than four pitching prospects in the system. Plenty of room to do something creative to get a deal done.

None that the Yankees will want for elite relivers. Look at what Giles garnered.

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #262 on: June 18, 2016, 02:33:41 pm »
None that the Yankees will want for elite relivers. Look at what Giles garnered.
Giles is also younger and under control for much longer than Chapman or Miller.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #263 on: June 18, 2016, 02:50:56 pm »
None that the Yankees will want for elite relivers. Look at what Giles garnered.
Maybe. There will be ways to make a deal happen beyond just those four dudes.

Offline monkeyhit

  • Posts: 2603
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #264 on: June 18, 2016, 02:57:38 pm »
Cole and Goodwin for Miller. Maybe throw in Pap if they want him.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28006
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #265 on: June 18, 2016, 03:34:15 pm »
Cole and Goodwin for Miller. Maybe throw in Pap if they want him.
The Yankees would never do that.  Two middling prospects for a top reliever.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66797
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #266 on: June 18, 2016, 05:20:47 pm »
Cole and Goodwin for Miller. Maybe throw in Pap if they want him.

They want/need starting pitching

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #267 on: June 18, 2016, 05:40:22 pm »
What would you guys be willing to give up for half a season of Chapman?


Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #268 on: June 18, 2016, 05:50:13 pm »
What would you guys be willing to give up for half a season of Chapman?


Not much. Just gave up 2 HRs.

No Omar Minaya type trades!

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #269 on: June 18, 2016, 05:52:34 pm »
Not much. Just gave up 2 HRs.

No Omar Minaya type trades!

Buy low :P

I think I'd happily go AJ Cole, Wilmer Difo, and Jeffry Rodriguez or some other fringe prospect.

I bet they'd want Lopez or Fedde though.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66797
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #270 on: June 18, 2016, 06:07:28 pm »
Buy low :P

I think I'd happily go AJ Cole, Wilmer Difo, and Jeffry Rodriguez or some other fringe prospect.

I bet they'd want Lopez or Fedde though.

I'd consider Fedde if we got an additional middling prospect

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #271 on: June 18, 2016, 06:22:22 pm »
What would you guys be willing to give up for half a season of Chapman?


Tyler Moore. Shame we let him go.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #272 on: June 18, 2016, 06:23:04 pm »
It wasn't contractual. More of a gentlemen's agreement.
Right, and more importantly, it applied to 2015.  The "gentlemens' agreement" no longer applies.

I wonder if he'd be vindictive enough to groove a few select pitches

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #273 on: June 18, 2016, 07:29:48 pm »
I wonder if he'd be vindictive enough to groove a few select pitches

How would you know the difference?

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #274 on: June 18, 2016, 07:44:25 pm »
How would you know the difference?

Fair point